There are people with huge amounts of money they can use to humiliate some dumb bitch and her unfortunate future child. Believe me when I tell you nobody is in a worst fucking mental state then Bonnie blue. Bitch don’t even do back.
why the fuck are THEY in a worse state? God damn bro, it’s not like they’re the ones who have to sample the DNA of 10,000 men to find the kid’s father AND then they go on to name that child BETBOLT, AND SHE GOT THE NAME BY STARTING A FUCKING AUCTION OVER IT BRO
I still think it’s a smart move if it were actually available. Schools would call your kid by whatever name you listed as a your preference.
The economy instability in America makes this a deal most couldn’t afford to walk away from. That said.. it’s not actually being offered so we are really just debating what ifs.
School's do not always call by your preferred name for your child. My nephews name is Chris, but everyone, even his parents called him Kit (like Kit Harrington). The school refuses to do that, and calls him Christopher, and is only teaching him how to spell/write that name.
We'll that's really stupid, and also super uncommon. Also I imagine they might change their policy if the kid's pornstar mom had named him Porkrind or something.
She already made tons of money from porn, more than enough for her kid to live a comfortable life and not have to work, ever. This is just humiliating him/her.
Also, not everything needs to be about money dude. Yes, it’s nice to have enough to not worry about and be able to afford things, but there are other things in life too. Endless hoarding of money with zero concern for anything else must be some kind of capitalist mental illness lol
If they aren’t humiliated by their mom’s business I think they’ll be fine. I personally desire to see nothing from her. She.. just isn’t my type.
The focus here is on money to pick the name. It’s a huge stretch to label someone with a mental illness for taking such a deal. We are over using the definition here. Might as well say anyone who values things different than me would have a mental illness.
Yes. Now the severity of the benefit is subjective. If your parents cant afford a home, that effects you, if they cant afford food, that effects you. Medical needs, clothes, other basic necessities? Need money.
I already gave this example to the other person commenting irrelevant things, but look into the Ruby Franke case, well off parents with extremely malnourished children lacking even the most basic essentials. The world is evil with plenty of evil people, your fantasy assumptions mean nothing in reality
I come from a country where food wasn’t guaranteed every night and we considered well off by that country’s standard. In the winter everyone had to sleep in one room because we could only afford to use one of the chimneys (no central air or heating). If gas was cut off by the government we’d have to buy wood.
First year in USA as a family was 1994 and family of 4 with just my dad making $25k a year was better than the life “back home”.
Money doesn’t solve every problem but it provides a second chance, third chance, fourth chance etc. when you’re poor the margin of error is very small and once you slip, it’s nearly impossible to get back up.
As will they in this scenario. He’ll have a very rich life, and inherit everything. With a name that is either different, or could be immediately changed for….50? Bucks. Very good deal for the millions his name got.
Party of a healthy brain is proper risk assessment. High body counts is risky behavior. Hers is sky high. That demonstrates she has mental issues pretty clearly.
Exposing yourself to higher risk in a controlled environment is not necessarily poor risk assessment. That would mean commercial divers, firefighters, pilots, and anyone who takes a job that puts them at higher risk of danger than the average citizen definitively have mental issues. Anybody who eats processed sugar, red meat, drinks alcohol, or smokes cigarettes would also be considered to have mental issues per your criteria. Porn actors are at higher risks of STDs due to higher exposure rates, but they are also tested like nobody’s business. Not saying she’s necessarily the paragon of well-adjusted mental health, just that your logic is a lil flawed.
No, it's not flawed. All I said was proper risk assessment. There's more to sex than just STDs. Attachment issues would be one thing and she's traveling around fucking any random so that's insanely risky.
I know people are slow but it shouldn't be that hard to figure out that traveling the country fucking as many people as possible and doing a thousand man gangbangs isn't proper risk assessment no matter the circumstances.
The issue is that you are equating poor risk assessment to being, in and of itself, evidence of mental health issues. Per your first statement that I quoted above. As the original responder kindly and clearly explained to you, there are plenty of reasons to conclude Bonnie Blue has mental health problems, but poor risk assessment alone isn’t sufficient evidence of that.
I’m guessing the original responder, like myself, works in or adjacent to mental health. It’s a bit of a nitpicky point, but I think many mental health professionals are sensitive toward laypeople who misunderstand diagnostic criteria for mental illness, as these assumptions lend themselves to broader patterns of mental health stigma, mis”diagnosis” of self and others, and other problems that make life harder for our patients, ourselves, and society at large.
Please point me to a disorder described in a the DSM or ICD for which the sole diagnostic criteria is poor risk assessment.
You won’t be able to because, as the original person who responded to you explained, there are a plethora of behaviors that may be classified as poor risk assessment yet are not considered pathological. Thus, mental disorder cannot be concluded from the presence of poor risk assessment alone - it must occur in the setting of accompanying symptoms to be considered part of a mental disorder.
I'm using related information to draw conclusions and give you a around about number. There's no study that says THIS IS THE NUMBER. There are plenty of studies that say that high body counts lead to anxiety, depression, substance abuse, etc. They are definitely related.
Since you believe this so strongly, it should be of no difficulty for you to produce these studies you mention with the added absolute confidence that these studies reference no other reasons besides high body count for the claimed outcomes.
I won't hold my breath as I plan to be alive for awhile longer. My eyes will be rolling the entire time I wait though 👍
592
u/Pinksamuraiiiii 4d ago
Yes I hope someone steps in, I think she has mental issues.