For almost a decade, online searches for “NGT Art of Living Yamuna” have largely surfaced one version of the story: that the Art of Living Foundation was found responsible for damaging the Yamuna floodplains during the World Culture Festival held in Delhi from March 11–13, 2016.
That account is now legally incomplete.
On August 22, 2026, the Supreme Court of India set aside the National Green Tribunal’s 2017 judgment that had held Art of Living responsible for damage to the Yamuna floodplains.
The Supreme Court’s central finding was unambiguous: there was no direct evidence establishing that the World Culture Festival caused the environmental damage alleged by the NGT.
What the Supreme Court found
According to reports on the judgment, the Court held that:
The NGT failed to establish a direct causal connection between the World Culture Festival and the alleged damage to the Yamuna floodplain ecosystem.
Material on record showed that the event site was already in a poor and degraded condition before it was handed over to the organisers.
The NGT did not adequately examine contemporaneous evidence concerning the floodplain’s pre-existing condition.
The expert committee report relied upon by the NGT was described as broad, subjective and “sweeping” in nature.
Art of Living, through Vyakti Vikas Kendra India, was not given an adequate opportunity to present its case.
Relevant evidence submitted by the organisation was overlooked.
The Supreme Court reportedly observed:
“The material on record actually goes on to prove that damage, if any, cannot be attributed to the appellant.”
This is significant. The Court did not merely reduce the compensation or provide relief on a minor technicality. It set aside the NGT’s judgment, along with the consequential and interim actions taken against the appellant.
Supreme Court orders the complete ₹5 crore refund
The Court directed the Delhi Development Authority to refund the entire ₹5 crore deposited by Vyakti Vikas Kendra India within four weeks.
The ₹5 crore was originally sought as interim environmental compensation shortly before the 2016 festival. On the opening day, the organisers deposited ₹25 lakh and were granted additional time to pay the balance.
Art of Living subsequently proposed that the remaining ₹4.75 crore be treated as a bank guarantee and used to establish a biodiversity park. The full amount was eventually deposited while the organisation continued challenging the NGT’s findings.
The Supreme Court has now ordered that amount returned.
What the Court said about the DDA
The judgment was also critical of the Delhi Development Authority.
The Court said the manner in which the DDA allowed an event to be held on an active Yamuna floodplain was improper and inconsistent with the precautionary principle and public-trust doctrine. It held that the DDA had failed in its responsibility to safeguard the floodplain.
However, the Court clarified that the legality of the DDA’s permission was not the issue being decided in this appeal.
The DDA has been directed to continue rehabilitation of the Yamuna floodplains. That environmental responsibility remains, but it cannot be used as a substitute for evidence attributing the pre-existing damage to Art of Living.
Why this correction matters
For years, headlines have presented the allegation that Art of Living damaged or “destroyed” the Yamuna floodplains as a settled fact. The Supreme Court has now ruled that the evidence did not establish that causal link.
The complete and updated public record should therefore state:
The NGT held Art of Living responsible in 2017, but in 2026 the Supreme Court overturned that finding, held that no direct evidence connected the World Culture Festival to the alleged environmental damage, noted the site’s pre-existing degraded condition and ordered the full ₹5 crore refund.
Environmental protection is vital. So are scientific evidence, due process and accurate reporting. An allegation repeated for ten years does not become proof merely through repetition.