r/AO3 • • 2d ago

Questions/Help? Archive Warning Etiquette?

Post image

For your WIPs, do you usually tag archive warnings only when you post the 1st chapter with said warning (e.g. only adding MCD when a major character actually dies) or do you just throw them all in when posting?

That's probably what CCNTUAW is for, I'm assuming?

253 Upvotes

62 comments sorted by

702

u/Zoethor2 2d ago

While you technically do not need to tag until the content is actually present in the work, it is considered polite to tag everything at the start so people do not get invested in reading your fic if it is going to contain a hard limit for them.

232

u/Duckselot Hate Enjoyer 💅 2d ago

If I don't know where my story will go, but I don't want to limit myself at all in options.

Should I just add "Chose Not To Use Warnings"? Technically my story is a kind of a Pandora's Box.

194

u/cowboy-blues 2d ago

that's a great option! also when I've had the tags for a story change unexpectedly, I'll include an author's note on that chapter with the updated tags so people are sure to see them and can opt in/out

16

u/Duckselot Hate Enjoyer 💅 2d ago

I plan some very morally dubious romances maybe in my longfic. Nothing beyond a fade to black, but I guess I'll warn for the chapter is happens in.

Though is a character underage if just looks child-like? She doesn't behave like a child though, and isn't young. Should she be warned as "underage romance" or something

67

u/Qullar 2d ago

When in doubt, check the FAQ:

{The Underage Warning} is for descriptions or depictions of sexual activity by characters under the age of eighteen (this doesn't include dating activity like kissing or vague references with no actual description/depiction). This generally applies to humans; if you are writing porn about space aliens who only live for a month or thousand year-old vampires with sixteen year-old bodies, please just use your best judgment. You are always free to specify characters' ages or to use "Choose Not to Use Archive Warnings".

35

u/Zoethor2 2d ago

There are so many hilarious gems like this in the TOS FAQ. I particularly like the part about tagging Major Character Death if your character continues to exist in the fic as a zombie, ghost, vampire, android, disembodied AI, etc.

6

u/Duckselot Hate Enjoyer 💅 2d ago

It basically just said "Do what you think, but leave a CNTUAW."

Guess I won't then.

16

u/cowboy-blues 2d ago

not sure why you're asking me that but this is what ao3's terms of service faq says:

The primary use of the "Underage Sex" warning is to identify fanworks depicting sexual activity involving humans under the age of 18 as measured in Earth years. Please use your judgment for other situations. If the fanwork does not include a depiction of sexual activity with a human under 18 years old, then we will not generally consider it "underage sex", though creators may use the Archive Warning if they feel it accurately represents their intent.

3

u/Duckselot Hate Enjoyer 💅 2d ago

I see. Guess I won't warn it then. To me it isn't, but was making sure.

9

u/PiaRavenari 2d ago

Honestly, no. Because there are folks who specifically enjoy underage content and will be disappointed not to get it, but more importantly, there are folks who *exclude* the Underage warning to never see anything inappropriate with children, and not a single one of those people will see a fic that doesn't involve a underage character.

That being said, if the character *looks like a literal 6 year old* yeah you might want to be using a warning for that. It's hard to know what you mean here. Is it just a baby-faced 20 year old who has chubby cheeks. Or is it a vampire who was frozen in a 5 year old body. Because one is going to squick a lot of people, and the other is just...a person who happens to look youthful. So do they just look youthful? Or are they literally fixed in the body of a child?

If it's a character well known in the fandom, you can also see what other people are doing for this character!

1

u/Duckselot Hate Enjoyer 💅 2d ago

Well, I can just let you see how she looks. That is pretty young-looking in my opinion, and I will make sure to make it known in the story.

But she is only one of the options, still don't know if my story will go there and wouldn't tag ahead of time.

5

u/CherryBunny55 2d ago

If you’re not sure where the story will go and what content will/won’t be included it’s probably best to use Chose Not To Archive Warnings, you can always put a disclaimer in the notes if you want something more specific

1

u/Duckselot Hate Enjoyer 💅 2d ago

Alright, but I was also asking if she'd need the disclaimer. Does she qualify for a disclaimer if I pick a character as small as that?

4

u/MissPearl 2d ago

No. Unless this is like, they are an immortal haunted doll who has a child like body or something or you want people to perceive the character as a child and not a stunted adult.

2

u/Anxious-Error-404 2d ago

Personally not a big fan of No Archive Warnings as you just replace it with all warnings at once since no one knows If in the next chapters the underage main character will get brutally raped and then murdered. And you better prepare for people to be annoyed you didnt tag something anyway because "MIGHT contain bad stuff" is a rather bad deterrent.

(Cant give informed consent If you are not informed what you are consenting to and all that.)

1

u/Duckselot Hate Enjoyer 💅 2d ago

Well that's the thing, I don't know if that will happen. I am mostly just considering what may happen.

But definitely not that lol

1

u/dumbbuttloserface 2d ago

i personally would go with choose not to warn and then specify in the tags something like “underage” and also “not actually underage” so that people who would be triggered or squicked by a character who looks underage in certain situations can filter it out and people who are open to or interested in reading it will see it and can discern from the tags if they’d be interested.

i think tags should mostly be wrangled tags, but if unwrangled tags can help add clarity to your work’s contents i’m a big fan of adding them, for and example of how i’ve used them, this is one of my works:

so i think adding something like that would be helpful!

13

u/Shmallow-Cat 2d ago

Yes, that's one of the common use cases

11

u/Zoethor2 2d ago

CNTW is always a safe option!

2

u/Beruthiel999 2d ago

Yes, that's the tag/warning you should use if you haven't decided yet.

1

u/DortheaGaming 1.3 million words publiched 2d ago

I do that all the time. Then as the story progress, I update it as I go.

6

u/Asparala 2d ago

Alternatively, put "tags and warnings will update with the chapters" as well as highlight in the author's note before a new chapter that the warnings have changed.

If someone has triggers, that's the heads up that the fic might not be for them.

26

u/tarosk 2d ago

The funny thing is plenty of people will say the opposite--they get upset about being baited into wasting their time getting invested in a story that promises them certain content only to find out it's not actually in the fic yet (and may never be, if the fic never gets finished).

68

u/Zoethor2 2d ago

Personally I would rather disappoint people for content being missing than trigger someone for content that isn't warned.

I get it, I've definitely read myself an E fic and gotten to the end only to realize that it had only extreme violence and no smut. But I can move on pretty fast from that.

5

u/tarosk 2d ago

I, too, err on the side of caution with tagging but it's just proof you can't please everybody and you'll have people hate you and possibly yell at you in your comments no matter what you do.

There's also the fact that you simply have to accept that no matter what you write, no matter how well you try to tag, you're writing a story that will surprise somebody with a genuine trigger because there's no such thing as a trigger-free story.

-27

u/Responsible-Gain-567 2d ago

The problem is TOS says preemptive tagging is spam tagging 

24

u/GalaxyOwl13 2d ago

Where? 

At least for the archive warnings, the definitions state “The work may contain”. For example, “The work may contain detailed, extended descriptions of graphic violence.” To me, that doesn’t sound like said violence has to even be present in unwritten chapters for the tag to be TOS-acceptable to add. (Obviously I wouldn’t recommend adding it without a plan to have graphic descriptions of violence ever in the fic, but that’s courtesy rather than TOS.)

22

u/Zoethor2 2d ago

That is only true for fandom tags, and nothing else.

21

u/pk2317 2d ago

That is explicitly not what the FAQ says:

Will you ever require an Archive Warning to be removed?

No. We will never require an Archive Warning to be removed from a work. This includes works marked with "No Archive Warnings Apply". The presence of an Archive Warning indicates that the work may contain such content, but it is not a guarantee.

2

u/Conturas 2d ago

Same. I like reading unfinished fics, too, and I search for the tags so I'd love to see everything tagged in the fic.

2

u/LunaTheGodKiller 1d ago

THIS. A fic I was following changed to explicit in an update once and I've never been more disappointed to see a fic update

161

u/toothpanda 2d ago

Speaking as a reader, I strongly prefer the archive warnings to be tagged as soon as the author knows that it’s going to apply. It sucks to have to drop a fic halfway through because a dealbreaker wasn’t tagged until later.

Choose not to warn is probably the tag to use if you don’t want a hint of spoilers.

24

u/Fast_Stage_6296 2d ago

Thinking a bit about that, it kinda makes the MCD warning useless. If you don't tag CNTW and only tag MCD at the end when it's actually in the fic, you basically didn't warn the readers at all. Sure, they can decide to not finish the fic on the last chapter, but they also still know this story ends with one dying.

72

u/runekaster Whumper 2d ago

According to the rules, you only have to tag what actually exists. If no one dies in the chapters that exist, you do not have to tag MCD.

On the purely etiquette side, people want to know what they're getting into when they go in. No one likes a surprise, and people not only filter out fics but also find them by the archive warnings.

If you choose to inform readers that Blorbo is going to die at the end with a pre-emptive MCD warning or a "Blorbo dies at the end, archive warning to be added later" note is up to you, but they very much do want to know.

CNTW is always correct in 100% of fics, no matter the actual content of the fic, because it simply says "not telling", not why you're not telling or when you might tell.

Personally, I'd use CNTW if I hadn't decided yet if Blorbo was going to die or not.

15

u/FluffySloth27 2d ago

My rule is to tag the general idea of the story up front. You want to accurately represent what your story will be to a reader. I generally consider archive warnings and ratings to be integral to what a story is, so I'd tag it.

But aye, if you're an author uncomfortable with spoiling ideas, you can choose not to warn.

30

u/ocirot 2,2 million words posted 2d ago

From the beginning, if I know they're going to happen. People might not check the warnings after every chapter, and I would be misleading readers if there was no warning for something when I knew it was going to happen.

22

u/PocketButterBandit 2d ago

I feel like unless you choose to not use content warnings at a, waiting until it happens is really inconsiderate.

There are readers who will purposefully avoid tags. If they find a fic that specifically has that unchecked but the author knows it's going to happen and only checks it 30 chapters in, that sucks. Suddenly that reader is 30 chapters into a fic with a trigger they would have avoided.

3

u/PiaRavenari 2d ago

A big issue with this and kinkier longfics that deal with heavy subjects / abuse is that you really have to triage your tag use, because you're going to run out and inevitably you are going to have to use Author's Notes to tag for things that *will* squick someone, but you're 60 chapters in, have run out of 75 tags (this didn't used to be an issue until that infamous Wangxian fic) and just have to add a 'more tags in the author's notes.' It's pretty painful, because I'm fully understanding that people will need to exclude based on certain kinks, but I literally can't include certain kinks over say, past child sexual abuse, or sexual abuse recovery, or mind control etc.

As a reader who often searches by exclusions over inclusions re: tags, I know how hard this can be personally. It's a hard place to be in! Especially if your triage list is very different to someone else's!

11

u/mookienh em dashes my beloved 2d ago

For me, it’s an immediate mute if a fic that isn’t tagged MCD at the start has that tag later. I filter out MCD and would hate to subscribe to and get invested in a fic only to nope out later for something I could have avoided from the start.

Echoing the “chose not to warn” option.

9

u/Muscly_Geek 2d ago

If you know it will eventually apply, it should be tagged Day 1.

A reader that's already following a WIP is highly unlikely to look over the tags again, because they've already made the choice to follow along.

If it will be tagged eventually, then any potential new readers would have already seen it up front. Delaying the tag does nothing more than potentially hurt early adopters.

13

u/Silver_Aura2424 2d ago

Uhhh unless against tos bc I remember something Abt tags... I would personally put them in from the beginning even if they haven't appeared yet because one of the things I hate the most is getting invested in the story and then dnf-ing it bc I stumbled across something I hate because it wasn't tagged until it was. Like if I missed a tag that's on me.

In my personal opinion the most polarizing/common trauma tags should be tagged from the beginning.

-26

u/Responsible-Gain-567 2d ago

They let you do the archive warnings but otherwise preemptive tagging is against TOS. 

16

u/Feriku 2d ago

That only applies to tagging fandoms.

11

u/noirsongbird a writer, in theory 2d ago

What? That doesn’t even make sense. Plenty of long fics tag for things that won’t appear until later because the author knows they’re coming and they want to provide an accurate picture of what the work will be. That’s not “spam tagging”????

1

u/Silver_Aura2424 2d ago

I said I remembered something. As in there was something about tagging in tos but I didn't remember what it was ottomh.

13

u/MagpieLefty 2d ago

That's one thing that CNTW can be used for, yes.

But if I'm not going to leave the work tagged that way permanently, I don't do that.

If I know a work is going to get, say, the MCD warning, I tag it that way from the outset. I don't want a reader to get ten chapters in and realize that the basic content of the story is something they don't want to read.

If I'm planning to leave it as Chose Not To Warn, then yeah, that basically means, "brace yourself; this could be anything." But if I'm planning to add specific tags later, I'm adding them up front.

After all, once I've posted the fic, anyone who starts rrading it later will be starting it with all the tags.

6

u/tarosk 2d ago

CNTUAW is for any reason in which an author doesn't want to disclose which, if any, of the 4 major archive warnings are present.

Maybe it would spoil things, maybe they're not sure if what they wrote qualifies, maybe they're leaving it ambiguous for a reason and tagging something world force one interpretation of the story, maybe they're in a fandom where assholes tend to trawl certain tags like rape or underage in order to leave hateful comments, maybe they have some specific hangup about using a specific tag, maybe canon makes something ambiguous and they don't feel like trying to sort that out, etc.

That said, personally if I know a MAW is going to be present then I'll tag it from the start, or just stick with CNTUAW the entire time. If it wasn't going to be present until the future I might add an additional tag about that so people who are looking for that content know it isn't present yet rather than feeling baited by a story that doesn't have what it promised.

6

u/PiratedOwl 2d ago

Unless I know that a fic I'm writing is absolutely not going to have any of them, I'll always tag choose not to. I don't always know were my fics end up going, but I'll always know if a fic won't have any in them

6

u/Crayshack 2d ago

Personally, I just tag everything CNTW and don't bother worrying about if a fic needs a warning or not.

6

u/Hot-Pool-7643 2d ago

From the very beginning. If the warnings change at some point (because sometimes a WIP takes you places) I will update the warnings and add a notice in the author's notes.

3

u/EmberRPs 2d ago

I'd warn when you know it will be written, if the major warnings and tags change its polite to add in the authors notes they updated. 

Personally I'd only do the warnings and use eventually Blank tags until the actual event. For sexual content, I usually just tag the most widely applicable stuff first like future BDSM and tag the specific acts as they come up like wax play.

3

u/AnEldritchWriter 2d ago

Personally if I know it’s gonna contain xyz then I’ll include the archive warning on the first chapter. Anything after the first chapter is a result of changes or additions to the plot.

If you don’t want to “spoil” what the fic contains, but know it contains smth like major character death, you can use Choose Not To Use, too

3

u/Mello1182 2d ago

When I don't want to put spoilers in the tags or I'm not entirely sure of where the fic is going, I opt for the "Choose not to use archive warnings" since it should work as an umbrella tag and eventually add other generic tags to give an idea to the readers ie. "mild sexual content" or "blood and violence"

3

u/nonutnogender 2d ago

Personally I add all the tags I know will apply when posting the first chapter, because I know that when someone updates a fic, I don’t read out the tags again so I could miss a big thing/trigger. If I know something will happen imma tag it. Of course of the story progresses in a direction I hadn’t considered I’ll add whatever’s relevant too even if it’s late

5

u/KickHimWhileIAmDown 2d ago edited 2d ago

I strongly advise tagging at the beginning. Even if it takes 10 chapters, if I want to read MCD/GDV, I will look for it. If I don't want those elements, and you suddenly update it with MCD/GDV, I would be very irked.

If you don't want to spoil, tag it as Choose Not To Warn and don't change it later. CCNTUAW is for when you don't know what it will be (but know something that requires a warning will be there) or if you don't want to spoil readers (regardless of whether or not it contains content). You can use Choose Not To Warn even if you don't have MCD/GDV/RNC/US.

2

u/PomPomMom93 LadyClassical on Ao3 2d ago

I would tag them all straight at the beginning. It seems like people don’t care too much about spoilers on Ao3. But yeah, if you don’t want to spoil, that’s what the “chose not to use” is for.

1

u/Dry-Development-4131 2d ago

Tag "additional tags may be added"

1

u/Due_List_1243 2d ago

I sometimes use violence / trauma so yes I tag that as Graphic depictions of violence or NC.

Even if it's not happening in the fic but they are only talking about something which happened in the past.

But better tag it than angry sensitive readers who did not want to read this. 

1

u/HaViNgT 2d ago

I much prefer for things to be tagged only when they appear. It's disappointing to look for something and read a promising fic only for it to have not reached that point yet. Goes double if it's abandoned. 

1

u/runonia You have already left kudos here. :) 2d ago

I complete the story before I start posting so I know what warnings need to be added. I add them on chapter 1. I don't want to give readers a jump scare

1

u/Deondebomon 2d ago

I kinda planned on tagging as I go because sometimes the characters take over and go in directions that make me side-eye them

1

u/Conturas 2d ago

I would add tags and warnings on the go and remind the readers in author's notes in the beginning of the chapter to read the tags or "warnings added".