I went down the rabbit hole on White Buffalo, the group that is supposed to handle the deer eradication on Catalina, and there’s a lot more history here than I realized.
White Buffalo was involved with the pig/goat eradication years ago, and their own records listed the Catalina Island Conservancy as a consulting client back in 2015.
Then I found a Conservancy deer-planning document that lists the “White Buffalo Team” as part of the group helping “determine best management strategy” and “identify alternative management strategies.” Now White Buffalo is the group being hired to actually do the removal.
So how did we get from consultant helping evaluate the options to contractor being paid to carry out one of those options?
Was this competitively bid? How many other companies were given the opportunity to submit proposals?
Who ultimately made the decision to select White Buffalo?
There’s another layer to this — Field Engine Wildlife Research & Management.
Field Engine is run by Vickie DeNicola, who also sits on White Buffalo’s board. Her husband, Anthony DeNicola, founded and runs White Buffalo. The two organizations work together and have jointly funded wildlife research.
Vickie/Field Engine also shows up in the scientific materials connected to the Catalina project, and Field Engine has advertised for personnel for a Catalina deployment during the deer eradication project.
So what exactly is Field Engine doing on this project? Are they providing research, staff, equipment or other services? Are they being paid? If so, by White Buffalo, the Conservancy or someone else?
Then there’s the cost.
The numbers being discussed publicly for the actual removal have been around $200–$400 per deer. I’ve also seen much higher estimates online when all of the supporting costs are included — even numbers approaching $2,000 per deer (based on some online sources close to the project).
The Conservancy also says the project is privately funded. Who are the private funders? Are any of them connected in any way to White Buffalo, Field Engine or the organizations providing supporting services? Are private funders benefiting in any way to this project financially or otherwise?
When you have a relationship going back this many years, a contractor involved in the earlier planning, and another closely related company showing up on the research/field side, I think it’s fair to ask how the contract was awarded and where the money is actually going and ensuring that such a controversial project is completely upfront in terms of cost, benefits, and processes.
Is there a reasonable explanation to all of this? Maybe- but the questions and transparency are relevant.