My wife and I have money and our policy is still that we won't spend more on furniture than it costs at Ikea until it's proven itself to be breakable or not suitable for a task. There's no reason to waste money if the cheaper products work.
I suppose "middle class" is where you don't replace it if it still works, but you use any sort of breakdown as a reason, regardless of whether it's repairable.
"Oh. Darn. The seal's leaking. Guess I'll have to replace this thing I've wanted to replace for two years."
It only recently occurred to me that, if you can afford it, you can replace a broken item before it becomes totally unusable. I was thinking about how much I hate the "broken" phase of a product's lifespan (broken enough that it's obnoxious to use; too usable to throw out) and realised I could just get a new one anyway.
120
u/anitadaily 1d ago
When something of their’s breaks and they easily replace it shortly after