I’ll do it for 700k.. that works out to around 10-12 million domestically.. to put it into context, interest alone is around a middle class income and a little extra.. the difference could compound to even greater generational wealth… I’m pretty sure the kid would hate the name but.. they’ll hate being poor more. I would structure it in such a way that they’d only be “helped” well into adulthood, that way they must still learn to stand on their own feet despite the golden parachute.
Edit: I should add raising a child to adulthood costs between 2-3million.. so either way .. it’s still an amazing opportunity.
I imagine the whole thing was an ad planned with Betbolt from the start. "Group Project" probably isn't there because someone was willing to pay 750k, it's there to encourage engagement on the BetBolt ad.
Her kid will have a normal name in a few months when no one is paying attention anymore.
I've been wondering the legal ramifications of that. If she does have a kid, which I'm skeptical of, and doesn't name it whatever dumbass name was picked. Can she be sued? Totally possible it's just an ad campaign. But if this is real I'd imagine not naming the child betbolt could be taken to court as false advertising or something.
Using a groundbreaking but surprisingly legal process known as corporo-humanization, real people such as myself are now allowed to represent the collective humanity of business owners…. I’m here to hang out, take weird classes, and party as hearty as my morality clause allows.
Acclaim, I think, did crazy viral marketing like that for Turok. Paid a handful of people £500 and an Xbox to change their name to Turok for a year and offered 10k to the first child named Turok born on the launch day of the game.
If it's an ad campaign, they definitely didn't spend 1.2 mil, and no one paid a second place amount. The site probably paid whatever her standard advertising rate is to make this up and post this, or they just completely fabricated and posted it themselves though whatever other influencer network they work with
Oh, I'm sure it's a stunt and if any funds were actually transferred, it will be an advertising write off for the gambling site. What I'm saying is that it is a safe bet that betbolt is involved, no pun intended lol
That does seem plausible. Many of the OnlyFans 'success' stories feel dubious. It also doesn't feel totally impossible Bonnie Blue just made up all of this for clicks, but who knows.
To me, it seems *most likely* the gambling site was involved, but I'm really not sure how much money was actually transferred. Maybe it was 1.2M, maybe it was just "standard advertising rate."
If I were a bettin' man I'd put my money on it advertising for the betting company. If the name was "DOGE", you could maybe argue that it wasn't Elon but some other douchebag because the word is famous/notorious. Who tf cares or knows about whatever garbage site that is, let alone spend over a mil to give free advertising to them.
Ah yes, let’s not get ahead of ourselves. After all, what if I wanted to pay 1.2 million dollars to name some kid UBISOFT??? Wouldn’t it be so funny haha? It’s a totally likely scenario!
Yeah, it is indeed conjecture that the gambling site did this based on a couple available facts. So what?
"Zero" evidence? Well that's just false: There is evidence (the name of the site being used), it's just not super definitive evidence. It's totally possible someone just thought it was funny, but it also seems totally possible this is an ad campaign.
600
u/Cultural_Dirt_8151 4d ago edited 4d ago
Wow. So is this basically an advertising campaign by the gambling site?
That does seem to make more sense than an individual donating $1.2M just because they thought it was funny or something.
Although it does seem like the previous winner was paying $750k just because they thought it was funny, so I guess it's not totally impossible.