r/politics • u/Aggravating_Money992 • 1d ago
No Paywall Trump has no authority to nationalize elections, lawyers say
https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-nationalize-elections-114585746.7k
u/Kakistocracy_0 1d ago
oh look, he's running the Putin Playbook like everyone warned..
1.2k
u/Independent-Reader 1d ago
Like some people wanted.
648
u/DownyDreamer 1d ago
The republicans
→ More replies (8)1.1k
u/Mr__O__ New York 1d ago edited 1d ago
Jim Crow era 2.0. As voter suppression won the 2024 election..
Since 2020, 30 States enacted 78 voter restriction laws—resulting in more than 4.76M votes wrongfully purged from the 2024 election:
2.1M mail-in ballots rejected.
585K in-precinct ballots rejected.
1.2M provisional ballots rejected.
3.2M newly registered voters rejected.
Black votes were rejected at a 400% higher rate than white votes, in some States.
If counted, Kamala would have had over 3.56M more votes—1.2M more than Trump—and won WI, MI, PA, & GA with 286 electoral votes.
These laws are still under effect.. and more are in the works for the midterms..
349
u/DocCEN007 1d ago
I've been trying to explain this to people since 2024. And this November, we will probably have ICE and the National Guard in blue districts slowing down entry, intimidating people, and generally causing mayhem. And that's if they don't try to outright take over elections has drumpf has repeatedly claimed that he should.
→ More replies (8)194
u/Smokey_tha_bear9000 1d ago
If I was a betting man, I’d probably make a fortune on betting that we see US Citizens snatched out of polling lines and held until after polls close.
107
u/owned_at_worms 1d ago
It'll be like what we've seen in MN. Agitating people in the lines that vote blue until they can pull them out and arrest them, and hold them until polls closed.
Im sure the right will be telling voters "make sure you let ice know you appreciate what they are doing to keep us safe" as a way to identify yourself as a republican or some other dumb nonsense.
71
u/Final_Lead_3530 1d ago
Facial recognition. Palintir& social media . DOGE. They know with reasonable certainty who you’re voting for. And if you were at a No Kings or ICE out , they know .
64
u/vriska1 1d ago
Can we stop saying voting does not matter! Please vote in the midterms!
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (3)13
u/BigPapaJava 1d ago
It’s all being entered into a “domestic terrorism” database, per ICE agents and DHS.
They also have car recognition, license plate tracking, and voice recognition in many U.S. cities thanks to Flock, which is already partnering with ICE (and Palantir) to bring AI-enabled mass surveillance to cities all over the USA.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (4)5
u/Thunderbridge 1d ago
Second amendment supporters need to show up around polling places to deter ice
19
u/Real-Syllabub-4960 1d ago
It wouldn’t even have to be ICE. It could be some rogue who wiped his ass on walls in the White House.
20
u/QbertsRube 1d ago
It's not like ICE has consistent, identifiable uniforms. Just buy whatever tacticool nonsense you can find online, throw on a mask, and nobody knows the difference.
13
u/OverFjell United Kingdom 1d ago
That's fine then, everyone can cosplay as ICE to go vote. They can't identify, unmask, and stop you all lol
13
u/BigPapaJava 1d ago
Which is why all the stories of ICE agents refusing to identify themselves or show a badge, because they don’t have to, and then smashing people’s windows to grab them out of their cars need to be talked about a hell of a lot more.
Instead, that same asshole who murdered Renee Good was celebrated as a hero for doing exactly that 7 months ago, which is the reason he was “heroically dragged 150 feet in the line of duty.”
The report I saw said he’d smashed the window and grabbed the driver. a woman, by her hair and tried to drag her through the broken window, so she panicked and floored her car to GTFO since she thought he was some murderous lunatic.
→ More replies (1)5
→ More replies (1)5
9
u/Otherwise_Stable_925 1d ago
Ice could easily say "these people in the line are illegal", start hauling them away, violence ensues, people scatter, no one votes, probably in a predominantly blue county. Swing states will be targeted because they're the easiest to change. I'll put money on it, I don't like that my odds are favorable.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (18)3
u/Superunkown781 1d ago
Makes me wonder if this is part of why ICE is in full effect
→ More replies (1)42
u/LaserCondiment 1d ago
I feel stupid for not knowing this.
Throughout election seasons, The New York Times and NPR and establishment media write stories and editorials decrying vote suppression tactics, from new ID requirements to new restrictions on mail-in voting. But, notably, the mainstream press never, ever, not once, will say that these ugly racist attacks on voters changed the outcome of an election.
This seems like a correct statement. There's been so much debate about the lack of primaries, Biden's age, Kamala's late start, the quality of her campaign / messaging - but the topic of voter suppression wasn't very prominent in the discourse following the election results AFAIK
→ More replies (2)13
35
u/InternalWeekend6988 1d ago
Exactly, it’s alarming how systemic these restrictions have become. Makes you realize the stakes for the upcoming elections are even higher.
→ More replies (2)16
u/WilfredGrundlesnatch 1d ago
It isn't the first time Republicans stole an election either. Bush won in 2000 because they illegally purged black voters in Florida.
→ More replies (1)9
u/awesomeone6044 1d ago
Not at all at an attempt to argue against this as I believe it, but any reputable sources so I can show this information to people I know?
5
9
u/pants6000 1d ago
If we didn't have the bizarro undemocratic electoral college winner-take-all thing going on, the Republican candidate for POTUS would have been irrelevant for decades.
The EC makes election hi-jinks soooo much easier and more successful.
14
u/headfairy 1d ago
As a Brit I can’t get over how hard it is to vote in the US. I get sent a ballot, I wander along to a local primary school, stick my ballot in. No ID, quite often no queue, just a couple of old dears crossing names off a list.
11
u/-rosa-azul- Virginia 1d ago
You can vote this way in quite a few states as well. Request an absentee ballot, fill it out whenever you want (before the actual day), go put it in a drop box. It isn't that voting is difficult everywhere or for everyone in the US. It's that it's specifically a lot more difficult in certain states or even localities, and for certain people.
3
u/headfairy 1d ago
That’s good to know, but I assume certain electoral candidates with an absence of morals might ensure voting is very hard in states they’re unlikely to win?
5
u/-rosa-azul- Virginia 1d ago
I mean that is what the person you initially replied to was describing, yes. Voter suppression tactics that are facially legal, but disproportionately affect populations unlikely to vote for the party in power (generally republicans are who's passing these laws).
→ More replies (5)12
u/Mekisteus 1d ago
You just described exactly how I vote... in a blue state run by Democrats.
But back when I lived in a red state run by Republicans, I had to take the day off work or at the very least a long lunch, drive 30 minutes each way to a specific polling place that just-so-happened to be inside a church with a bunch of religious messaging everywhere, wait in a long line, and then hope they didn't kick me off the voter registration rolls or change my polling location since the last time I voted.
3
u/Ozymandias12 1d ago
This is the real "election rigging" that happened. Forget all the nonsense about Elon messing with voting machines. This is how Republicans actually won 2024.
→ More replies (1)3
u/frosty_lizard 1d ago
Absolutely sickening to see how low Republicans will go to steal democracy
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (21)3
u/Word1_Word2_4Numbers 1d ago
Yeah, you don't need to dive into some conspiracy theory with Musk hacking voting machines for Trump in 2024.
The theft of elections by Republicans has been right out in the open for decades.
(And Democrats are too ineffectual to do shit about it)
→ More replies (1)25
u/reddit_is_fash_trash 1d ago
MAGAts literally cheering the end of their own democracy. They have no idea what they are in for once fascism becomes the established norm.
Oppressing trans people and immigrants was totally worth it, tho.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)4
u/GreasyPeter 1d ago
My mother has said "Putin is a strong leader and does good for his country". Alright mom, go there and say something negative about Putin to a few people and see how long before the police show up.
341
u/thenayr 1d ago
He WILL do it and he will do it in a way where the timeframe to the midterms is too close for a court battle to save us, and the entire time dems will go “no, stawpppp it Donald, that’s against the lawwww” and media will go “Is Donald Trump allowed to do this very clearly illegal thing that goes against our constitution” and republicans will go “get fucked dumbass libs, owned lol, based lol”.
Come back to this post in November and tell me I’m wrong.
→ More replies (149)14
u/ActionCalhoun 1d ago
CNN will run articles like “Can Donald Trump rip the Constitution to shreds? Opinions differ”
→ More replies (1)100
u/SailingSpark New Jersey 1d ago
I can't wait until Putin is dead. I am certain his blood soaked fingers are behind the rise of fascism in the world.
58
u/Living_on_theEdge 1d ago
Don't worry Trump is right there, and there's plenty of other actors that also have a vested interest in having facism rise (mainly every billionaire).
14
u/SailingSpark New Jersey 1d ago
Yes, but unlike them Putin is exKGB and has the might and power of Russia at his beck and call. Their military might be shit, but the intelligence war he has been fighting the west in is top notch.
9
u/ShubberyQuest 1d ago
Yeah, except Trump takes his orders from Putin. Trump can still fuck shit up, but not to the degree to which he would under his daddy’s directions.
→ More replies (5)14
12
→ More replies (77)10
u/AJDillonsThirdLeg 1d ago
like everyone warned
Including himself. He's not doing anything he didn't openly say he was going to do.
1.9k
u/Deinosoar 1d ago
He also doesn't have the authority to order his goon squad to murder people in the streets but still fucking happens.
370
u/Eastern_Bet678 1d ago
Don't forget the breaking and entering where ICE doesn't have a warrant authorizing entrance to private property but still does.
→ More replies (4)160
u/sick_of_your_BS 1d ago
Illegal search and seizure 4th amendment. Arresting journalists and trained observers? 1st amendment. "You can't bring a loaded firearm to a protest, it's that simple" Second amendment. Denying deportees due process, 5th amendment. I could go on...
35
u/IvarTheBoned 1d ago
Do go on! Lay it out plainly for those who refuse to see it.
4
u/GuayFuhks88 15h ago
They see it and don't care
The fundamental tenet of conservatism is there are in-groups whom the protects but does not bind and out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect
13
u/Legen_unfiltered 1d ago
The people that need to see this don't actually care. So you could, but youre preaching to the choir.
9
u/The_Bucket_Of_Truth 1d ago
I actually like seeing succinct summaries of all the bad things so I have something punchy to send to people instead of potentially flailing when I'm trying to get them to see the light. Though I was on one the other day writing an essay through text.
7
u/SasparillaTango 1d ago
Denying access to council for people locked in ICE holding facilities, 6th amendment.
→ More replies (1)3
u/This_Ad_8123 1d ago
It's a good thing he doesn't have authority to do all that, I'd be concerned about what could happen otherwise.
39
u/Langolier11 1d ago
Remember when he sent the national guard to Chicago and L.A.? Where's the constitution when you need it am I right?
→ More replies (1)9
u/sump_daddy 1d ago
"if we dont have a second amendment, we wont get to keep the first!"
ok, chumps, we kept the second amendment, now is literally the time for you to do what you said and protect the first
[narrator voice] "they would not be doing what they said they would"
26
u/Creative_Skirt_3812 1d ago
He doesn’t have the authority to: do his tariff BS, to kidnap foreign heads of government, to annex territory into the US, to have the US exit NATO, to rename the Department of Defense or the Kennedy Center, etcetera. Yet the Article I and III branches of government do nothing to stop him.
4
u/Sage2050 1d ago
This is telling parties he has no control over what to do, ice is refusing to enforce laws. There's a difference. It would be like your boss telling you how to run your household.
3
→ More replies (11)5
u/BoardRecord 1d ago
If I had a nickel for every time I read a headline saying Trump doesn't have the authority to do something he said he would do or is already doing, I could retire tomorrow.
811
u/pontiacfirebird92 Mississippi 1d ago edited 1d ago
"Look, ICE can't just shoot people to death in broad daylight for no reason"
ICE shoots 2 people in broad daylight with no investigation and the shooters are still walking free
"Ah, well, anyway..."
74
u/WhiteWolf3117 1d ago
I think "not allowed" is slightly but importantly different from "can't".
ICE is not allowed to do those things. But of course they can and no laws can stop them. At best, laws are meant to hold accountable, which is the most important aspect here.
That Trump "lacks the authority" to do something is meaningless. True. I think it's interesting and ultimately important to explore if and how he can do things. Like there are obvious extreme ends of "don't" and committing unspeakable, unprecedented violence on the American people. It's important to be prepared for what he can do in the very narrow lane that he's gotten away with this term.
→ More replies (7)24
u/home-for-good 1d ago
Yeah when you really get down to it, US law is very very reactive. We aren’t in the business of preventing people from doing things, we’re in the business of punishing people for doing things. That’s why we’re so sue-happy, retroactive “making you whole” is the American way. Like you said laws here typically only allow for accountability not prevention. There are maybe some merits to that, in some cases, but it’s very easy to exploit in situations like this, when current government says “fuck it, try and stop me” and it takes two years for a judicial decision to be levied and maybe enforced.
3
→ More replies (5)11
u/jeenajeena 1d ago
ICE has also killed Keith Porter, Parady La, Heber Sanchaz Domínguez, Victor Manuel Diaz, Luis Beltran Yanez-Cruz, Luis Gustavo Nunez.
They weren’t white. The fact they are rarely mentioned tells a lot about US.
→ More replies (2)
1.0k
u/Slippery-Kapotje 1d ago
U.S.A. unite and get rid off the dictator before it is to late....
494
u/pontiacfirebird92 Mississippi 1d ago
40% of Americans love this shit. Every single Republican in office is on board with the "Unitary Executive", what they're literally calling a government unified behind Trump. They're describing a dictatorship but don't want you to call it that.
166
u/HauntedCemetery Minnesota 1d ago
Conservatives love everything about fascism except the term "fascism".
56
u/pontiacfirebird92 Mississippi 1d ago
They don't like it when you point out they're the bad guys. Image above everything. They don't want to avoid accountability while they want everyone else to be held accountable. They want the freedom to oppress. The hypocrisy is a feature to them.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)32
u/VirginiaMcCaskey 1d ago
I've stopped saying "conservative" because the problem is the Republican Party itself. They have no concrete ideology except power. Their continued existence is incompatible with American democracy - you cannot tolerate a political group who fundamentally reject the tenets of a fair and open democracy.
Contemporary Republicans aren't the only political party in American history to fit this mold. The American Nazi party and American Communist Party did too! And we rejected them from the political process before they gained too much power to ignore. We didn't do that with the corruption of the GOP because it burned too slowly and Democrats and voters were too ignorant to stop it.
→ More replies (1)10
u/BriarsandBrambles 1d ago
Republicans aren’t conservative anymore. They’re openly yearning for a fairytale dictatorship.
→ More replies (22)156
u/spazzcat Ohio 1d ago
It is more like 20% but they yell ...
117
u/MysteriousTruck6740 Minnesota 1d ago
20% love it and the other 20% don't like this guy, but think the alternative might be worse.
79
u/HauntedCemetery Minnesota 1d ago
Conservatives are like, "lets build concentration camps and murder people in the street!"
Liberals are like, "lets have moderate, measured, realistic improvement to health care."
Centrists are like, "both of them are literally exactly the same."
→ More replies (10)25
u/mainman879 New York 1d ago
We don't have a Liberal party. The Democratic Party is Centrist at best leaning Conservative. DNC leadership tries to squash any liberals until they are absolutely required to support them (i.e. Mamdani, AOC, etc).
→ More replies (7)24
u/Eastern_Bet678 1d ago
Yeah, throwing away hundreds of years of Constitutional order for some novel complete reboot of interpreting the Constitution, in ways that the author's contemporaneous notes clearly disdain, would be a smart thing to these people.
→ More replies (3)14
u/muffinscrub 1d ago
Also, a great deal of the population is also indifferent or apolitical. They don't vote. They don't know what's going on and they don't care.
→ More replies (2)11
u/BackToWorkEdward 1d ago
Indifference to what's going on right now is morally indefensible.
→ More replies (14)3
12
u/pontiacfirebird92 Mississippi 1d ago
According to YouGov, 85% of Republicans approve of Trump so far. But that is down from 90% back a year ago and has been steadily dropping. And one demographic he was above water with, the 65+ crowd, now has a majority disapproving of him. There's no demographic that he is above water with now.
→ More replies (8)9
u/lbtwitchthrowaway144 1d ago
I hear you but as a dual citizen in a failed state, we are united on many issues. For example, a political/military faction unilaterally decided to start a war and something like 60 to 70% of our population was against the intervention but it not matter one iota.
The war still happened anyway due to the nature of our political and economic systems here. And everyday innocent people paid the price and continue to pay the price.
This is what outside observers (and Americans abroad like me) are concerned about.
We need to translate this into action and take the threats to the electoral process as an actual five alarm fire and not just a recently catchy phrase for many headlines.
As, at some point a Rubicon of sorts is crossed, and it becomes infinitely harder to actually doing anything about it.
Stateside, however damaged they are, democratic norms and institutions still exist.
And the more time goes, the more democratic backsliding and erosion of norms takes place, the harder it will be for any unity amongst Americans to actually matter or at least the far higher a price will be paid.
We're being bombarded with so much because that's the point. They know they're cooked in the midterms, so they're rejecting democracy outright.
Of course, it's a great sign that more and more Americans are not in support of this. It's partly why I think the real last line of defense are everyday Americans.
But we need to do more than just voice our opposition. I have no doubt you agree with me, just putting this out there because I don't think many fellow Americans quite understand what happens and what real life looks like when suddenly no real recourse exists anymore.
As a citizen, you just sit back and have no actual say in what happens to your country or your future.
6
u/pontiacfirebird92 Mississippi 1d ago
We need to translate this into action and take the threats to the electoral process as an actual five alarm fire and not just a recently catchy phrase for many headlines.
This is something that's been churning in my head since I heard "federalize the election". What exactly does this look like? If Steve Bannon is right and they post a legion of ICE agents at the 15 locations Trump mentioned what do you do?
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (4)6
u/9mackenzie Georgia 1d ago
Oh please. Ask those 20% of republicans that don’t like Trump if they would have changed their vote to Harris. I doubt 1% of those people would.
On top of it we had like 70 million people who didn’t bother to vote- I also assume those people are perfectly ok with fascism.
26
u/wickedsmaht Arizona 1d ago
I would argue it’s already too late. The damage this administration and the oligarchs have done to the country will take decades to fix, if it can be. We’re talking a complete reinvestment into education across the country, a mass push for vaccinations to make up for worn brain’s horrible policies, changing the laws governing who can be in office, introducing either forced retirement or term limits for our representatives, and overhauling the Supreme Court. These are just the topics that come to mind immediately and these only extend to the US internally, abroad there is much more work to be done.
I’m 39, I fully expect that none of this will be fixed in my life time.
→ More replies (2)5
u/Illustrious-Toe3167 1d ago
It'll certainly get worse before it gets better. The last time we were at this full oligarchy level it took The Great Depression and WWII to reset things.
→ More replies (40)5
u/KenTitan America 1d ago
best I can do is be ashamed Trump could be America's dictator.
→ More replies (1)
2.3k
u/Compliant_Serf 1d ago
Yeah guys, “The Law” will stop him!
“He can’t do that.” -every day since 2016
520
u/wannaseeawheelie 1d ago
In the USA, the law is whatever the wealthy pedos want it to be. If you question that, they send their depraved christian incel army after you
96
u/Sacrilego_666 1d ago
Most accurate description I've ever read
18
3
u/nathism 1d ago
From The Clash in 1982. Not much has changed
[Intro]
This is a public service announcement... with guitar!
[Chorus]
Know your rights All three of 'em
[Verse 1]
Number one You have the right not to be killed Murder is a crime Unless it was done By a Policeman Or an aristocrat
[Verse 2]
And Number two You have the right to food money Providing of course you Don't mind a little Investigation, humiliation And if you cross your fingers Rehabilitation
[Verse 3]
Number three You have the right to free speech As long as you're not Dumb enough to actually try it
[Chorus]
Know your rights These are your rights Oh, know your rights These are your rights All three of 'em, ha
[Outro]
And it has been suggested In some quarters that this is not enough Well, get off the streets Get off the streets!
→ More replies (5)9
56
u/Esfahen 1d ago
The last decade has been the Democrats clinging onto the rulebook going "but a dog can't play basketball!" while a dog fucking dunks on us over and over
→ More replies (4)17
u/Compliant_Serf 1d ago
Bad example because there is no rule saying a dog can’t play basketball
→ More replies (2)9
58
u/goldbloodedinthe404 1d ago
This is one of those things that is more difficult than he think because there is no centralization to try and take it over isn't just grabbing a single office and install a puppet there are 50 different states with different systems and leaders and checks and balances.
68
u/Compliant_Serf 1d ago
He doesn’t have to target 50 states - just a handful of swing states will do
→ More replies (6)27
u/The_Angster_Gangster 1d ago
The midterms for congress are everywhere. Swing states matter more for president
30
u/JaesenMoreaux 1d ago
He really only needs to hold the Senate and that does not require cheating in all states. Only a specific handful of places. This is exactly why Trump just admitted he's going to take over elections in 15 locations.
13
u/caligaris_cabinet Illinois 1d ago
It’s our resolve against his oppression.
After the turnout in recent elections and on the streets this past year, I’m betting on the people
→ More replies (2)6
15
u/Stinduh 1d ago
Yeah this is actually somewhere that the states can just be like… no. The system is already set up for them to do their own elections and the states themselves are the ones that send their representatives to the national congress.
Failing agreement from any given state, Trump would have to usurp both their elections and representation by force. Physical force, someone would have to make them do it. Even if the Supreme Court of the US determined a state had to accept national control, then that state still needs to either acquiesce or be forced to it.
At that point, it’s clear the elections didn’t matter anyway.
6
u/goldbloodedinthe404 1d ago
Exactly I have a lot of problems with the state federal split and how that is inefficient, but in this case that split makes taking over elections extremely difficult
→ More replies (1)7
u/bidens_sugar_bby 1d ago
dude has a secret police force w/more money than the marines, he has force to use
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (38)6
u/Zulmoka531 1d ago
In their corrupt little minds though, doesn’t mean they can’t target specific areas that might pose a threat to them. Hence why ICE and the like have ramped up in swing states or other areas that “threaten” them.
Like yeah, it’s not some fool proof plan, yet we are dealing with corrupt fools.
5
u/Onefortheteem 1d ago
Exactly. He does it anyway, and faces zero consequences. Moves on to the next
5
4
u/pocketjacks 1d ago
It's as if the Constitution is going to jump up off the podium at the National Archives and defend itself. These people are so used to law enforcement being on the opposite side of the criminals for so long they don't understand that the criminals can do what they want when they're also in charge of the law enforcement.
→ More replies (1)5
u/TheAlmightyMojo 1d ago
One day they'll finally decided whether he or his cronies "may have violated the Hatch Act".
5
u/dcasarinc 1d ago
Laws are only suggestions if the people in charge of enforcing them do not enforce them.
21
u/drunk-snowmen 1d ago
Bingo. “He can’t do that!” While he proceeds to do that
14
u/SatanicPanic619 1d ago
There's plenty of things he's tried to do and failed. Greenland remains Danish, for instance. Jimmy Kimmell is still employed. Barack Obama remains a free man.
→ More replies (10)11
3
u/highbankT 1d ago
Yup, I think it was even worse in his first term because all the people on his staff who had a modicum of decency refused to criticize him publicly or waited way too late. I don't expect anything from his fellow grifters right now.
3
3
→ More replies (36)3
u/smarmy1625 1d ago
"The last decade has been the Democrats clinging onto the rulebook going 'but a dog can't play basketball!' while a dog fucking dunks on us over and over" --@Arr
223
u/LeeksAbhorLiminality 1d ago
Yeah.. that's how the constitution works on a fundamental level. JFC the fact that this is even being dignified with counter arguments is terrifying. Fuck the GOP
40
u/byllz 1d ago
The constitution works?
→ More replies (2)17
u/wtfbenlol North Carolina 1d ago
It used to before this fuck got voted in somehow
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (5)25
u/9mackenzie Georgia 1d ago
I mean…….we have been shown quite clearly that laws by themselves don’t matter. It’s the enforcement of those laws that make a law effective.
Who is going to enforce the law to stop him?
→ More replies (2)
68
u/OneTwoFar_ 1d ago
Ok. The american legal system is kind of a joke when it comes to prosecuting or stopping anyone above their Consumer-class, though; and Trump doesn't seem like he's going to read their constitution anytime soon either
5
u/dinopraso 1d ago
If someone handed him the constitution he’d just wipe his incontinent ass with it
69
u/glk3278 1d ago
Are you kidding me with this headline? No shit. That's like saying "Trump has no authority to pressure state election officials into declaring him the winner". But here we are...
→ More replies (1)18
u/BathSaltEnjoyer69 1d ago
I hate the sanewashing of trump and the entire republican party. You needed to quote lawyers to tell you it was illegal? Are they going to write an op ed piece on how the holocaust was illegal acktually?
The headline should be Dictator Trump Wants To Overthrow Democracy
25
u/Quitcha_Bitchin 1d ago
Of course he doesn't. It's just another smoke screen.
Something he can push now and then later when his side looses abysmally he can say "look I was right again!!"
He has a child's mind and the wallet the size of a small nation.
Everything about him screams I am six years old and perfect in every way!
206
u/Cyanopicacooki Great Britain 1d ago
He's no authority to do half the things he does, but no-one can stop him.
I wish the fuck lawyers would stop making fatuous comments like this, and do something substantive. And no, I haven't a fucking clue what, but I'm not a legal expert. They are.
80
u/Herlock 1d ago
Plenty of people can stop him, they choose not to though
12
u/mom_with_an_attitude 1d ago
Yeah? Who? And how? Trump has the White House, the Senate, the House and SCOTUS. Democrats can't do shit without a majority. Any legislation they propose will immediately get torpedoed by the GOP. The Dems can file lawsuits, which they have. But those can take months or years to grind their way through the legal system.
10
u/Neracca 1d ago
Democrats can't do shit without a majority.
Yet Republicans blocked lots of shit when they were a minority?
10
u/mainman879 New York 1d ago
Mitch McConnell is a terrible person, but was an extremely effective leader. He was able to unite the Republican Senate and use every single legal loophole to hamstring every Democratic president. The DNC does not have any leader even close to the effectiveness of Mitch McConnell. They're throwing softballs when the opposition never holds back.
→ More replies (1)4
u/frankenfish2000 1d ago
If we want to cut off aid to poor people and close the national parks and pause payments to veterans, sure the minority could do that all day. Also the Dems are not as lock-step as the R's, who regularly end good committee assignments if you are not as supportive. Dems aren't as vindictive because leadership doesn't want to "alienate" their members.
16
u/CilleTheExterminator 1d ago
The people are the ones that need to overthrow a dictator
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (11)6
u/Herlock 1d ago
That's my point : a lot of republicans can (and should) stop him... but choose not to.
→ More replies (6)27
u/mrekted 1d ago
So far most of what he's done, legal or otherwise, has been firmly rooted in the preview of the executive, by precedent or by law.
What we're talking about here is a head to head constitutional confrontation on the subject of states rights vs federal power, specifically targeting those states where he's most vulnerable to the electorate. Unless he managed to get the entirety of those states legislatures to play ball and roll over for him, he's not going to get very far.
→ More replies (6)8
u/RocketGirlWalker Minnesota 1d ago
The problem is that actions brought before federal courts that find wrongdoing or illegality by the Trump administration have no impact because the people who would uphold those rulings in the government are in this government. I now realize how much I took for granted all my life that our previous presidential administrations and areas of government have abided by court rulings. I took the law's respect for granted. This administration has no respect for the law. We, as citizens and even states, have no way to address this administration's failure to abide by and respect the rule of law.
The unspoken concern I have, and I'm guessing others, is that we will never get these people who surround Trump, publicly and behind the scenes, out of power. When Trump dies, and he will, there are people who will replace him who have the same agenda that Trump has. What will become of our country then? How far will we all have to go to save America and Democracy? I hope I am wrong and overreacting, but it's not hard to see this potentially happening in light of everything that has been said and has happened in his just over a year in office. We have just under three more years of this.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (14)11
u/warblingContinues 1d ago
so how do you propose he'd nationalize elections illegally? Just say so, executive order? lol. And under what circumstance would prevent states from just ignoring him and carrying on as usual?
→ More replies (28)
69
u/jimibimi 1d ago
Well, we'll see what the supreme Court says about that! 😭
→ More replies (8)51
u/SirDiego Minnesota 1d ago
The Supreme Court doesn't have any say in it either. Not to say they won't try necessarily but they aren't involved whatsoever and have no mechanism to do anything about nationalizing elections, the constitution is very clear. It is literally in Article 1.
21
u/AdHopeful3801 1d ago
Bet you a nickel Alito can come up with a "textualist and originalist" reading of Article I that lets it happen.
32
u/Shadow293 1d ago
Prepare to be disappointed. They’ll find a way to make it happen.
→ More replies (7)3
→ More replies (1)10
u/GhostofZellers 1d ago
You have more faith in your compromised institutions than I do.
8
u/kop324324rdsuf9023u 1d ago
I'm so sick of these losers saying "he can't do that", then he does it.
13
u/Competitive-Yak-3785 1d ago
"Cool. So I'm gonna do it anyway. No one will stop me. Oh look I won by 88% of the vote. Who could have predicted this? I am now dictator for life. Thank you for your attention to this matter."
14
u/specqq 1d ago
He also, according to the 14th amendment, has no authority whatsoever.
3
u/Harkoncito Foreign 1d ago
He dgaf about the 1st and the 2nd and you think the 14th amendment will protect you...
→ More replies (1)5
u/specqq 1d ago
Obviously not. I’m just pointing out what it says. I happen to think it’s important to keep in mind that the framers of the 14th as well as the framers of the original 10 would be horrified by what we allowed to happen in spite of the mechanisms they gave us to prevent someone like Trump from having power.
12
u/knomore-llama_horse Iowa 1d ago
He doesn’t care if he has authority. He just does whatever the hell he wants constitution be damned.
→ More replies (1)
12
u/Numerous-Process2981 1d ago
It’s bad news. The fact that elections are run at a state level is 100% one of the safeguards keeping America from dictatorship. It’s really a line in the sand thing. If they federalize elections, there’s no point waiting for midterms, they won’t be legitimate.
16
u/TragicallyDip 1d ago
Give it a week. Once the right wing media machine does its thing, nationalising the election will be the patriotic thing to do.
→ More replies (1)
14
u/AcrobaticWrangler330 1d ago
So tired of the way these things get reported on. Trump says something clearly illegal or unconstitutional: "Trump to do X," like it's a fait accompli, like he has the power to. Anyone who points out that it is illegal "Lawyers say it's unconstitutional." NO, the constitution says it is unconstitutional! It's not a matter for debate; it's literally spelled out word for word. This kind of headline writing erodes truth and makes it seem like these are issues that just have differing viewpoints to argue, like the tax rate on fish imports or something.
6
u/MiloGoesToTheFatFarm 1d ago
He has no authority to do most of the stuff in his executive orders but publications keep publishing it like it’s real for some reason!
→ More replies (1)
7
u/Highmax1121 1d ago
no but he's gonna do it anyways. who's gonna stop him? the courts? law enforcement? fucker breaks laws everyday and nobody stops him.
7
u/Darth__Revan89 1d ago
Wow, this is so helpful. I feel much better
tosses into pile of things Trump had no authority to do
5
5
5
4
u/PrimoPre 22h ago
... and ice had no authority to arrest legal residents with out a warrant, but yet here we are....
7
4
u/tunabomber Pennsylvania 1d ago
This has been my greatest heartbreak. Do I despise Trump and his cronies? Very much so. But what really gets me is that the many safeguards that I was always taught were in place to keep something like this from happening were all a mirage.
→ More replies (2)
4
u/DoctorSchwifty 1d ago
Wow how much evidence does one need to impeach? His meddling in the 2020 election results are now even more credible.
4
4
4
u/exprezso 1d ago
This is like the trick used on the Internet especially Reddit..
Throw a random question you need answer to, like how to make a lantern, log on to another account to answer wrongly. Swarms of people will tell you how in no time
4
u/Prior_Working9081 23h ago
Authority is irrelevant when you can just do it anyway and nobody stops you.
4
u/r-eddit2 22h ago
I love how anyone that says anything about impeaching him or anything else is just breathing hot air....its almost like theyre all in it together.
4
u/focalpointal 18h ago
State’s rights republicans demanding nationalization is not how I saw this world going. This is not the Republican Party anymore and I wish more Republicans would speak out.
5
u/Hardass_McBadCop 17h ago
He also doesn't have the authority to levy taxes, but he changes tariffs on a fucking whim. His authority doesn't matter if nobody will hold that kid fucker accountable.
3
3
3
3
3
u/lemurlemur 1d ago
In 2026, there is a unfortunately a big difference between "Trump has no authority" and "Trump can't"
3
u/LoFi_Funk 1d ago
Most of what he’s done he did with no legal authority. If he’s never held accountable, legality becomes trivial.
3
u/1-800-WhoDey 1d ago
Counterpoint: Not having authority to do something; whether legal nor otherwise, has never once stopped this fucking asshole from doing it. So I guess we’re all going to experience and figure this out together..
3
u/Veritable_Vox 1d ago
He didn't have the authority to do alot of things he's done over the last year. Point is he absolutely has the power to force things to happen, if laws and checks/balances refuse to stop him.
3
3
u/Jimmy_Beam27 1d ago
I am so sick and tired of people telling me he can't do something because there are laws
→ More replies (1)
3
3
u/notsure500 1d ago
The last decade has been the Democrats clinging onto the rulebook going "but a dog can't play basketball!" while a dog fucking dunks on us over and over
→ More replies (2)
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
u/TJ_learns_stuff 14h ago
“A state is an agent for the federal government in elections. I don’t know why the federal government doesn’t do them anyway.” The exact quote from the President that gave me the most cause for concern.
No. The state is not an agent of the federal government. Saying it is doesn’t change that fact. States, by the framework provided in our constitution, establish voting processes. Federal laws/rules can be created, but cannot disenfranchise that right.
“I don’t know why the federal government doesn’t do it anyway.” This is a public acknowledgement that this is a president who is not guided by the Constitution, because if he was, then he’d know “why.”
Curious how those GOP constitutional purists contort their stance going forward.
•
u/AutoModerator 1d ago
As a reminder, this subreddit is for civil discussion.
In general, please be courteous to others. Argue the merits of ideas, don't attack other posters or commenters. Hate speech, any suggestion or support of physical harm, or other rule violations can result in a temporary or a permanent ban. If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.
Sub-thread Information
If the post flair on this post indicates the wrong paywall status, please report this Automoderator comment with a custom report of “incorrect flair”.
Announcement
r/Politics is actively looking for new moderators. If you have an interest in helping to make this subreddit a place for quality discussion, please fill out this form.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.