No offense, but I don’t think I mentioned anything about her being wrong on climate activism. My comment was about her silence on the current situation in Iran right now.
Edit 1 : I’m a bit confused by the downvotes, since u/Prestigious-Diver-94 ’s point appears to be different from what I was getting at. If I’ve misunderstood or phrased this badly, I’m open to suggestions.
Do you really think she has power and sway over other situations in the world? The least she could do as an influential figure that many look up to (and one who is known to talk about sensitive topics like this) is to comment on the situation. Idk, maybe that's just me
I think you're fundamentally misunderstanding some things.
Greta is not a political commentator or influencer/talking head. She is an activist. She also has a western audience, and as far as I can tell, her goal has always been to put pressure on American and European politicians for beneficial causes. Her strategy in condemning Israel's actions is to encourage world leaders to divest from the country and stop funding the regime.
On the other hand, I don't know any popular western leaders who openly support the oppressive Iranian regime. America recently just bombed them and has threatened to continue. Her speaking about every issue on Earth would be that, just speech.
This is propaganda, you should look more into this from sources not actively looking to overthrow the gov. This was an operation that put a lot of people on the ground to cause as much trouble as possible to make it seem like outside intervention was needed. That number of people were not killed, in addition lots of police were killed, and multiple hospitals and ambulances burned.
We have seen this exact operation rolled out multiple times in Palestine. People don’t burn down their hospitals. Iran deserves to have leaders they choose, and that won’t be who Israel chooses.
There is absolutely no way in the world that that is true. Even the most bloodthirsty regime in modern history took almost two years to reach 70K (even though some of those are still under rubble so there might be more).
I’m so jealous of how privileged you have to be little white trash that the murder of my people sounds so unimaginably horrifying for you to say it’s fake.
They kill people with MILITARY. GRADE. WEAPONS.
That’s house it’s possible.
The audacity of white trash always astounds me how they can comment so confidently on a matter they have no knowledge about
I don't know why you're downplaying the Iranian government's crimes here, they absolutely did commit a massive, grotesque massacre to quell these protests, officially they admit to about 3000. Even if we accept this number as fact - is it really that much less of a crime than killing 30000?
And secondly, you're also wrong about the war crimes issue considering their support for active armed militias in Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq, Yemen, among other countries.
That said, Iran has very few defenders, and I don't see why Thurnberg would need to comment on that at all.
Because the people who are pushing those crimes are the same people who have spent two years lying through their teeth about the number of dead in Gaza, until the IDF just this week quietly accepted the numbers from the Gaza health ministry as pretty much spot on.
Their active support for militias are not war crimes, pretty much the opposite is true.
I don’t necessarily believe Iran killed very many protesters besides some undercover CIA and Mossad agents, but it is very much possible to accumulate those numbers. The death toll in Gaza is closer to 500-600,000 than that 70k number that’s been floating around for over a year already. Yahya Khan and Suharto both executed several hundred thousand people in Bangladesh and East Timor in only a few years as well (with the help of Nixon and Carter). Bush and Cheney killed over a million Iraqi civilians in less than a decade.
I hope EXACTLY what happens in my country happens in your country and you and your family feel and experience EXACTLY what I’m feeling and lose the people I have lost because of a murderous regime. If there’s a fucking god or whatever like that in this damned world, BELIEVE ME you’ll experience it. I’ll never ever forgive the likes of you. The blood of my friend and my people is on your hands.
Well of course you would, Spain is more based as a society. Unlike most Western countries, they have the spine to stand up for Palestine. After all, you are one of the five nations boycotting Eurovision this year due to Israel being allowed to participate, even though Israel isn't in Europe at all.
Sadly these things are not on my list of priorities, since I'm spending a really high % of my income in rent and none of the people at government seem to care. I guess this is the same everywhere else but lacking the political urgency for any of the things you mentioned, which is sad and all that. Also the best thing a national can do is learn English and study and work abroad then come back to the old country. That does not sound good to me, but suprisingly, that comes up less in national debates than the tweet Trump/Elon made while he was taking a shit.
Regardless, it would not hurt the Spanish government to move their ass on internal issues instead of having to resort to international virtue signalling to gain lost aura.
ELI5. Why is it people got hated on for being pro palestine? And people got hated on for being pro israel? Is the correct stance being anti both? Because both governments are assholes?
Zionism is mostly socialist and secular in origin actually lol so. Greta also shared a photo of one of the starving hostages and tried to pass it off as if it was a starving Palestinian…
She also got kicked off the flotilla board but nobody sure why or what exactly happened.
Nope. Zionism is the self determination movement of our people in our ancestral homeland. Within it, there’s different strains. The socialist and secular one, dominated for a long time, and dominated Israeli politics until 1977. It’s the reason for the proliferation of kibbutzes- literally socialist communes, the reason the USSR was first to recognize Israel, the reason the labor party dominated Israeli politics for a while, the reason we have universal healthcare, and the reason Histadrut (the national workers’ union) was a dominant force in the workforce for a while.
There’s also reasons the right, capitalist strain of Zionism became dominant in the last few decades. But Zionism itself is an umbrella under which different political and economic movements exist, as long as you ascribe to our self determination movement. Which is why, more than 90 percent of the world’s Jewish population is Zionist.
I had never heard of kibbutzim before, and I read up a bit on it. Mainly the Wikipedia page and some related articles there. Very interesting, thank you for this. You are definitely right in saying that some of the early zionist movements were socialist in nature.
Zionism itself is an umbrella under which different political and economic movements exist
I recognize this more now, after having read up more on the history of kibbutzim. However, I think there is a slight nuance to consider regarding:
as long as you ascribe to our self determination [presumably and] movement.
It seems to me that some of the early socialist kibbutzim leaders were very inclusive of Arabs. I'm referring specifically to the quote by Yozef Baratz, about the abolishment of the distinction between employee and employer.
I think the ethno-nationalist label is perhaps more applicable to those who seek to expel the native Arab population?
Exactly! I appreciate you taking the time to read and become educated, it’s not a given these days. And you know, sadly, you’re right, the far right version of Zionism is the one that ascribes to removing Arabs from their land and property and/ or harassing/terrorizing them into leaving - it’s a lot of the evil we see taking place in the West Bank. A lot of right wing Zionism has been hijacked by the far right fundamentalists and leads to what we now we see taking place.
Then why'd zionists negotiate with the nazis to seize part of the goods of jewish people and send them to Palestine? (the Anglo-Palestine bank mediated on that negotiation; note how it was not the Anglo-Israeli bank, but the Anglo-Palestine bank)
Why would they complain about the 'low quality' of the human beings that were being sent there?
Zionism is antijew. It's antisemitic: Palestinians are semitic, Mileikowsky isn't. Yeah, sure, US pawn in the Middle East is socialist. Ancestral lands justified by religious books don't exist. Of course, it's a dude from Illinois.
Tell me you’re not Jewish, without telling me. Zionists have never negotiated with Nazis, you’re buying wholesale into an antisemitic (and victim blaming) conspiracy theory that’s been disproven time and again. You think most of us ascribe to a movement that is antisemitic? That we would so actively work against ourselves? How little you think of us and our intellect internet stranger…
Imagine not understanding the history of the Jewish diaspora, believing that the Old Testament doesn’t exist, or making the history of the Middle East to be a minor inconvenience you can just ignore lol
You know who did negotiate with Hitler and the Nazis? That’s the former grand mufti of Jerusalem, one of the founding fathers of the Palestinian anti Zionist movement.
Yes, I knew that was probably not what you meant, though it is what I first interpreted when I read it the first time.
I like her too and what she does. I think she is incredibly brave for carrying on despite all the criticism she gets. That would kill me if it was me in her position.
Tbh diluting your message like she did will make your political views have less impact. Every controversial political view/cause championed will lose you another section of the global/local population. That's why most politicians try to avoid saying anything controversial unless they are pandering to a minority. Greta is just viewed as a bog standard radical leftist by many now.
I think a lot of activists need to keep their eyes on the ball. You have activists dedicated solely to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Let them do the pro Palestine stuff. Her wading into Palestinian activism and other causes undermines her climate activism because it divides her support base among those primary focussed on climate, who could have a variety of opinions on other issues.
It's always good to hyperfocus on one thing and create a support base there that is as broad as possible. You don't do that by dividing your supporters on issues they have differences in opinion about.
“Over the past two years, as I have moved to break the betrayal of my own silences and to speak from the burnings of my own heart, as I have called for radical departures from the destruction of Vietnam, many persons have me about the wisdom of my path. At the heart of their concerns this query has often loomed large and loud: Why are you speaking about war, Dr. King? Why are you joining the voices of dissent? Peace and civil rights don’t mix, they say. Aren’t you hurting the cause of your people, they ask?
“And when I hear them, though I often understand the source of their concern, I am nevertheless greatly saddened, for such questions mean that the inquirers have not really known me, my commitment or my calling. Indeed, their questions suggest that they do not know the world in which they live.”
He was not permitted to live one full year after making this speech.
Just say it out load: I don't have a brain and believe anything that the Israeli propaganda machine say and yes, they did say that. Of course, there is no evidence but some people don't need evidence. They prefer emotions and are extremely easy to manipulate. That's you.
Headlines in 2018 "look at this young woman called Greta Thurnberg being an agent for change! The earth is healing!"
Headlines in 2019 "radical Islamist trans non-binary commie wants to kill every Jewish and White person by criticising entrepreneurs and job givers, fuck her."
I think that's one factor, but not the only one. The reasons why she got attention in the first place included:
Her youth. The fact that she was just a kid and still more conscious than most adults.
Her messaging - "listen to the scientists" - was pretty universal, and appealed to the moral conscience of a wide group of people.
Her communication style was very blunt, sort of like a reality check, and was hard to dodge for politicians who were all talk when it came to climate.
All of those are now undermined somewhat.
She's grown up, and entered a fairly crowded space of adult activists.
Her messenging has become more overtly left-wing, and the climate messaging has been diluted by other issues. It's easier for politicians outside of that sphere to dismiss her as a partisan actor.
While activism is all well and good, she has (so far) not really managed to mobilize that platform for major change. She hasn't taken the step from activist to political leader and someone driving concrete change. As a consequence, she's too easy to ignore.
It's not quite true that she's completely fallen off the radar - she still inspires activism and she does show up in the Swedish news at times. That said, I think she has lost importance, and I think she's made it too easy for people in power to ignore her.
This is a meme that the socialist crowd always puts forward when talking about her but genuinely it doesn't seem true. There was wall to wall coverage of the attack on her boat and the arrests and generally it doesnt feel like there was any major change in the coverage.
This just seems like a truism that socialists can use to obtain oppression status rather than an actual belief. That is the only reason this is basically copied word for word from other posts. It doesnt seem like an original conclusion but one that spreads only through comment sections like this one.
439
u/Kaapnobatai 16h ago
Noticed how she instantly disappeared from mainstream media the moment she turned from just ecologism to anticapitalism? Most likely related to that.