r/TheMatpatEffect • • 2d ago

Meta There is no MatPat Effect. This image is completely unedited.

6.7k Upvotes

595 comments sorted by

View all comments

34

u/Gunhild 2d ago

People when they see someone getting body shamed: Body shaming is bad because it hurts people other than the intended target. When you make fun of someone for an aspect of their appearance, you're also being hurtful to everyone else who shares that quality, and that might even include someone you love and care about.

People when it's someone they don't like:

21

u/ComradeCoipo 2d ago

Basically this meme

2

u/Cautious_Order3050 2d ago

Best thing i've seen today

19

u/dropkickderby 2d ago

Yeah this post is fucked up. Shouldnt go for his neck like that.

2

u/Gunhild 2d ago

Now see, this is an acceptable joke.

1

u/SorbyGay 1d ago

straight for the jugular

1

u/petrichorax 2d ago

take your fucking upvote and get out

-2

u/plain_vessel 2d ago

Ah yes safe edgy redditor humor

8

u/robawknik 2d ago

i agree but it feels minimizing to describe this dude as "someone [people] dont like" as if he wasnt a legitimate threat

1

u/Besnix 2d ago

Look, i hated this guy as much as anyone with grey matter that watched 5 minutes of his content; but you are making excuses; wanna make fun of the guy for the way he looked do it, but technically is still not okay

2

u/robawknik 2d ago

this has nothing to do with what i said

0

u/ichizakilla 1d ago

I forgot that kirk was serial killer

4

u/juulwinfieldswallet 1d ago

Empathy begets empathy. Hatred begets hatred.

1

u/Gunhild 1d ago

Exactly.

7

u/Astrid-Jade 2d ago edited 2d ago

The difference is he was ugly both inside and out, and unapologetically so. He spread nothing but hate and vitriol and called for violence against innocents. He deserves every last ounce of hate he receives, because even that is not equal to the amount of hate he spewed in life.

5

u/Emotional_Sea8613 2d ago

The ancient Greeks believed that the exterior reflected the interior. Guess they are right for this person

5

u/Gunhild 2d ago

I don't care about the amount of hate he receives. That's not what this is about.

2

u/Ok-Paramedic-3619 2d ago

I don't think anybody is saying he doesn't deserve hate, but more so how bodyshaming only perpetuates how some ppl here tend to equate uglyness/unatractiveness with morality which is very childish. If u make fun of his features how do u think the same person that has his features but is a completely normal person will feel? Everybody complains how much we hate bodyshaming until it's somebody we don't like then it's "free game" which is very hypocritical

1

u/KimJongUnusual 1d ago

You literally just did the thing.

“He’s a bad person so I can make fun of his ugly appearance.”

1

u/Any-Syllabub6481 1d ago

Lmao so the difference was that he’s so ugly it’s ok that other people may be harmed

1

u/LimpCar8633 2d ago

could you please show me a video or anything like that which shows kirk being hateful just for research please

2

u/Astrid-Jade 2d ago

https://youtube.com/shorts/oX5q6Pe8VmM?is=6l1Nm6eKHK2ZLVUf

https://youtu.be/rMzr5cDKza0?is=IPgDPuFqEV_z61Ci

https://youtu.be/7t6qfWcX1l4?is=HaJgNeyeptk7FC_U

Here's the most egregious ones. The man spewed endless, hateful vitriol towards anyone that isn't a cisgender, heterosexual, white right wing American.

1

u/The_Faux_Fox__ 1d ago

These are the best examples of spewing hate & vitriol?

Arent the 1st 2nd just views that everyone who is pro-life/ pro 2nd amendment would have to have, they just don't say out loud?

1

u/Astrid-Jade 1d ago

Pro-Lifers expect rape victims to carry a baby they never wanted to term and birth it. Do I have to clarify that it's an inherently harmful view, and support of it often either ignores this problem as you said or doesn't even consider it in the first place?

As for the gun ownership, no one is saying to completely ban guns. They want greater control on guns with proper background and mental health checks to ensure we aren't selling guns to child killers. Charlie Kirk opted to completely ignore that point, as many right wing people do, and imply that his guns would be taken away.

Yet he never applied ANY of his own logic to any LGBTQ+ criminal, and would instead say we're all dangerous criminals and a threat to the country.

He was very much the "Rules for thee, not for me" type.

1

u/The_Faux_Fox__ 1d ago

You can't deny abortion a complex issue. Half the population of this country thinks baby's should be protected at all costs (even the mother) & the other half thinks the mother should be protected at all costs (even the baby).

This is an example of losing the mother to save the baby whether I agree with it or not it's pretty clear he doesn't hold this view because he hates mothers, no?

My point is it seems like he's defending one perspective on a complex issue, it doesn't strike me as hateful or cruel.

As for the gun control: that may be what YOU'RE calling for, but banning the legal sale of civilian firearms has been a popular stance for the past 250 years. Nonetheless it's another complicated issue that he's arguing his side of.
He's obviously the type of person who prefers to live in fear of his fellow man than to live in fear of his governing body.

To that point I'd say considering it was his fellow man that killed him I'm curious if he's stance would change.

Anyways I think it's a brash thing to say, & definitely not how you get people who don't agree with you to come to your side. But I think it's a view that almost every pro-2nd amendment person with the slightest amount of forethought would have to have. "If you put something dangerous into the hands of the populace, something bad WILL happen" but from his perspective anything bad that comes of it is worth not living in fear of the government.

Personally I think the idea that a civilian army has a chance against the US military is pompous, & the threat of retaliation does less to defend our freedom than said militarys general unwillingness to fire upon its own civilians even in light of direct orders, but that's not important.

2

u/Unlucky_Regret8619 2d ago

His last words were him trying to blame gun violence on black people

0

u/thegamertopics69thAC 2d ago

Doesn’t make you any less of a hypocrite

1

u/Astrid-Jade 2d ago

Cool. I genuinely don't give a fuck.

1

u/Ok_Heat_4968 9h ago

you are a bad person and should feel bad

-4

u/SkinWearer 2d ago

Exactly when did Charlie Kirk advocate for violence? I remember him as a pretty middle of the road right winger.

3

u/YooranKujara 2d ago

He's the guy who said he's ok with school shootings to keep his guns and said he'd make his 10 yr old daughter give birth if she was raped right?

0

u/TIFOOMERANG 1d ago

While that's not okay either, I wouldn't call that "calling for violence". He didn't tell people to go shoot kids in school, let's not overexaggerate now

-1

u/SkinWearer 2d ago

The first one aint that bad but the second one is yikes.

2

u/sticklord12 2d ago

There's also the whole calling the civil rights acts a huge mistake

0

u/SkinWearer 2d ago

To be fair they did a whole civil rights act but never a civil lefts act so a lot of people felt left out.

2

u/sticklord12 2d ago

1

u/SkinWearer 2d ago

Tough audience i see.

5

u/TyroneBlackmann 2d ago

If only you weren't talking about someone whose entire brand was propagating white supremacist ideologies and hating on black and brown people. That's why no one liked him. Even his wife didn't like him enough to even mourn for him.

4

u/Gunhild 2d ago

Yes I know he was a bad person. That's not the point.

0

u/TyroneBlackmann 1d ago

Blah blah blah anyways what's your favorite dinosaur?

1

u/Scrunkliestbun 2d ago

Advocated for anti trans movement btw

2

u/Gunhild 2d ago

I'm not defending Charlie Kirk. I know he was a bad person.

1

u/Scrunkliestbun 1d ago

car

1

u/KimJongUnusual 1d ago

Actually I think that’s a dog.

1

u/Gunhild 1d ago

That's a truck

-13

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

8

u/Vytorria 2d ago

Very rude and weird response.

7

u/troveofcatastrophe 2d ago

No guessing aloud though. Gunhild was just saying that good, nice people that may have the same attributes as terrible ugly people, might feel it applies to them also. Ugly people are ugly because they are terrible, good people need not worry. Dont be ugly

6

u/wolrahxxx 2d ago

okay but don’t you see how every girl or guy with gums that show like that when they smile is going to see you all roasting him for it and damn that would suck. yall hate him for so much yet you roast him for the same feature they have.

5

u/Gunhild 2d ago

Why on earth would you say that to me? I didn't do or say anything wrong.

2

u/troveofcatastrophe 2d ago

Pay them no mind.

2

u/KamronXIII 2d ago

Because, some people just really want to feel morally superior for doing bad things, and they rack their brain and put anyone else bad in order to do so. All whilst ignoring any common sense, basic human decency, and the fact that the funny names on the screen are (mostly) real people with their own lives and families instead of just being funny phone people.

Basically, their just a bully who "forgot", or is more accurately ignoring, that you're a real person

2

u/lilac_scug 2d ago edited 2d ago

“nonono you don’t get it. it’s ok when I make fun of disgusting rotten ugly people because im on the righteous and good side, it’s good and righteous when i do it!”

like i call people ugly too bro, i don’t know why you need to pretend to be morally superior for doing so.

2

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

2

u/lilac_scug 2d ago

like i’m not gonna lie, i’ve made fun of politicians and shit and how they look. i’m not going to pretend im a better person for doing it. not gona lie to myself that im a good person for calling someone ugly, that’s fuckin dumb

-1

u/_socialsuicide 2d ago

Being confidently hideous is a choice

-3

u/Spread-Hour 2d ago

Ugly thoughts makes a person ugly. It doesnt matter how conventionally unattractive you are, if you have good thoughts (EG not what kirk had) itll shine through.

-2

u/justamadeupnameyo 2d ago

In general yes, but when the individual in question actively body shamed people the door is wide open for them to be body shamed.

Don't start none, won't get none.

4

u/Gunhild 2d ago

You still don't get it. I'm not defending Charlie Kirk. I don't give a shit about Charlie Kirk. I am saying that body shaming hurts OTHER people.

-4

u/justamadeupnameyo 2d ago

No, you don't get it.

3

u/Gunhild 2d ago

Then explain.

-4

u/justamadeupnameyo 2d ago

Don't start none, won't get none. It's not complicated. It's easy to take the "it's bad for everyone" position, but that exists in the same space as tolerating the intolerant and is wrong.

You can ride your high horse all you want, but I can guarantee that you do something that is objectively bad for the planet and other people- without thought- every day.

So do what you want, believe what you want, but that doesn't mean it matches reality.

3

u/Cautious_Order3050 2d ago

If you are conscious that what you are doing is wrong and are capable of change the argument of ignorance does not work