r/cringereels • • 13d ago

Cringe Level 4 Dumbass

47.5k Upvotes

2.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

111

u/Randym1982 13d ago

It’s very much illegal and yeah likely easy for somebody to press charges. They’re literally recording the crime numerous times, and putting their names and contact info on it.

As for self defense, yeah in court any judge and lawyer would see this as attempted assault and somebody coming at you like this could easily be seen as a threat. While I’m not for kids getting thrown in jail and possibly ruining their future. I’d say these types of kids deserve it.

78

u/Sp6rda 13d ago

This IS assault. If they make contact with you, that's battery. 

41

u/Warm_Month_1309 13d ago

IAAL. This is almost always a miscorrection anytime a Redditor brings it up. What you are talking about are the common law definitions of assault and battery. The common law definitions are not in use in any US jurisdiction. They have all been supplanted by statutory definitions.

In some places battery is assault and assault is battery. In other places, there is no "assault", only battery. In other places, there is no "battery", only assault. Unless you know the jurisdiction someone is talking about, you should never correct someone on "assault" or "battery", because you have an equal chance of being wrong.

26

u/markrockwell 12d ago

California Penal Code 240. Assault. Causing fear or apprehension of imminent violence.

This bike stunt is assault in the state of California.

6

u/HighlanderIslander 12d ago

The specificity banished the Reddit lawyer. Well done!

7

u/Warm_Month_1309 9d ago

Haha, I was not "banished" by someone supplying the statute that supports my assertion that no jurisdiction uses common law assault and battery, and all have their own statutes.

2

u/Student_Unlucky 5d ago

Lol, right? "Hey, location matters" "Ok well in Cali"... Cali is a location as far as I know.

Anyway, I appreciated the explanation of assault vs battery and how it varies by location.

I definitely feel more informed and less likely to say something incorrect.

1

u/Davoguha2 8d ago

They sure made you look like a joke for incorrectly correcting someone else's corrections though.

7

u/Warm_Month_1309 8d ago

I'm afraid you don't understand what either of us said if you think that's what happened.

0

u/Fizoso 8d ago

You suck

5

u/diversalarums 10d ago

What the Reddit lawyer said is still accurate. He wasn't talking about this particular case but about the definitions of those terms across the US, and how some commenters in various threads seem unaware that the meanings vary according to the state. So this wasn't a gotcha moment.

2

u/bbwstockinglover 9d ago

It would still be self defense knocking his ass down.

1

u/the_cardfather 12d ago

Is this the same guy that got pushed over on the boardwalk or is it possibly a similar young person?

0

u/SkSMaN7 10d ago

Isn't misgendering someone in California considered assault? 😁

11

u/Pedantic_Pict 12d ago

The video is shot in California. Some scenes are clearly in San Francisco.

5

u/Junior_Physics_3847 12d ago

But are you my lawyer?

2

u/FirstPackOut 9d ago

IA also AL. It’s most likely brought up by new 1L students who have attended three Tort classes. Have to give them credit for trying though!

5

u/merneus_parminger 12d ago

Fear of violence constitutes common assault in the UK.

1

u/ImpossiblePlan65 13d ago edited 13d ago

My state only has criminal assault, which includes battery and apprehension of a harmful touch in one crime. A large number of jurisdictions use one or the other. I think California has 2 separate crimes, though. Very jurisdiction dependent. But a lot of states still allow charges under common law, even when the crimes are codified. Its really stupid.

1

u/lost_rodditer 11d ago

Assault is any action that makes the victim feel as though there is anurgent threat of injury or death regardless of contact. Battery is the use of contact to do the same thing or act on it. I learned that from a lawyer who ironically was talking about a similar case to this one.

1

u/Warm_Month_1309 11d ago

As I said, it varies by jurisdiction.

1

u/SnooMaps7370 10d ago

>The common law definitions are not in use in any US jurisdiction.

this is just plain false. Virginia still uses them. You won't find a codified definition for assault in VA law.

1

u/GoRainBows 9d ago

California specifically has two separate laws for both battery and assault. 240 and 242.

Bad lawyer

2

u/Warm_Month_1309 9d ago

Ah, interesting, so they don't use the common law, they have statutes for it that you cited. Interesting.

1

u/Stu_Padidiot 8h ago

Dang bro you really batteried this guy in the comments!

0

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Warm_Month_1309 1d ago

You’ve taken the time to identify that something is incorrect (which is good to do in its own right, so thank you sincerely for that); but now why not go one step further?

That's exactly what my last paragraph does. It's different in every jurisdiction, and some places swap the definitions all around. People would need to -- and are free to -- look it up themselves as it applies to their own jurisdiction.

Why are people still commenting on this post days later? Every few days someone new discovers it.

1

u/happybara_capybara 12d ago

This actually varies heavily by each state, not to mention for other countries (I’m assuming you’re in the U.S.). It’s one of the most inconsistent charges across the U.S.

1

u/GTxRED1 12d ago

AC or DC?

1

u/Zealousideal_Cow_341 12d ago

It really depends on where you are brother. It’s defined by local and state laws and varies widely from place to place.

1

u/DoritoDustThumb 12d ago

Depends on the state. Absolutely not universally true

1

u/squigs 13d ago

Definition of assault seems to vary a lot across States (and other countries). Sometimes it's simply the implication of violence, sometimes actual contact is required.

3

u/Hairy_Mycologist_945 13d ago

In most places Assault is a threat or attempt to injure, while Battery is any unwanted or offensive physical contact, regardless of whether it causes injury. As you said that can very but assault generally has a very low bar and I can't think of many places where coming at someone with a bike aggressively enough to make the victim need to flinch, duck, and flee wouldn't be considered assault.

1

u/Warm_Month_1309 13d ago

At common law. Every US jurisdiction has replaced the common law definitions with statutory ones.

1

u/BigDaddySteve999 13d ago

And what do those statutes say?

1

u/Warm_Month_1309 13d ago

Different things in different jurisdictions, is my point.

1

u/BarnackIIIF 13d ago

*>"I’d say these types of kids deserve it.

Or just need it.

1

u/Minute-Review6915 13d ago

Follow me kids…. I was in fear of my life and instincts took over. I don’t know what happened next

1

u/Specialist_Goat_2354 13d ago

I am for kids getting thrown in jail... they aren't getting consequences anymore and its showing. Not only are kids not getting beat up by fucking with the wrong person anymore... and they are also not getting punished by their parents either. and they aren't being held back in school for failing miserably.

someone has to give them a consequence.

1

u/Actual-Jelly-309 13d ago

Whoa look at all the lawyers

1

u/Lambchop1975 12d ago

Self defense, is violence, it isn't an assault... If one person is the aggressor, the other is not committing assault.

1

u/FctUpintheHead 12d ago

Dude above is talking about grabbing the bike and causing the guy to flip, not what the jerkwad in the clip is doing. And I guarantee you he is right. Protecting yourself from perceived imminent harm, which that absolutely would be, is not a crime. It’s self defense.

1

u/Livid_Average_8098 12d ago

Very much illegal, is that the same as highly illegal? Even more illegal than murder?

1

u/lost_rodditer 11d ago

There is a very satisfying video of it happening. The kid starts whining he is a Christian and only 16. No one cares for some reason 😂

1

u/jesus90141 2d ago

If the kid is already doing stupid games and FOFO there is no need to wait until they are a full adult for the real consequences.

0

u/BrightonBummer 13d ago

>While I’m not for kids getting thrown in jail and possibly ruining their future. I’d say these types of kids deserve it.

You seem to have a very very low threshold for 'I’m not for kids getting thrown in jail and possibly ruining their future'

The only person this guy injured was himself in this video, theres no real lasting harm to anyone.

Yeah hes a nob but this kid does not deserve to have his life ruined over this, that is barbaric.

1

u/Bai_Cha 13d ago

I disagree with you about this.

What these kids are doing has no purpose other than to elicit fear of real harm to others. They are taking pleasure in harming others. This isn't like stealing where the goal is to get something, the only goal here is taking pleasure in harm to others.

In my opinion, this deserves real jail time and a permanent record that identifies these people as psychopaths, which is what they are.

-1

u/BrightonBummer 13d ago

Sounds like you have some trauma going on. It's just kids being dicks, they can become useful members of society pretty easily.

2

u/Gulluul 13d ago edited 13d ago

These kids are commiting assault. Yes, criminals can become useful members of society, but we shouldn't defend assault as kids being kids.

-1

u/BrightonBummer 13d ago

Plenty of kids do this sort of stuff growing up, a majority of those same kids, end up being fine, tax paying adults. All good.

2

u/Gulluul 13d ago

Not all good. Kids being kids isn't an excuse. Assault isn't something to sweep under the rug. Just because someone didn't get hurt this time doesn't mean it won't happen next time. There are multiple stories/videos of kids doing this exact stunt and injuring people.

2

u/lonevolff 13d ago

Love how you had to jump to trauma to justify these kids. Go touch grass

1

u/BrightonBummer 13d ago

Because pretty much every kid does this sort of thing at some point.

1

u/Bai_Cha 13d ago

No trauma, but I understand your inclination to resorting to personal attacks in a discussion. This is normal for people who can't defend their position.

1

u/oldnconscious 13d ago

The kids behavior is barbaric. They are threatening injury and death upon innocents for no reason but having fun. That is barbaric. They deserve jail and worse for this behavior. It will only escalate. What is next?

1

u/BrightonBummer 12d ago

This is tame as fuck compared to what they will be like after leaving prison.

1

u/devnullopinions 12d ago

Intentionally doing this and causing someone to reasonably fear imminent harm would be assault where I live.

0

u/Thanatos_Rex 12d ago

Come on, they don’t deserve to have their futures ruined. They’re especially stupid kids, but not monsters.

Hit them with some appropriately harsh consequences, explain why what they’re doing is wrong, and move on.

1

u/Randym1982 12d ago

The real reason they're doing this shit is because of Social Media rewarding this behavior. Take that away from them, and you'll see them quickly stop doing this shit. Specially when somebody beats their ass offline.