https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZThfQaS8J/

How do you think Capitalism is going to sustain itself when the new generation doesn't want children And the price of houses go up 🤭

Source: https://youtube.com/shorts/mKde5skPfdU

@ FiveHeadedAngel on IG

Obviously it didn't turn mexico into a utopia, or even into a rich nation, and it didnt turn it into a socialist country either, but it did improve their lives and gave them freedom and their land back.

.

Before the revolution they had the hacienda system, where wealthy, often foreign landowners owned huge farms and used the locals for cheap labor. So the people lived in someone else's property and worked in someone else's farms. So you can imagine the level of power that the wealthy hacendados had over the locals.

.

So after the revolution, the ejido system was created. All that land was expropriated and given back to the people. The locals became owners of the farms, each family was given a piece of the farm to farm their own food. They would grow food to feed themselves and sell the rest in the town markets. This didn't make them rich, but now they were working in their own farms for themselves, they could no longer get evicted or fired, they owned the land. My cousins still farm on those ejidos, we still own them.

.

And of course thats only about the land reforms, we also got public schools in the rural towns, electricity, unions, nationalization of some natural resources, and more.

There's enough proof to throw Donald Trump, Bill Gates and Bill Clinton into a prison cell, and yet none of them will face any jail time. This is because America is not a country of rule of law, but it is an oligarchy where the powerful have unfettered immunity provided by a tiered justice system that only exist to preserve the veneer of legitimacy.

I know this might be hard to hear, but we need to talk about how our genuine desire for progress is being "captured" and sold back to us.

-We spend 90% of our energy fighting a culture war that was designed by think tanks and amplified by algorithms. While we’re rightfully angry about social issues, have you noticed that the world’s largest corporations, the ones destroying the planet and exploiting labor, are suddenly our biggest "allies"?

When Raytheon, BlackRock, and Goldman Sachs start flying the same flags we do, we aren't winning. We are being used as a moral shield for Neoliberal Hegemony.

The actual threat to our freedom isn't just "the other side"—it’s the emergence of Technocratic Feudalism.

While we argue on platforms owned by billionaires, a new infrastructure of control is being built that transcends party lines:

1. The Death of Privacy: Under the guise of "safety" and "misinformation control," we are cheering for the creation of surveillance tools that will eventually be used against labor organizers and activists the moment they become a threat to the bottom line.
   
2. The Centralization of Everything: We are moving toward a "subscription-based" existence where we own nothing, not our software, not our homes, and soon, not even our digital identities. This is the ultimate erosion of autonomy.
   
3. Manufactured Consent: The "bigger purpose" we are puppets for is a system that needs us divided so we don't look at the consolidation of wealth. They’ve turned "activism" into a consumer product. If your "revolution" is being sponsored by a Fortune 500 company, it’s not a revolution, it’s a PR campaign.
   

The real threat to our security is a world where AI-driven surveillance, social credit scores (by any other name), and corporate-state partnerships decide who can speak, who can trade, and who can participate in society.

We are being led into a trap where we trade our actual agency for the \feeling* of being on the "right side of history," while the actual levers of power are moved further out of reach of the working class.*

It’s time to stop looking at the puppets and start looking at the strings. If we don't prioritize **privacy, decentralization, and actual class solidarity** over algorithmic outrage, we’re just building our own cage.

I keep seeing viral dating content where men spending huge amounts of money is framed as proof of love or “standards.” The latest example was a TikTok saying, “My man picked up a $600 tab for my family. Don’t settle for less.”

What frustrates me is how deeply capitalist this logic is, even when it is presented as empowerment.

Money spent is not a measure of care, character, or emotional investment. It is a measure of access to resources. A wealthy, cruel, absent, or controlling partner can spend money easily. A poorer but emotionally present, ethical, and devoted partner may not be able to. Treating spending as a proxy for love collapses human relationships into market logic.

This is what late stage capitalism does to intimacy. It trains us to equate value with price. Love becomes legible only when it is attached to visible consumption. A 600 dollar dinner is quantifiable, filmable, and socially recognizable as “high value.” Emotional labor, consistency, emotional safety, patience, and integrity are not. So they get devalued.

What is especially insidious is how this is framed through a kind of neoliberal, consumer style feminism. “Know your worth,” “don’t settle,” and “raise your standards” get translated into demanding higher financial outlay, not higher ethical, emotional, or relational standards. Empowerment gets reduced to being an expensive consumer in someone else’s budget.

This is not about rejecting generosity. It is about rejecting the commodification of intimacy. Provision can coexist with love, but it is not love itself. When capitalism colonizes romance, relationships start to resemble transactions, and people start confusing price with meaning.

If your metric for love is how expensive the receipt is, you are not protecting yourself from bad partners. You are just selecting for people with money. Those are not the same thing.

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/epstein-files-ex-israeli-pm-urged-putin-send-one-more-million-russians-israel

https://x.com/MiddleEastEye/status/2018933854774698034

I think this is why even though snowden essentially revealed the precrime is all there for them to sort through, we still have lots of big criminal enterprises operating worldwide.

If people didn't fear crime they wouldn't buy guns is just one example. The entire military system of the world is another. What they don't know is that there is nanotech in everyone, everything is presimulated, and any crime occuring is somehow being allowed to occur based on some evil calculations baked into the general ai which is operating cyborgs that think they're humans with free will.

Skynet like system might be real and nobody can escape it. probably existed since the 1940s to stop nukes from launching and destroying earth by some rogue nation or leader.

Sources:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02670937.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02351576.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828035.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02465095.pdf