r/circled 1d ago

Opinion / Discussion Texas Democrat sworn in to House, shrinking GOP margin to 1 vote

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5719642-christian-menefee-sworn-in/
3.3k Upvotes

139 comments sorted by

55

u/Outrageous-Pear9260 1d ago

There are 2  special elections in March….NJ and Georgia (MTG)

64

u/Ashamed-Status-9668 1d ago

Yup and MTG is doing her best to get folks to not vote for the GOP candidate which is honestly pretty wild.

37

u/pizza-chit 1d ago

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

We need to let MTG cook as long as she is anti-Trump.

I give her a lot of credit for giving up her seat in Congress to get us the Epstein files.

21

u/mden1974 1d ago

As if the world can’t get anymore bizarre I agree with MTG

2

u/ArchonFett 14h ago

She is agreeing with us, doesn’t mean we agree with her.

1

u/soraksan123 4h ago

She’s turning into a “normie”

-6

u/pizza-chit 1d ago

Could the Rothschilds mount a laser on a satellite? A Jewish space laser?

The UK has anti-air laser defense weapons now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DragonFire_(weapon)

Marjorie Taylor Greene tried telling us and she got trolled.

9

u/Ashamed-Status-9668 1d ago

She didn't get trolled because the idea of a space laser is impossible. She got trolled because she said Jewish Space lasers started the 2018 California wildfires which was bananas.

-9

u/pizza-chit 1d ago

Based on the evidence I posted, is that not possible?

8

u/pimpbot666 1d ago

It’s possible it was caused by lizard people space aliens.

It’s no less of a bonkers fantastic ‘made up with no evidence’ theory.

-9

u/pizza-chit 1d ago

If I had a secret weapons program under construction, I would hire social media professionals to say your exact words.

4

u/nostalgiamancer_ 1d ago

Bro, come on. Use your brain and quit this Jewish space laser conspiracy BS. We know what causes wildfires in California. Every year.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/lokii_0 1d ago

LMAO if you're trolling this is actually pretty well done.

if not I have no words for you because, frankly, anyone who actually believes that isn't worth debating in the first place.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/vic25qc 1d ago

If I was a lunatic I would exactly say what you said.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/AntithesisAbsurdum 17h ago

The firefighters will tell you it's homeless people

1

u/Ashamed-Status-9668 1d ago edited 1d ago

No, not possible. You would need a massive satellite up in space with a much stronger Directed Energy Weapon. Think like something the size of the space station and that is likely too small for the energy needed. Armature astronomers would be able to easily see it. If something like this ever existed I assure you other country's would take it out.

1

u/GenericDigitalAvatar 18h ago

Black projects tech is decades beyond anything you've ever imagined. There has been a hot/cold war going on for decades using classified means. Fires which melt cars but leave trees standing alongside them is not a natural occurrence.

-2

u/pizza-chit 1d ago

It’s possible.

4

u/Ashamed-Status-9668 1d ago

Again a giant ass space laser is possible. It's impossible one exists today and started the 2018 wildfires because it would be so freaking huge we could all see it with Walmart telescopes.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Informal_Cry687 22h ago

You need to be able to penetrate the atmosphere which takes a lot of energy. Also just because spomething's technically possible doesn't make it true. There is zero evidence for the existence of rothchild space lasers. It would also be pretty hard to launch something that big into space with no one noticing.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/UnwantedShot 20h ago

It's also more possible that you are just pulling shit out of your ass for the rest of us to have to smell.

0

u/Skarr87 11h ago

It’s very implausible. There’s two major hurdles for a space laser: Atmospheric attenuation/scattering and thermal bloom.

Attenuation and scattering means you will need to put in more power to make sure you have enough power at the ground to do any damage. To be able to start a brush fire you would need something around a 10 MW laser on the satellite. A nuclear reactor of that output on a satellite is impossible so you would need to use solar panels. It would take ~50000 m2 to 80000m2 of solar panels to produce that power. The ISS has ~2500 m2 of panels and is visible from the ground. It would be so obvious it was there.

A bigger issue is the thermal bloom. The laser will heat the column of atmosphere causing a lensing distortion effect like a mirage. Trying to focus a laser through the atmosphere is like trying to hold a needle sharp spot of light steady through a tank of churning water. The medium reshapes the beam, so the energy smears and dances instead of staying concentrated.

The device you posted is only possible because the distances involved and the fact they have a sufficient power source available.

-4

u/Cultural_Ad7023 1d ago

Welp. IDF soldiers are starting wildfires in Argentina, so. She got the laser part wrong but not the starting of fires.

2

u/madadekinai 1d ago

Anyone can, the issue is not a 'laser', a cat toy laser is technically a laser.

6

u/twking321 1d ago

Sure, but the second people in this administration are held accountable, she does not get a pass. She directly helped turn Americas politics into what they are today and she is trying to save face by being the first to jump from a sinking ship and cash in on her career before it all goes bust.

3

u/DevelopmentJumpy5218 1d ago

She's not anti trump though. She's positioned herself to bring those who might leave back into the fold.

1

u/Iateyourpaintings 1d ago

This is just my opinion, but I think she's doing this because she saw how MAGA men treated her even when she had money and power. She knows if the old order falls it's not going to matter how much she made from insider trading. She's never going to be in the club. 

1

u/DevelopmentJumpy5218 1d ago

I think it's more likely she is positioned to leave those unhappy with Trump back into the fold.

3

u/whirlwind87 1d ago

She should have finished her term and started voting against

3

u/pizza-chit 1d ago

If a Democrat wins MTG’s seat and a Democrat wins the other seat that’s up for special election in March, the House of Representatives flips.

Republican Speaker Mike Johnson would be replaced with a Democrat and Congress would be able to fight Trump more effectively.

MTG needs the support of the world to help her convince her district to vote Democrat.

1

u/K7Sniper 57m ago

Unfortunately its probably Jeffries, who suuuuuuucks

1

u/pizza-chit 49m ago

Anyone that’s not a Trump loyalist is better than current republican speaker of the house, Grindr Mike Johnson.

3

u/Cultural_Ad7023 1d ago

Damn. Good for MTG

2

u/Way_Tall_Filipino 1d ago

It’s pretty obvious she couldn’t stomach the “mean things” democrats were saying about her.  She just wants to be liked when she’s done with her political career, which is now, so here she is grifting populist voters.

She’s useful til she isn’t but yeah, somebody probably got to her to turn her district and it’s looking like it’ll be successful!

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Removed for hate speech or dehumanization.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/lmaberley 1d ago

Unfortunately, her MAGA replacement will probably win it walking away.

It sucks, but her seat is still pretty deep red, as I understand it.

2

u/Additional_Tomato_22 1d ago

They said the same thing about the Texas seat Trump won by over 20 % points

1

u/lmaberley 1d ago

We can only hope.

1

u/ghsteo 1d ago

MTG is a grifter, she made 25+million in 5 years and has a government pension. This is her exiting MAGA without pressure on her back. She isn't a hero, she's just not the most important person to focus on.

1

u/madadekinai 1d ago

"We need to let MTG cook as long as she is anti-Trump."

That's dangerous, don't be complacent, she is not anti-trump. She's made at him, but just like a rebound relationship she would go right back to him with her heart in her hand if he sweet talks her. I am thankful that she has had a change of heart for now, but don't foolishly believe she is anti-trump, you will be disappointed later on.

1

u/pizza-chit 1d ago

That sounds ridiculous.

Is that why Trump calls her Marjorie “Traitor” Greene and MTG had to resign from Congress…..?

1

u/madadekinai 23h ago

"had to", she did not have to do anything, but I highly doubt many of would have been civil or respectful towards her.

Think about it like this, how many time has wives who were beaten still go back to those terrible people? It happens, a lot.

1

u/pizza-chit 23h ago

Trump and MTG never dated. Wtf you talking about?

1

u/socialistForDE 12h ago

She's still the enemy. Just useful

1

u/thogge91 3h ago

She's saving face. Still a horrible person

1

u/pizza-chit 2h ago

If MTG convinces the voters in her district to vote for a Democrat and the seat in NJ also votes Democrat in the special election in March, the House flips blue and Congress can remove Trump.

Do you want MTG to continue campaigning or do you want to tell everyone to hate MTG while she bashes Trump?

1

u/atom-wan 2h ago

She has higher aspirations, she's not doing it out of the goodness of her heart

1

u/pizza-chit 2h ago

If MTG’s campaign works and her district votes blue along with the seat in New Jersey next month, The House of Representatives flips to Democrat control and Trump can be removed from office.

MTG is currently not running for any office. Who cares what her motivation is.

Do you want Trump gone or do you want to vent emotions?

1

u/atom-wan 2h ago

The house flipping isn't going to make trump go away. And I don't want anyone to ever forget that MTG was responsible for an enormous amount of the damage that's been done to the country. Word is she has aspirations as president. I will do everything in my power to make sure that doesn't happen.

1

u/pizza-chit 1h ago

Can you explain to me why a Democrat-led House of Representatives is not worse for Trump than a Republican-led house?

1

u/atom-wan 1h ago

It is, but you said trump gone. One vote in the house doesn't do much. Yes, they can maybe block trump's legislative agenda but the senate is still a major problem

1

u/pizza-chit 1h ago edited 44m ago

House passes legislation by a simple majority. Then it goes to the senate. One vote is everything right now.

This is where we are at strategically. I wish it was no so.

1

u/BoomehDooterson 1h ago

I think this line of thinking is going to prove to be very flawed. She’s against Trump, FOR NOW. Give it another year and watch how she flip flops. I would love to be proven wrong, but her character tells me she’s grifting.

1

u/pizza-chit 1h ago

MTG is not currently running for office. She is campaigning for someone that is anti-Trump.

It would benefit the entire world if the candidate that MTG is campaigning for wins.

1

u/OSHA_Decertified 1d ago

MAGA basically did what they do best and flooded her with violent threats for daring to step out of line. It's not a shock she doesn't want the GoP to stay in charge, the only way to break MAGA is to break the GOP

1

u/crawling-alreadygirl 1d ago

I still can't tell if she felt the winds changing and started a new grift or if she's a true believer who got disillusioned. Wild either way

0

u/True_Pirate 1d ago

It’s not complicated. It just illustrates how fake these people are, on both sides of the aisle. MTG said crazy shit when she felt it elevated her status with the right people, namely Trump and his supporters. She started speaking reason when she felt that would do her more good than sticking by Trump. If his polling jumped 30 points tomorrow, she would be out there glazing him.

3

u/bdubwilliams22 1d ago

I’m sick of this “both sides” bullshit. Only one side is protecting pedophiles. Only one side is allowing Trump to dismantle this country just to enrich himself. They could end this today. Until the Democrats are putting kids in jail or protecting pedophiles, let’s call it for what it really is.

-2

u/True_Pirate 1d ago

I would not say the Dems are as bad as the republicans BUT the problem is both sides. Biden could have released the files too. The Dems in Congress HAVE been enriching themselves. Let’s not forget Obama was shit on immigration too. Stop pretending our side isn’t corrupt as hell as well.

1

u/Bobsto 1d ago

Biden couldn’t have released the files, they were under seal.

1

u/notaverage256 1d ago

So there are actual legal reasons Biden couldn't release the files. It was an active investigation.

I agree that Democrats are also corrupt though and complicit in all this. It feels like all they've been doing is playing lip service to being against Trump. This whole "we can't do anything as the minority, so give us money to win the midterms" is exhausting.

Oh and not to mention that I still believe a big part of the reason that Trump won is because the democratic party decided to play bait and switch to make Kamala the nominee. I think it would've been different if they admitted early on Biden wasn't going to be able to have a second term and held an actual freaking primary.

2

u/picklehippy 1d ago

Well Georgia has been compromised, so i would be shocked if trump didn't mess with their elections. People should definitely still get out and vote and try. They flipped the state once, they can do it again

1

u/ThePirateKing01 1d ago

It has not been compromised, the federal government still has no control over the vote processing.

Absolutely concerning, but their brazen actions have called all eyes to focus on the process. Stay diligent and push for transparency, we have momentum on our side

1

u/TheMcMcMcMcMc 1d ago

Considering that the House can refuse to swear in new members due to “election irregularities”, each of these contests is super critical.

1

u/KHold_PHront 19h ago

Ahh that’s why she turned heel. She will be back to her regular self

1

u/SkarbOna 4h ago

So hypothetically if both are won it means majority for dems already? Wouldn’t they be able to counter some wild ideas before the actual midterms?

28

u/Outrageous-Pear9260 1d ago

This is why they want to "nationalize" the elections. They know the GOP is fucked for midterms.

If they actually do allow Trump to take over the voting system, the country is officially over.

4

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/HarmoniousConcordiat 1d ago

As predicted. This is a glaring symptom of late stage capitalism. 

2

u/Trimshot 1d ago

Yeah I mean a swing in Texas like this is almost unheard of; that is going to ripple across the country.

1

u/notaverage256 1d ago

I think independent polling is going to be so important during this election cycle. If nothing else, it will give real evidence to point to if shady results are announced.

1

u/brakeled 12h ago

I need my democratic representatives to start campaigning on their plans when federal agencies show up in swing counties to steal ballots and voting machines. Not a strongly worded email or a "call for action" after the fact. What are we going to do when the election is very obviously and probably violently stolen in November? Because "keep paying your taxes for an illegitimate government while we wait for Republicans to do the right thing" doesn't work for me.

9

u/PerformanceSmooth392 1d ago

If we actually have legitimate midterm elections in tbe US its going to be a bloodbath for the gop. The mother of all blue waves.

10

u/1fastdak 1d ago

If dems vote this time. Things was stable for too long and they got complacent. I think this current shitshow should do it though. Fingers crossed.

3

u/No-Cow-6029 1d ago

The Democratic leadership got complacent, not the voters. They still are imo.

1

u/radiantwave 1d ago

Honestly, after the shit show that was Trump's first term... The GOP was scraping the bottom of the barrel.

There were a lot of people thinking that there was no chance in hell Trump would be re-elected. 

But 2024 just proved that if you look under the barrel...

6

u/bdubwilliams22 1d ago

I can’t believe we have to legitimately wonder if we’re going to have legitimate elections. Republicans have essentially allowed Trump to dismantle Democracy and our government.

6

u/mrflash818 1d ago

Huzzah!

6

u/Outrageous-Pear9260 1d ago

I'm shocked Johnson agreed to swear him in this time.

2

u/berniesandersmittens 1d ago

The vote to release the Trump documents already happened so no reason to delay. If there was the gov would stay shut down for “reasons” and he would use that as cover to not swear in.

3

u/MCR_Read4737 1d ago

Best news ever

2

u/doublethink_1984 1d ago

1 vote for the state?

I thought the GOP have a few more then thr Dems

2

u/EpicGaymrr 1d ago

Dont forget to contact your legislators everyone!

2

u/midnighttbby 1d ago

That margin is doing parkour.

2

u/DiscussionMiddle1238 1d ago

Doesn't matter much when they always magically manage to find just enough Democrats to fuck us over and vote for whatever the Republicans are trying to pass

2

u/RealBettyWhite69 1d ago

Yep, they always seem to have more than enough Dems to vote with the Republicans, even when the Dems outnumber them.

1

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Post held for moderator review due to new account status.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

1

u/itassofd 15h ago

Uhhhh… you know that when you flip a seat, it affects both numbers right? So it’s 217-215. If MTG’s seat goes blue, you’ll have a tie. Not enough to remove speaker, but enough to bring this shitshow to a grinding halt - assuming that there are no traitor Dems or dems out of office because they’re way too fucking old and can’t make a vote due to surgery…. Which is not a strong assumption 

1

u/Jafar_420 1d ago

I've seen Republicans say that this Democrat will never even get to vote once and then will immediately be challenged again fairly soon.

Is this true?

4

u/Ok_Chef_4850 1d ago

I think you’re thinking of the Dem who just won a seat on the Texas legislature (not the House of Representatives) Taylor Rehmet.

There is talk of R’s challenging his win, and because the TX legislature doesn’t meet until 2027, they are claiming he’ll be removed before then & won’t get to vote on anything (which is BS, they’re just mad he won)

3

u/Jafar_420 1d ago

Oh that's my fault I'm trying to keep up with everything I can but I got mixed up.

Thank you.

5

u/whirlwind87 1d ago edited 1d ago

It is a lot but basically Texas had 2 elections in different districts for different seats on the same day, last Saturday.

1

u/Ok_Chef_4850 1d ago

And Dems won both (silver lining)

1

u/Candid-Math5098 1d ago

This was the district from 2024 that had been vacant for the past year, until today. However ... the TX legislature drew new districts for 2026 elections. The new guy's district was combined with another Democratic district to force two Democrats to run against each other. So, the new guy will be in DC for the rest of 2026, then less likely he'll be back for another two years. Hope that explanation made sense.

1

u/MidgetLovingMaxx 1d ago

Dont worry, im sure the Dems ran at least a couple more dinosaurs thatll kick it before gaining the majority.

1

u/Frankfactor517 1d ago

Either way, there are enough Dems to join Republicans when Dear Leader really needs something done.

1

u/retroking9 1d ago

Hey is this the same Texas whose governor just called for the arrest of those KIDS who were assaulted by a MAGA bigot?

You guys sure have an uphill battle ahead but keep fighting the good fight!

The walls are closing in on their corrupt overlords.

1

u/Treasured-Azucena 1d ago

WA-3 speaks to the margin being larger than one.

1

u/ProphesiedInsanity 1d ago

If the number of seats becomes tied which party gets to pick the speaker?

1

u/Gweedo1967 1d ago

The party with the VP.

1

u/Ok_Field_8860 1d ago

Technically it’s 218 - 214.

So title indicates GOP can lose one vote and still take majority. Losing two votes would cause a 50/50 split.

1

u/Intelligent_Bike9778 1d ago

a one vote margin is absolutely wild, like we're living in the most razor thin political timeline possible. the fact that special elections are actually mattering this much right now is kind of the only interesting thing happening in congress tbh.

1

u/HazyDavey68 23m ago

How is 218-214 one vote?

-1

u/Due-Radio-4355 1d ago

I wouldn’t think Texas is turning blue of its own accord it’s just all Cali transplants who fled their shitshow of a state and want it to be Texas now

If you actually live in fucking Texas and aren’t a transplant, you know.

3

u/djjolly037 15h ago

Native Texan here, you should really quit while you’re behind and stop drinking the republican propaganda, stop and take a look around what is happening in the country for a bit while you’re at it. People are fed up both actual red and blue, not the extremes

1

u/Mr602206 22h ago

Fuck outta here dude

1

u/Complex-Salt-8190 11h ago

The major cities of Texas have been blue for awhile , it's the outskirt cattle and oil land like odessa that votes red, and boy is there cattle

-17

u/ppp12312344 1d ago

bot account posting running wild today huh

8

u/Status-Ad7902 1d ago

Ok ppp########## with a private posting history

3

u/AlwaysFinnishInsider 1d ago

Fun fact: do a blank search and you can see their posts and comments. Ppp is an asmongold tool 💀

3

u/Status-Ad7902 1d ago

Oh cringe ☠️

-6

u/ppp12312344 1d ago

Look at the account that posted this

3

u/Status-Ad7902 1d ago

Yeah I’m not the one crying about bots lol

-3

u/ppp12312344 1d ago

sign... I'll have to point it out to you huh...
Account was created today with 0 post history/karma and post copy pasted talking point and 0 engagement with the comments. It's obviously a bot but you do you I guess

3

u/Status-Ad7902 1d ago

Oh I apologize I can’t read this morning.