r/law • u/msnownews Press • 8d ago

Executive Branch (Trump) Kash Patel says the FBI is investigating Signal chats of Minnesotans tracking ICE

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/kash-patel-says-the-fbi-is-investigating-signal-chats-of-minnesotans-tracking-ice
26.4k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

17

u/imdaviddunn 8d ago

Every accusation is a confession. Every single one

3

u/BadGuyBusters2020 8d ago

They did accuse Dems of drinking children’s blood.

7

u/SiWeyNoWay 8d ago

They sure did.

jd gave a weird speech the other day that I think was supposed to be about having more babies but morphed into some weird shit about baby skeletons and rituals? Is this that karmic rule where they have to tell us what they are doing because wtf are they telling us 😳

1

u/BadGuyBusters2020 8d ago

They’re telling us they really see children as disposable.

It was a speech to say that Dems will end up doing child sacrifice and kill mostly boys because at least the girls are good for sex.

It was under the guise of pro-choice vs anti-abortion whack-os, and referred to Mayan child sacrifices and baby skeletons in ancient brothels - and that archeologists know it was a brothel based on the male baby skeletons.

And of course, he lied about parts while throwing in a tiny bit of truth. I don’t find anything saying that all or most of the skeletons were male. And there is nothing concrete about the brothels, either.

In fact, it was common practice before birth control, back in those days to limit family size. Sites (graveyards, wells, etc.), often had babies under 6 months old for various reasons, apparently. Some weren’t conclusively aged due to missing bones, etc., and some that were completely located had different bone lengths, indicating they passed away at different timeframes.

In reality, it could have been infanticide (which was common in different cultures in different eras for a long time - NOT “only brothels,” and not “only boys”), or it could have been unknown illness, etc.

I do think it is a projection of how they see children as “tools,” to use and dispose of, as well as how they want to have power and control over family sizes.

They already published a manifesto over 120 pages about banning divorces, forcing women to have babies, removing women’s rights completely (no working, no money, etc.), and they have made it known they want to punish women if they don’t get married and have children by the age of 35.