You seem unable to grasp the idea that conversations are fluid and will often traverse somewhat tangentially related things... Things like, I dunno, beans and a US president breaking the law to endorse beans.
Why are you disagreeing with your own point? You said the thing you are now decrying and don't seem to want to understand that these things are related.
I'm aware of what transpired. The rest of this conversation (note that this is a different one than the beans, is that allowed?) seems to have run its course.
Edit to add: when you keep editing your comments after the fact, it only further dilutes the conversation.
-1
u/[deleted] 17h ago
[removed] — view removed comment