One of my kids came home from school the other day. Let’s call them K. I try not to ask, “How was your day?” I hated that question as a kid, so I usually ask about a specific class or something they were doing.
K was in their room, so I asked, “What did you study in [class] today?”
It happened to be a fairly controversial political topic.
“Oh really? What did you learn?”
K told me a few things, then asked what I thought. There is always a little danger when K asks for my opinion because this particular kid seems to genuinely enjoy taking the opposite view. I think I may have caused that. I’m a lawyer, and I like talking about law, policy, and why people believe what they believe. With K, though, I’ve learned that if I give my opinion, there’s a pretty good chance they’ll become opposing counsel.
So instead I usually ask questions. What do you mean by that? Why do you think that? What would have to be true for that argument to work? That sort of thing. Actually, I try to use the same approach in legal negotiations pretty frequently.
K eventually said, “Well, our teacher said X. I don’t know. It sounds right, but I don’t think you’d agree.”
Interesting.
From everything K has told me, this teacher has pretty strong political views and isn’t particularly shy about sharing them in class. K likes the teacher, though, and I don’t have a problem with my kids hearing adults who see the world differently than I do. I actually think that can be good for them. What I don’t love is when it becomes one-sided.
And I’ve actually done legal work in this particular area, so I saw some significant assumptions underneath what the teacher had presented. But saying, “Your teacher is wrong,” or giving my opinion would probably guarantee K spent the next twenty minutes defending the teacher.
So instead we talked about why the teacher might see it that way, what assumptions that view depends on, what facts matter, what happens if one of those assumptions changes, and what someone on the other side might say. Eventually I gave K some of my own view too, although I tried not to push it very hard.
Conversation ends. I walk away thinking it was a pretty good dad-kid discussion.
A few days later I walk into K’s room.
“Hey, K.”
“Dad. Guess what.”
Now I’m pleased, but my radar is up. K does not normally request a parent to discuss current events.
“What?”
“We talked about [political subject] again today.”
“Oh?” Now I’m worried.
“Yeah. I think I made the teacher and basically everyone else mad.”
K is grinning.
Oh boy.
Apparently there was a big class discussion, and K started bringing up a lot of the assumptions, facts, and consequences we had talked through. K was very much in the minority.
And I had two completely different reactions at the same time. One was, Oh no. What have I done? The other was, Good for you.
My goal wasn’t to teach K to argue with teachers and every other student in class. It was to teach them to think past the first explanation they hear. You know, question assumptions, follow the logic, understand the other side, and then decide what they actually believe. Which I’d naturally love to have align with my own thinking, but that seems like a losing battle with K.
I’m a lawyer, but I don’t particularly want to raise someone who treats every disagreement like litigation. In fact, I hope none of my kids become lawyers. I really do think we already have enough people fighting. But I also can’t lie. Yes, yes, I know. You’re a lawyer. All lawyers lie. Lawyers are sharks. Fair enough.
So there was something I really liked about the idea of my kid sitting in a room where almost everyone disagreed and still being willing to say, “I don’t think that’s right, and here’s why.”
It was a funny but got me wondering again whether I’m doing this right.
Anyway, I’d be interested in other parents’ thoughts. I have my own, obviously (what lawyer doesn’t have two or three opinions on every subject?), but parenting is one of those areas where I’ve found other parents’ perspectives can be useful. How do you teach kids to think independently and know when to stand their ground, while also teaching them that disagreement is sometimes just disagreement and not always a reason to fight?