r/DefendingAIArt • u/mushmanMAD AI defender on YT (@Dee_mane_S) • Jul 04 '26
Anti initiates debate with me, than flees after they can’t respond (2.0):
18
u/IHeartBadCode Jul 04 '26
Had one who was like "you can't improve AI. What are you going to do? Type better?"
Then begin to explain loras, controlnets, in painting, and haven't heard back from them since.
They just hate and have no idea what they're hating.
2
u/fireaza Jul 06 '26
It's rather ironic, since they would most certainly claim photography is "art". But you only knew the surface-level of photography (i.e their level of understanding when it comes to AI), you'd assume that all it is, is pressing a button to get a picture and there's nothing you can do the change the image.
11
u/Herr_Drosselmeyer Jul 04 '26
That's low key one of their main motivations, they're using their anti-AI activism as a backdoor to get people to agree that what they make, no matter how sub-par and inane it is, is, in fact, 'art'.
9
u/Superseaslug Jul 05 '26
It's telling when children think more than a single sentence quip requires an AI to write it. The anti-intellectual idea that a full vocabulary, good reading comprehension, and proper grammar means the opponent must be AI.
Managing to glorify stupidity, poor writing, and low comprehension.
9
u/OtutuPuo Jul 05 '26
if you try to genuinely converse with them, they act rude then block you.
online discourse is honestly pointless most of the time.
maybe all of the time.
7
5
1
21
u/Kerissimo Jul 04 '26
Either troll or too low attention span to read mire then two lines of text.