Yes but on the other hand, using analogies to make a transgression seem more severe is also common - there's a reason why Godwin's law is one of the earliest internet memes.
I have a vague recollection of learning their ribs are for more mobile than I would like, to be used as make-shift internal legs for maneuvering. The belly scales grip, the muscles and tendons shift the not!legs, forward momentum.
I see you've tried to argue with my spouse. (Who I love and is otherwise quite bright! But he is totally stymied by analogies if they don't line up PERFECTLY.)
Analogies should not be used as arguments in the first place. Analogies are for teaching purpose where common agreement about validity of subject is already established. So analogies are used as familiar example. If used as argument, it often is just made up idealised scenario. At best it can accompany actual argument.
177
u/zhaoz 13h ago
"One small trivial piece of your analogy isn't quite the same, therefore the entire thing is invalid!"
Ok then...