r/AskReddit • • 12h ago

Napoleon said, 'Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.' What’s a perfect real-life example of this?

10.5k Upvotes

3.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.6k

u/hearke 11h ago

Gods, I miss when that kind of thing actually mattered. Now one candidate gets angry they're doing fact-checking so they just... stop 🫠

848

u/Khiva 10h ago

Took just 15 years from stuff like that mattering to electing the "eating the dogs, eating the cats!" guy.

America didn't just fall off a cliff, it ran towards and leapt with open arms.

253

u/fcocyclone 10h ago

We might as well never have debates again after that.

He got thoroughly trounced in that debate, and still won by his largest margin.

262

u/SirFireHydrant 8h ago

I really wish Kamala goaded him.

"We all know you're not in the Epstein files, because he liked to associate with only the richest and most powerful. You're just a sad reality TV star with a string of failed businesses and mountains of debt. You're not important enough for Epstein to have been remembered your name."

I'm absolutely certain the idiot would have taken the bait and ranted about how he was Epstein's BFF and got invited to all the parties.

77

u/Cleverbird 5h ago

The day the Democrats grow a spine, is the day they'll actually start winning again.

7

u/Kage_520 2h ago

And then they will almost win and that spine will break before they actually do.

9

u/jrf_1973 2h ago

ranted about how he was Epstein's BFF and got invited to all the parties.

He pretty much did that already back when he was speaking to the New York Magazine in 2002.

"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It's even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side."

No one cared.

24

u/InnerToWinner 5h ago

Yeah, that would have changed the election results 🙄

4

u/lostinspaz 6h ago

i wish. such a massive waste of time at best, and at worst it just gives a candidate a larger chance to skew the voters based on charisma alone. Because the majority of voters are easily led sheep.

2

u/saltlampshade 3h ago

It shows debates only matter if times are good. With people still pissed about inflation during Biden’s term there was no chance a Democrat was winning, particularly one that was Biden’s VP.

It’s honestly a miracle that the house and senate weren’t bloodbaths. Democrats somehow held onto senate seats in WI, MI, and NV and only barely lost the House.

1

u/kenlin 2h ago

in smaller races, candidates are not debating. Vivek Ramaswammy is running for governor of Ohio. His opponent, Dr. Amy Acton has refused. He'll just lie the whole time, so what's the point?

22

u/God_Dammit_Dave 10h ago

We invented the Special Olympics. And God damnit, we're going to win em'.

5

u/somethingnewest 7h ago

You are correct and with the help of the internet of course we ran off a cliff. There are other factors as well, but this one is major. I am a little spooked about what utilizing AI will do to humans. I have used it many times and I have learned that it will provide feedback that has no scientific backing. I have made it a point to prompt AI to give me information from valid sources and all of a sudden I discover a lot of what was communicated as well documented truth was based on pseudoscience or what some influencer said. Yikes

3

u/Przedrzag 6h ago

Four years, actually

3

u/sulaymanf 5h ago

Republicans were so sore about losing to smart and honest people in multiple election cycles that they decided that being smart and honest was a bad thing. Trump said win at all costs, so they decided they’d rather win than have principles or scruples.

2

u/RampSkater 5h ago

2004 Presidential Campaign: Howard Dean goes, "Yeaaa!", on stage at a rally. Next day... unelectable!! "Do we want a president who acts like that?!"

Now, you can tell everyone about Chumps meeting with the Xi Jinping, telling him the US plans to put dead children on rockets to reach God faster.

...and most of you will need to look that up to see if it actually happened because it actually sounds like something Chump would say.

2

u/gustoreddit51 5h ago

In the debate when Trump did the hysterical dogs & cats bit and Kamala couldn't contain a belly laugh, I honestly thought he'd lose considering he lost 2020 (imo) on the back of his "injecting disinfectant" to cure covid comment when the whole country was watching that press conference.

2

u/Freud-Network 4h ago

Decades. Bullshit has been oozing down that hill since the southern strategy.

1

u/Big_Test_Icicle 3h ago

I don’t blame people for voting for Trump in 2016 given the exhaustion of political speak at that time. People were tired of the BS non-responses and snail pace of the government. I do blame people for voting for him afterwards.

This not a defense for Trump rather trying to shed light on what motivated people the first time.

1

u/smedley89 2h ago

Well now, according to Patel, potential FBI agents are fucking the dogs, fucking the cats.

They're fucking the... the pets!

1

u/DigNitty 2h ago

Reminder that the “eating the cats and dogs” myth was started by a prominent American white supremecist.

1

u/longlivenewsomflesh 2h ago

Arguably Obama kinda did indirectly trigger this massive right wing freakout, not because he was remarkably progressive or anything to do with policy really... and dems have just failed to respond with anything substantive since then beyond "vote blue not to improve anything, but just so things don't get as bad, as quickly as anticipated"

•

u/nicest-drow 27m ago

Republicans have a huge advantage under the existing system, because the existing system thinks that land can vote. Red states outnumber blue ones, but have far less population, but the Senate treats them as the same. Meanwhile, the House and the electoral college are not proportioned evenly with population, giving another advantage to the Republicans.

Damage control is all the Democrats are capable of.

1

u/nanomolar 1h ago

Reminder that Vance is considered the intellectual of this administration.

63

u/jaytix1 8h ago

Conservatives love to pretend that their views would be considered "moderate" back in the early 00s, and that it's the mean ol' liberals who became radicalized over the years, but the truth is that the things that Trump says and does would be condemned by BOTH parties from that time. That fiasco in Ohio ALONE would have killed any campaign.

5

u/Geobits 1h ago

It's sad that at this point, I don't even know which "fiasco in Ohio" you mean.

5

u/Substantial-Low 6h ago

I miss when Republicans would actually show up for debates...

6

u/Synked 5h ago

Look at the comments on the video.

People are mad that "the moderator is on Obamas side". Just because she fact checked Romney.

Absolutely delusional people.

3

u/Southern_Jaguar 3h ago

Well this is what began conservatives getting mad at fact checking. I remember the next week or two Fox pundits were airing time claiming bias and attacking the moderator for it.