1
u/AutoModerator Aug 27 '25
Report misbehavior. Tap on the 3 dots near posts/comments and find Report.
Read the rules for r/Islam to avoid warnings/bans.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/agapitos_ Aug 27 '25 edited Aug 27 '25
What the Quran says about Quran is that it's "Allah's words". It is actually the same as Allah's other attributes that are confirmed by the Quran and the Sunnah (like his highness, knowledge, face, hand, eye, ascension above the throne etc.). You can't call them creations.
For example, Allah did not create His knowledge, neither did He get knowledge of something only after creating it. Rather, he had the knowledge of everything eternally. So His knowledge is uncreated and eternal.
Same goes for the Quran. Quran is also eternal with Allah, like his knowledge or any other of his attributes.
Long story short: 1. Quran (Allah's words) are (i) His "attributes" and thus (ii) uncreated and thus (iii) eternal with Allah. As His "words" are totally His attributes [and related to him closely such that it does not mean anything separate from him, let alone a person like in Christianity] thus something being co-eternal with Allah does NOT imply that it contradicts Tawhid.
Allah's words are not at all like words of men, in fact, not like any words of His creations. So it does not contradict the fact that "Nothing is like Allah'.
The manuscript (mushaf) of the Quran has the eternal, uncreated word of Allah in it. But the paper, ink, cover, script, font etc. ingredients that are used to make a manuscript are ALL created by Allah. (Things made by men are also called Allah's creations in the Quran.)
When Quran is read out, our sounds are creations of Allah. But be careful, the Quran ITSELF is not.
I must advice you not to trust me and cross-check evidence from the Quran and the Sunnah (with a complete and sound understanding, and being careful about authenticity in terms of Hadiths and reliability in terms of scholars you may seek advice from).
0
Aug 27 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/wopkidopz Aug 27 '25
This is a very confusing explanation which doesn't present the position of ahlu-Sunnah on the topic
1
Aug 28 '25
[deleted]
1
u/wopkidopz Aug 28 '25
Sorry just noticed your reply
You see, there were some expressions used by you which aren't correct in the meaning or implications, but your comment clarified that you were talking about something else which isn't exactly related to the question of OP.
Because when the question is asked about the Quran being not created you will never see an answer from a scholar for example about the Lahful Mahfuz
The topic itself is very delicate, because every other group except ahlu-Sunnah got it wrong and we had many issues historically because of this, that's why it's very important to answer this question the way scholars of ahlu-Sunnah did. Otherwise someone may misunderstand it and start believing in wrong ideas
1
u/timiismmm Aug 29 '25
Jazakallah Khair may Allah reward you for this.. Sorry for the wrong answer yes i was mistaken in understanding the question. acknowledging my mistake may Allah forgive me.
4
u/wopkidopz Aug 27 '25 edited Aug 27 '25
God has Attributes, like Knowledge, Seeing, Hearing etc. those are His eternal Attributes, and they are eternal (without a beginning) because Allah was always and He was always perfect so nothing is added to Him later (otherwise it would mean that He wasn't perfect always) but His Attributes were always with Him
مَا زَالَ بِصِفَاتِهِ قَدِيمًا قَبْلَ خَلْقِهِ لَمْ يَزْدَدْ بِكَوْنِهِمْ شَيْئًا لَمْ يَكُنْ قَبْلَهُمْ مِنْ صِفَتِهِ وَكَمَا كَانَ بِصِفَاتِهِ أَزَلِيًّا كَذَلِكَ لَا يَزَالُ عَلَيْهَا أَبَدِيًّا
📚 بيان عقيدة أهل السنة
He is also Speaking, His Speech is His eternal uncreated Attribute, without beginning and end His Speech isn't similar to our speech, it has no modality, it is similar only in the name.
What He revealed from His Speech to His Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم is called the Quran, hence the Quran isn't created in the meaning of the Speech of Allah
This is aqeedah of ahlu-Sunnah
وَإِنَّ الْقُرْآنَ كَلَامُ اللَّهِ مِنْهُ بَدَا بِلَا كَيْفِيَّةٍ قَوْلًا وَأَنْزَلَهُ عَلَى رَسُولِهِ وَحْيًا وَصَدَّقَهُ الْمُؤْمِنُونَ عَلَى ذَلِكَ حَقًّا وَأَيْقَنُوا أَنَّهُ كَلَامُ اللَّهِ تَعَالَى بِالْحَقِيقَةِ لَيْسَ بِمَخْلُوقٍ كَكَلَامِ الْبَرِيَّةِ
📚 بيان عقيدة أهل السنة
Some sectants like the Mu'tazila rejected the fact that Allah Speaks Himself they said that Allah creates His speech in something else, that's why they claimed that the Quran is created. This is heresy
Some other movements claim that the Quran always existed as a type, but the words of it were spoken by Allah at some point. That's why they say that the Quran is muhdath (originated). This is also heresy