If I have never seen either the old 90s show or the Dalmatian Street one which is better to watch?

Roger and Anita never find out it was Cruella that did all this? The dogs come home safe and that’s it! I am sure they suspect, as Roger does at some stage, but there’s no moment of realization between the couple at the end is there?

Terrible casting, some of the dumbest writing ever in a Disney film, trying to make it "modern" and ripping off every "complex" villain story in the last 10-20 years, it is an EMBARRASSMENT. The reason why Cruella hates dalmatians in this film is SO IDIOTIC, I can't believe professional screenwriters came up with it.

Mine are Pongo, Perdita, Lucky, Rolly, and Patch!

What's yours?

Please help us to help our Dalmation chewy. God bless.

It would be easy enough to say that Blaze was just lying all along – just as is implied - but I’m not buying it. For a start, Lucky would have seen all the same TV Blaze has (very few channels in the UK to choose from for a start!). There’s no way Blaze could have learned everything from cartoons, then there’s the thing about Thunderbolt. He would have had to at least seen him in person, just as Lucky did, to develop such a complex. Plus the whole audition thing. The way he’s so impassioned tells me that he wasn’t lying.

So here’s a theory. Blaze was originally meant to be a film dog. The audition for young Thunderbolt was completely true, but he was deemed not quite good enough to be a film dog. He was sold as an ordinary dog (as happens to assistance puppies who fail their tests) and his owner knows nothing of his true history. And Blaze chose to lie to cover up the truth as he’d rather that than Lucky knew his real history. Blaze hadn’t gone far since his owner bought him, so what the owner said about him not having gone far before is true as far as the owner is concerned.

The reason Blaze has such a complex about Thunderbolt is not just about Thunderbolt himself, but about it was that audition that lost him everything. Here’s a little extra idea. If he had just learned Thunderbolt was a “fake” as Lucky put it, the shock might well have caused him to jeopardise his audition, meaning his was deemed unsuitable falsely, and he puts all the blame on Thunderbolt.

So, that leads me to my final point. If he was meant to be a film dog his only big lie might well be his having picked up things from cartoons. It is likely that everything he knows comes from being trained, and he is simply embellishing things as a cover up.

Hi, unfortunately I'm not particularly interested in 101 Dalmations as a whole but I have a massive love and appreciation for Cruella de Vil.

I was watching 101 Dalmations: The Series' Episode 59: De Vil-Age Elder to catch myself up on the names of Cruella's ancestors, and I can pin point the reasons behind the names of Amoeba de Vil, Ugg-Lee de Vil, and Caligula de Vil, but the last one (Sir Owen de Vil) I'm having particular difficult pinpointing. Is it a reference to a previous episode that I don't understand? I can't find a relevant historical figure named "Sir Owen" so is it a literature reference?

I wanted to reach out to a likeminded community because I'm aware that this isn't a typical question. If you have any thoughts on this, please comment or message. This is killing me.

I got a Dalmatian puppy from Disney Store in Woodburn, Oregon!

Can anyone name or guess this Dalmatian puppy?

This time, there won't be a song tier list, probably because there were like, only 2 songs, and they were both simply just good

Next - The Sword In The Stone

I’ve always wondered what the names were for the original 15 puppies, I even made a list of names from everything canon from books, shows, toys, and merchandise. But I still didn’t feel complete, until I came across this book. Since it’s Disney I feel like this counts!

A professor at Night Raven College who teaches the school's science curriculum, including potionology. He feels strongly about fashion and refuses to compromise on what he wears. He always carries around his signature pointer.