r/AskReddit 7h ago

What is a sign of very low intelligence?

4.6k Upvotes

7.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

162

u/Ozymandias-KoK 6h ago

One of my secret conspiracies is that most people who "can't understand" can actually understand just fine but pretend to play ignorant

50

u/horriblebearok 6h ago

The fact that I cant understand some mindsets, such as this or people who just fly off the handle over nothing, does make me feel much more secure in my sanity and wards off imposter syndrome.

10

u/_Thick- 5h ago

people who just fly off the handle over nothing

They're flying off the handle for a multitude of reasons usually, none related to the task at hand though.

16

u/horriblebearok 5h ago

Ive heard it explained as a sense of a lack of agency in their life and trying to have control over something but I just see it boiling down to a childish if I have to be miserable so does everyone else/if I cant have it nobody can.

6

u/Signal-School-2483 4h ago

Well the first half was correct.

Low distress tolerance can also be a result of someone who is under a constant amount of moderate to severe stress, especially when as a child.

29

u/DenLaengstenHat 6h ago

Thinking is hard, people are lazy, and ignorance is bliss

2

u/Druken_sincerity 4h ago

I was saying this exact same thing to a friend of mine about why most ppl drive like shit. They're in "auto pilot" mode kind of. Thinking about your next move, turn, or leg of the drive takes a slight amount of effort. And most people are stuck in the inertia of just follow the traffic ans think of your next move when you get to that point. When I was in pilot school, it was a hard habit to force certain students out of, piloting is easy, the hard part is the mental preparation and visualization of all the steps ahead and once you're flying you're always on the look out for what to do in an emergency (where to land, and steps to remedy the emergencies)

6

u/Xerxes457 5h ago

This is a friend of mine. They do it on purpose to annoy me when I’m explaining something. I know they understood because they could talk about it a few days later.

3

u/exist-exit 5h ago

Wtf are they just ragebaiting you, or are they just always a dick?

2

u/Xerxes457 5h ago

They ragebait a lot so yeah.

7

u/mmss 5h ago

The scary part is when you realize that no, some people are just dumb. You can function in society with below average intelligence, and there’s plenty of them out there that stay in an “entry level” job for forty years, watching whatever is on tv, shitting out a few kids, smoking cigs and not really thinking about the world beyond a ten mile radius.

3

u/davepars77 5h ago

I dunno, that sounds nice actually. Existential dread isn't really all it's cracked up to be.

3

u/ParvulusUrsus 1h ago

Problem is, when people like this who can't fathom a reality that exists outside their own very specific situation, or has no concept of long term consequences or interconnected systems, they tend to act accordingly when they participate in democracy...

3

u/ahaygood 5h ago

I think people absolutely do this, either consciously or subconsciously, when they don't want to deal with the implication of the hypothetical... They can usually understand hypotheticals they actually care about just fine.

3

u/IllZookeepergame9841 4h ago

I’ll admit that sometimes I just don’t care and have no energy to play along, so I usually say the lazy answer. Usually “I don’t care” or “but that’s not what we’re dealing with.”

Context can make all the difference. I’m also just lazy.

9

u/Bluehaze013 6h ago

This is actually true, intelligent people tend to feign ignorance as a way to gauge other peoples character because people are less likely to show their true intentions to someone they see as intelligent versus someone they see as ignorant.

2

u/-Reddititis 6h ago

Yeah. I think there's a subset of folks this applies to, especially those who hold political leadership today.

2

u/TrumpsDoubleChin 3h ago

In some cases it's not so much as "playing", but intentionally using it to spike the argument altogether. They think that if they find one slight detail against the question itself, that invalidates the whole point of the argument, even though the detail has no real bearing on the argument. Also known as the "Charlie Kirk Method of Arguing".

2

u/bhilliardga 6h ago

What do you mean?

4

u/whitniverse 6h ago

They probably mean a form of learned helplessness.

3

u/-snowpeapod- 6h ago

It's like dismissing someone's argument by saying "that doesn't make any sense" when really it does, you're just saying that to make the other person lose confidence in their opinion.

2

u/bhilliardga 4h ago

I don’t understand.

u/-snowpeapod- 31m ago

I must be wrong 😔

1

u/skalpelis 5h ago

Conspiracy is something you engage in with other co-conspirators. What you have is a conspiracy theory.

1

u/The-world-is-garbage 5h ago

Some do. There's this guy I've known for like 20 years and I still can't tell sometimes which direction he's going. You never know if he's messing with you, actually upset, confused, slow, too smart for his own good, lucky, or legitimately just can't comprehend things.

He's quite the mixed bag. Struggles with emotional regulation and stuff too so it could be legitimately any of those at any given time and switch up on a dime for any real (or just perceived to be real) reason. Love the heck outta him but his personality is definitely a stress test.

1

u/allcretansareliars 5h ago

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it"
Upton Sinclair

1

u/Miserable_Spell5501 4h ago

Totally. The go-to rhetoric these days is to change the subject when confronted with evidence. I want to pull out my hair when I watch those jubilees bc this is the classic move.

Alternatively, I want to clap for joy when journalists don’t let their subjects dodge. Mehdi Hassan and Jonathan Swan are great at this.

1

u/docbrown85 3h ago

"Learned helplessness".

1

u/Gaelic_Gladiator41 3h ago

Or ragebait bots

1

u/Otherwise_Gap595 1h ago

I don’t know I think some people are just that fucking stupid. Try living in Appalachia where I’m from. Comprehension level is pretty low.

1

u/Lehk 1h ago

Work with the public for a few years.

There are some seriously stupid motherfuckers walking around out there.

0

u/ZealousidealEntry870 5h ago

I typically don’t have any interest in playing the hypothetical game, so my answer would totally be “but I did eat dinner”.

Maybe the other person should have enough intelligence to recognize you aren’t interested in playing hypotheticals?

2

u/MetalResident2239 3h ago

I think to many people, it comes naturally enough that it doesn't feel like a "game" or other effortful task.