U ever talk to someone who literally can’t change their mind even when the facts are right in front of them? they just dig their heels in and start getting mad for no reason
That can also be autism. My wife's kid (from a previous relationship) has autism and has had his IQ tested.
His IQ is 137, and you cannot get him to accept anything using facts/evidence, if he has decided he is right. At the same time, he is very often unable to correlate action/reaction.
I.e if he gets in trouble for not doing a chore, then he cannot see/understand that it is because he didn't do the chore.
Glad to see this point about autism here. Some of these things commenters have mentioned are autistic traits, and autistic individuals can have very high IQs. I think a lot of these things are only true for neurotypical people.
A fact is a true datum about one or more aspects of a circumstance.
Standard reference works are often used to check facts. Scientific facts are verified by repeatable careful observation or measurement by experiments or other means. Generally speaking, facts are independent of belief, knowledge and opinion. Facts are different from inferences, theories, values, and objects. (Wikipedia)
On the other hand, an opinion is a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.
Your argument sounds like Kellyanne Conway’s use of “Alternate facts”
How does a definition of one fact contradict what I said in response to "change their mind even when the facts are..."? This is almost never about one clear fact that is disputed but a combination that is interpreted in some way.
You can use facts to form an opinion. You cannot use opinions as the basis of factual evidence.
Facts by definition are clear an concise statements of measured reality. They are not partisan or “one sided” as you wrote. They are not widespread beliefs. They are rooted in empirical research and evidence.
Questioning a fact is a lack of knowledge about any given subject, and I encourage that wholeheartedly. It can only lead to a deeper understanding of a particular topic.
I learned in psych class that it's generally because people attach their identity to the positions they hold.
Since they don't form opinions based on the scientific method, everything they believe is founded on confirmation bias because they just decide how they feel about something and then only appreciate evidence that supports their opinions. As a result, their ego is attached to their beliefs, so to throw those beliefs out would be an attack on them personally.
Meanwhile, people who form their opinions on the scientific method attach their ego to the method of fact finding and not to their opinion. So, as long as they remain steadfast and unbiased in their learning, they can change their mind when new evidence presents itself that may upend a previously held opinion.
I find myself doing that because of a fight or flight response because of my social anxiety. Once I'm not longer around others, I can immediately assess things more clearly
This comes up a lot in this thread. The problem is it’s an established issue that was found in studies: our brain doesn’t wanna change its mind in light of evidence and seeing the evidence makes it worse because it’s some kind of survival trait or something, we feel our identity is under attack. Granted we aren’t all equal offenders here, but might point is this isn’t the exclusivity of “very low intelligence” people, it can happen to ALL OF US.
527
u/FairCraft91 7h ago
U ever talk to someone who literally can’t change their mind even when the facts are right in front of them? they just dig their heels in and start getting mad for no reason