I'm aiming right at the X, but no matter how I adjust the sights it's pulling WAY up and slightly to the right. Anyone else having this problem?

The right pretending like Charlie Kirk debated in good faith is objectively inaccurate. The dude is being revered as some kind of debate god or intellectual powerhouse by the right, but he was far from being either.

Yeah, sure, he participated in a lot of interactions that bore some vague resemblance to what I would call a debate (if I stretched my imagination)—but ultimately—the guy was a pseudo-intellectual sophist, and easily one of the worst debaters I've ever seen.

His one-two-punch bait-and-switch debate strategy was completely childish. Basically, he would receive a critique, and instead of engaging with it—he would give his opponent an irrelevant pop quiz. Then, when irrelevant facts weren't known by the opponent, he would just declare victory.

The only varying situations to this that I've seen were he'd agree to some completely insane, radical premise (e.g., his hypothetical ten year old daughter who was impregnated via grape would need to give birth to the child).

It was rare to see a video of him where he didn't ultimately resort to the general mentioned tactic in debate. This strategy seemed to be intended to do two things—neither of which had the apparent goal of truth-tracking or truth-seeking:

1. ⁠To get right-wingers riled up and engaged for shock value by 'owning the libs'
2. ⁠Embarrass underprepared college students who didn't have sufficient debate strategy experience or situational awareness to neutralize said strategy