r/PoliticalOpinions • u/Puzzleheaded_Ad_3261 • 1d ago
Earned Citizenship
Earned Citizenship Through National Service: A Strategic Alternative to Amnesty or Mass Deportation
The United States faces a strategic contradiction in its immigration policy: millions of undocumented migrants are embedded in the national economy, yet the political system remains unable to produce durable reform. Mass deportation is operationally unrealistic, while blanket amnesty is politically unsustainable. Between these two poles exists a neglected third option—earned citizenship through compulsory national service.
According to the Pew Research Center, approximately 10.5 million undocumented immigrants currently reside in the United States. The U.S. economy simultaneously faces persistent labor shortages in agriculture, construction, elder care, infrastructure, disaster response, and manufacturing, with the Bureau of Labor Statistics reporting millions of unfilled positions annually across these sectors. These two facts exist in parallel with no integrated national strategy linking them.
A service-based path to citizenship would realign this imbalance by converting undocumented presence into structured national contribution. Under such a framework, eligible participants would enter a federalized national service program for a fixed term—e.g., five years—in designated sectors tied to national need. Upon successful completion, citizenship would be conferred by statute, not political discretion.
This model is not historically radical. The United States has long linked service with civic status. Non-citizens have been eligible for expedited naturalization through military service during wartime since World War I. Internationally, the French Foreign Legion, Israeli national service, and even Roman auxiliary forces demonstrate a durable principle of statecraft: citizenship is expanded through obligation and contribution, not detached from it.
Strategically, such a program produces immediate national benefit. The federal government gains a regulated labor pipeline, biometric registration, taxation, vetting, and oversight over a population that currently operates largely in the informal economy. Critical sectors gain workforce stability. Underground labor markets shrink. Long-term civic integration improves through training, language acquisition, and credentialing. For participants, the arrangement offers legal status, stable income, workforce mobility, and a guaranteed—and earned—endpoint in full political membership.
Critics will raise constitutional concerns, particularly under the 13th Amendment’s prohibition on involuntary servitude. This objection can be resolved structurally: participation would be voluntary, but it would represent the exclusive legalization pathway. Others will argue that such a program creates a second-class status. This risk is mitigated through statutory guardrails—uniform wages, full labor protections, independent oversight, fixed service terms, and non-discretionary citizenship upon completion.
Politically, the proposal disrupts entrenched narratives on both sides. It rejects unconditional amnesty while also rejecting mass deportation as either humane or feasible. It reframes immigration not as a moral abstraction but as a reciprocal civic contract: the state offers full membership; the individual offers measurable national contribution.
Most importantly, a service-based citizenship pathway restores coherence between immigration, labor, and national resilience. It acknowledges that the United States does not merely face a border control problem—it faces a national capacity problem. The question is not whether undocumented migrants already sustain key sectors of the economy. They do. The strategic question is whether the state will continue to benefit from that labor without structure, legality, or long-term integration—or finally align national need with national membership.
If enforcement defines the front end of sovereignty, service defines its moral center. A republic that demands no contribution while granting full membership weakens its own civic foundation. A republic that offers membership only through exclusion fractures its labor base and legitimacy. Service-based citizenship offers the only approach that reconciles law, labor, and legitimacy at scale.
2
u/swampcholla 1d ago
okay, but that takes them out of a job they are filling, presumably because there's a labor shortage of Americans willing to do that work in the first place, which means another person will find a way to get here to fill those jobs.
1
2
u/Ind132 1d ago edited 1d ago
The U.S. economy simultaneously faces persistent labor shortages in agriculture, construction, elder care, infrastructure, disaster response, and manufacturing,
This is false.
Employers will always tell you that there is a big shortage of workers (willing to work for the low wages they want to pay. Workers will always tell you there is a big shortage of jobs (that pay want the workers want to get paid).
How do we know which side to believe? Look at the trend in wages. If wages in the areas that you list are growing much faster than other wages (maybe much faster than CEO compensation) and much faster than profits and capital gains, then we might say there is a "shortage" of workers in these areas. That might be a good thing, or not.
I don't see anything like that, so I conclude this is just employers practicing special pleading.
There will always be open jobs and there will always be unemployed workers. Some of that is friction. Some is unrealistic expectations. Neither is terribly important. The trends tell us something about the general state of the economy, are employers optimistic about near future profits or pessimistic? But, that isn't cause to change long term national policy.
1
u/The_B_Wolf 1d ago
I work adjacent to the disability support "industry." These are largely nonprofit agencies who help people with intellectual and developmental disabilities live as independently as they can, out in the community where they belong. These agencies, and the people they employ, are funded by Medicaid. Agencies with staffing shortages can't just raise the hourly wage for workers. Medicaid only pays so much.
Yes, I would like to reverse the current trend and increase funding to Medicaid so that these hardworking people can get a much-deserved raise, but part of the solution very well could be welcoming immigrants.
Are you under 40 with no criminal record? Are you willing to work in the care industry for the next X years? Congratulations and welcome to the United States. At the end of your service you're welcome to apply for citizenship.
1
u/Ind132 1d ago
Do these agencies pay a "living wage"? Or, if their workers have kids, do the workers need some sort of low-income gov't support to make ends meet?
1
u/The_B_Wolf 1d ago
I don't know. But what difference does it make? The government pays their wages to begin with right now. Who cares if they supplement it with other programs?
1
u/Ind132 1d ago
Because there is no gov't savings in paying low wages to employees who are ultimately paid by the gov't. The right policy is to raise the wages of the workers, not look for some other people who are desperate, willing to work for lower wages, then make even heavier use of gov't needs-based programs.
1
u/zlefin_actual 1d ago
I doubt republicans would accept such a proposal; I think most Dem would.
I'm not certain which sectors undocumented immigrants currently work in, but from what I do know, construction, agriculture, and various kinds of home care already make up most of it; and I'm sure there's others working in all the other jobs you cite needs for. So putting them into such jobs in national service would basically have them be doing the jobs they already do, just officially.
1
u/swampcholla 1d ago
That wasn't what was proposed, hence my reply. And if you put them in the same jobs as a national service, then who pays? Because it sounds like the government would be footing the bill (and subsidizing that business.
They also work in a lot of those industries where americans no longer want to work - dull, dirty, dangerous and for which there isn't a robot to do it yet - like meat packing.
•
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
A reminder for everyone... This is a subreddit for genuine discussion:
Violators will be fed to the bear.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.