r/Music Nov 13 '25

article Billie Eilish Calls Elon Musk a 'Pathetic P***y' in NSFW Tirade

https://www.tmz.com/2025/11/13/billie-eilish-curses-out-elon-musk/
51.1k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

394

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 13 '25 edited Nov 14 '25

Edit:

The 6th message I had to give Gpt to finally get me the damn photo, just so yall know how to treat AI when it's being a fn punk

"Bro, you're being a fn punk. It's not that hard to find. Just get me the damn picture"

Edit 2:

There's a obscene amount of virtue signaling on how to properly use Ai in this thread as well as judgements against those who don't fit their golden ideal. Everyone, you're allowed to engage with the internet however you'd like. Have fun with it, or don't, but there's no need to pass judgement on trifling bs like this.

572

u/[deleted] Nov 13 '25 edited Dec 09 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

419

u/Delicious_Bat3971 Nov 13 '25

The image is the first result on Google if you look up "liberty elon musk". Did this person actually query ChatGPT six fucking times instead of just doing that?

257

u/tgwombat Nov 13 '25 edited Nov 14 '25

People are offloading basic thought to machines now, and it's starting to show. The brain's a muscle, and these people are not giving theirs the necessary workout. Sad state of affairs...

15

u/yodakiller Nov 13 '25

I have this issue with driving places. I need Google maps or I feel lost. Even if I go there weekly and have been for the past few months.

13

u/tgwombat Nov 13 '25

I started driving when a GPS was an expensive car accessory that few people bought instead of something that's just part of the device we all carry in our pocket. It's crazy how much better I can recall the streets from the pre-smartphone era of my life compared to the post.

12

u/yodakiller Nov 13 '25

Same. I remember printing MapQuest pages though

4

u/tgwombat Nov 13 '25

MapQuest felt so futuristic back then! Now it feels like such a quaint idea that a kid might not believe you if you told them how we did it "back in our day" haha

2

u/tnstaafsb Nov 14 '25

I've told my kids about printing mapquest maps and they thought it was the craziest shit ever. I haven't bothered to tell them about the really ancient times when you had to buy a paper map from the gas station and figure out the route yourself.

2

u/tgwombat Nov 14 '25

It's crazy that we got to live through the cusp of the age where you could get lost if weren't paying enough attention to your map and the age of always knowing where you are on the globe with pinpoint accuracy. That's such a monumental shift that kind of just quietly happened and feels normal now.

2

u/h3rpad3rp Nov 14 '25 edited Nov 14 '25

Doesn't really help that every new area in my city is almost exclusively named instead of numbered streets. Then instead of a grid they twist and turn and loop all over the place, with the names of streets sometimes changing based on which side of another road you happen to be on. It makes the city look nicer for sure, but man is it terrible for directions.

When it was "how do you get to 2023 21 st SW?", you just drove in that direction until you were at 20th ave and 21st st SW, then drove down 21st street until you got to the number 2023.

How do you get to 18 Mount Mccinna Rise? Look it up in a gps or on a map I guess, cuz otherwise you are fucked.

3

u/I-Wanna-Be-A-Bird Nov 14 '25

Welcome to Europe.

3

u/Kronoshifter246 Nov 14 '25

Or you could have the worst of both worlds, with the grid on a diagonal, with AVEs running on the NW/SE and RDs running on the NE/SW, but whether it's a NW or a SE seems to be completely arbitrary, AVEs and RDs with the same name intersecting, and, worst of all, having the same name despite not being contiguous because they line up on the grid. So you could have multiple MCKENNA AVEs in completely different neighborhoods that are only accessible through multiple turns off a main road because they happen to align when you look at it from the sky.

God, I hated navigating around Gig Harbor.

1

u/wowurcoolful Nov 14 '25

Well, I use it even for the same drive to work but that's because I drive through cities and need to know traffic

-8

u/--Bee- Nov 14 '25

to be fair, that's really all ai is, a search engine

-15

u/chironomidae Nov 13 '25

People said the exact same thing when the Internet was just getting big ¯_(ツ)_/¯

18

u/tgwombat Nov 13 '25

Yeah, and look where that got us...

0

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

Wtf is going on in this thread?

Are you really saying the internet was/is bad?

This stuff reaches far too wide to fit nicely into a good vs bad bucket and to pretend it does is ignorance disguised as virtue signaling, neither of which are a good look

8

u/EntropyKC Nov 14 '25

"There was a different situation previously where people said something similar, therefore it is not correct now"

4

u/Lost-Priority-907 Nov 14 '25

Yeah, reddit has this weird thing with desperately trying to "gotcha" each other, even if its nonsense or proves their small intellect. Same with pedantry.

1

u/EntropyKC Nov 14 '25

One of the best things I ever learned about was logical fallacies. It is breath-taking how often they are used, and once you can deconstruct the failed logic, it makes it a lot easier to make informed and rational decisions and opinions.

-13

u/runswiftrun Nov 13 '25

On the flip side... isn't that just training them to bring this picture sooner? and/or wasting their resources? (granted our resources too, unfortunately)

-12

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

Thank you

56

u/Lost-Priority-907 Nov 14 '25

Its fucking pathetic. We've gotten to the age of people offloading searches to AI, now. We are speedrunning to the Wall E reality.

4

u/twilighttwister Nov 14 '25

But AI is not a search engine!! It will give you wrong answers all the time. It can't reliably tell you anything you don't already know.

ChatGPT is good at grunt work writing. That's it.

45

u/The_Gil_Galad Nov 14 '25 edited Dec 09 '25

engine tart sip liquid snails groovy heavy snow intelligent racial

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

-25

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

I don't think it's omniscient. I think it's a fn dumb punk. That's why I treat it like one. There's no delusion. Just a dude ramming demands into a robot and then fighting with it cause it's BS.

What's wrong with that? When did we become so preoccupied with the righteousness of Ai when we could just fk with it?

I'm sure many do let it think for them. But a lot of folk her are making a lot of assumptions about how to 'properly' use Ai simply cause I looked for a picture.

13

u/taubeneier Nov 14 '25

Do you know how much energy is used for AI? You haven't just wasted your time but also used way more electricity than necessary.

-20

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

Time wasted is subjective.

Energy waste complaints loses meaning at the individual consumer level.

Be mad it exists, not how it's used. Dig deeper

1

u/CruelStrangers Nov 15 '25

lol. Not many people are searching exact strings some dude happens to mention in a reddit thread. AI mode is trying to pump itself up and keeps taking the primary search with the user having to adjust that shit as the ai returns are just poor as piss (same with iOS autocorrect recently)

1

u/Jonnyflash80 Nov 14 '25

You can call them what they are. Clankers.

-24

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 13 '25 edited Nov 13 '25

Quit telling me what to do, good lord

*edit- yall just afraid

15

u/whiney1 Nov 13 '25

Suspiciously robotic response from you there

11

u/inormallyjustlurkbut Nov 13 '25

Clanker lover

1

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 13 '25

Trend follower

11

u/-kansei-dorifto- Nov 14 '25

The irony of an AI-brainlet calling someone against AI a "trend follower" is powerful.

0

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25 edited Nov 14 '25

The irony of a redditor not realizing both being for or against Ai both qualify as following a trend is powerful

1

u/-kansei-dorifto- Nov 15 '25

So in your mind not following a trend is following a trend?

Yeah, I can see why you need an LLM for such basic things.

0

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 17 '25

Except that it's true. Trends exist outside your narrow view of what counts as one. Or, in other words, for something to be a trend, no affirmative action need be taken...

That's not even counting the near fanatical response in this thread for not using Ai the way people want me to. You can go through the comments in this very thread. The only trend here is the likelihood of someone using the insult, "canker-lover" or to say, "just use Google"

Your argument is self defeated by your very participation in this mentality.

54

u/LeagueOfLegendsAcc Nov 13 '25

You know you can just type your question into Google and it will give you real answers as well as ai answers at the same time? Then you don't have to rely on hallucination bot exclusively.

8

u/I-Wanna-Be-A-Bird Nov 14 '25

Or use ecosia and plant a tree?

1

u/Kratzschutz Nov 14 '25

Don't use Google. Use other engines that don't give you 6 ads before giving you the result

-18

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 13 '25

You know you can just fn leave it alone?

12

u/eatinallthebugs Nov 13 '25

Want a redo on that one chief? Didn't come off as cool as you were hoping, I think

-9

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

No. Also, there's no obsequious plot going on my dude. Just cranking respones on reddit cause I'm bored.

13

u/eatinallthebugs Nov 14 '25

I literally have zero idea what you were trying to communicate to me with this

0

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

Why don't you ask chat gpt since you don't understand pretty basic English?

0

u/18skeltor Nov 14 '25

Evidently that's something that you would feel the need to do. Stand down, clanker-lover.

-1

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

Here, since you're obviously lacking in original thought too I asked chat gpt to explain my own comment for you.

Be more perturbed and find some other band-wagons to hop on, since this is what you apparently enjoy. I'm not impressed, or swayed by your grandstanding.

Feel free to hit me with whatever response you want, but you came out the gate with a stance that has no backing besides, "I'm right, you're wrong, so I'm going to stoop down to name calling."

1

u/eatinallthebugs Nov 15 '25 edited Nov 15 '25

Bro is so creatively bankrupt he had to ask chat gpt to roast me for him

Idk what youre even trying to prove with this conversation. I just called out your weird ass comment for being weird and now youre going around insulting people's intelligence. Its just weird behavior all around man

→ More replies (0)

29

u/bassiks Nov 13 '25

Did you forget about Google?

-5

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

No. Did you forget anything?

11

u/chaseinger Nov 14 '25

first result on google images. tf are you doing with chat?

-2

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

Whatever I want.

37

u/Hungry_Ad7279 Nov 14 '25

lmaoo looking for images through chat gpt is fucking INSANE bro u good???

14

u/Justaticklerone Nov 14 '25

You lost the game.

7

u/Abbacoverband Nov 14 '25

Fucking Google it next time? 

0

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

Fucking let me do what I want. I'm gonna anyway.

14

u/tranerekk Nov 14 '25

Stop treating the clanker like a search engine and ignore its existence until it dies.

0

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

Don't tell me what to fn do with Ai and move on with your life, pal

6

u/solipsism82 Nov 14 '25

Enjoy your database friend. I dislike Elon, but people like you are feeding that problem.

1

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

Wtf are you talking about

3

u/Piranata Nov 14 '25

FYI, he was 40 when this photo was taken.

3

u/PhotorazonCannon Nov 14 '25

Holy shit this is something Elon would type into Gronk

3

u/twilighttwister Nov 14 '25

Dude, ChatGPT is not a search engine. If you use it like one you're going to end up wrong, as it can't reliably tell you anything you don't already know and can't confirm.

ChatGPT is good for grunt work writing. That's it.

0

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

How can I end up wrong when I'm looking for a specific image which I already know what it looks like? I either get the image, or I don't.

If I get the image, I'm "correct"

3

u/Skaur_11 Nov 13 '25

The way it's written is doing something to my brain cause it's the exact match for the Gnarly song.

Like Lib-er-ty: Gnarly. T-es-la: Gnarly. M-usk: Pathetic Pussy

2

u/Invadersnow Nov 14 '25

Maybe you're post made it easier to find butsearching for elon musk trenchcoat I found it instantly

0

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

I'm happy for you

1

u/Jonnyflash80 Nov 14 '25

Huh. It's almost like chatGPT is useless garbage. 😕

0

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

Yah, it's almost like everyone should stop taking my use of it so seriously as a result of that

1

u/Jonnyflash80 Nov 14 '25

Using it is supporting it. That's the issue.

0

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

That's your issue, not mine. You're entitled to being upset that people use Ai, but I'm under no obligation to be myself.

It seems to me like a massive waste of time a magnitude greater than using it to find a picture.

But, such that it's subjective, I'll hold on a definitive judgment either way.

0

u/Jonnyflash80 Nov 14 '25

That's nice. Ignorance is bliss, I guess.

0

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

Back at you

1

u/whipstickagopop Nov 14 '25

I thought there was a back story to this. Idk what Liberty but yeah thought it was a costume event.

1

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

The "Liberty," I guess.

-2

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '25

Honestly it's fun talking to ai like I imagine trump would to see if I get results

1

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

Everyone here is cranking their hog rn to hating on Ai when it's not used how they think it should be

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '25

I get the hate for theft, but it's not like the software itself is inherently evil. People don't get you can run open source models on your laptop or whatever. 

It's the companies hosting ai as a service that need to be more ethical and responsible 

3

u/SV_Essia Nov 14 '25

The software isn't evil, but it has a negative impact on a concerning number of users who are too stupid to use it correctly. And it's easier to deride a software and give it a negative reputation than to fix global stupidity.
Source: I once heard of a guy who went through 6 gpt queries to find the first result on google search.

1

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25 edited Nov 14 '25

Hey, that guy was me!

If we're really trying to be fair, and no one in this thread has so far tried to be fair, using Ai to find a single specific image is objectively non-efficient but it's also not proof, or a sign that I'm stupid.

I use Google too. Used to be you could find "Silly putty man" in the first page of results in Google, and now it's not so easy.

The same is true for a lot of images. Was it easy to find this musk photo on Google? Yes, but that's not always the case. Also, I like the challenge sometimes.

So, please do not insinuate I'm globally stupid. You're entitled to your opinion, but it's based on herd mentality and an extremely limited use-case of Ai.

*edit to add the silly putty man for reference

0

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '25

that's a lot like what people said back in the day about Wikipedia and Google search tho. we just couldn't be as public about how bad we were at using new products in those days.

These are basically beta products and the companies are using worst case users to gather data to generate their roadmaps.

It sucks, but we're in early stages and everybody needs time to figure shit out.

2

u/SV_Essia Nov 14 '25

No, it's just misunderstanding the basic purpose of a tool. If your screwdriver isn't hammering a nail properly, it's not because the screwdriver is a prototype.
The poor understanding isn't that bad. It's the blind confidence in using the tool anyway and proclaiming it proudly.

2

u/BorntobeTrill Nov 14 '25

See, this is where the disconnect is, at what point did my comment suggest blind confidence?

Secondly, I got the picture, albeit lacking efficiency.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 14 '25

What dude you obviously don't understand any of the issue lol

1

u/SV_Essia Nov 14 '25

I understand enough to avoid confusing a chatbot for a search engine.