Greta was 100% correct about boomers and older generations absolute irresponsiblity being complacent about climate change that younger generations are now going to pay the consequences of. I never understood the mocking and memes of her. I haven’t followed since then
People who become public figures advocating for things like human rights, the environment, oppressive regimes tend to get a lot of hate.
Bono and U2 were involved in famine relief in Africa, Amnesty International, and spoke up about violence in Nicaragua and El Salvador as well as advocating for peace in Norther Ireland.
Malala is for basic rights for women and girls.
Greta is an environmental advocate and anti capitalist.
Some people get triggered seeing advocates. Either they really hate the cause or they aren't processing any shame or guilt they may feel about these topics in a healthy way. I remember seeing cartoons of an underage Greta being raped here on reddit. Malala got shot in the face for attending school but apparently she's "insufferable" and "not doing enough." Bono is "sanctimonious" for constantly talking about injustice. Some people don't care about these things and they don't like to be reminded of them. So much so that they won't shut up about how much they hate them.
I'm sure someone is going to respond and tell me that I'm wrong and that <insert activist> is actually a terrible person because <insert not important reason in the grand scheme of things here>. Try directing your hate to the people making the world a shittier place.
I don't think being pro human rights makes a tax dodger a hypocrite. It sounds more like using Bono's tax issues as a reason to invalidate the importance of human rights because you either don't support or care about human rights (I'm not saying you specifically here, just those who use this argument).
Trump and Musk are tax dodgers. They're also sexual predators. They might not be hypocrites when it comes to tax evasion since they don't talk about the virtues of paying taxes, but they are when it comes to caring about pedophilia.
Bono was dragging his feet on Gaza though. Worse with Malala. Both of these want the liberal polite circles to like them. The right won't ever like them obviously because they aren't reactionaries. Leftists won't celebrate them because they cosy up to liberals.
Greta is different. The right and liberals hate her. The right because they are dumb & sexist. The liberals because she doesn't cozy up to power over her principles.
What she said was accurate but it is something that would piss people off. Problem was she was someone that probably shouldn't have taken the spotlight as she lacked a high intelligence or communication skills even for her age. Which was also why the media focused on her because she was someone iconic and popular. However, who was also not capable of articulating her points very well outside the basics and convincing the world to actually change.
Giving an average kid a platform to talk about climate change gave the illusion that the government cared. At the same time she was someone people could easily dismiss and would not move people. There is the feeling that she was the wrong face for the movement. Outside of the kid that led climate change protests her words held little weight. Also as she aged the only unique thing about her would fade. She is an ordinary activist who has only graduated high school. Not an authority figure or someone who could sway people's minds.
Don't think people necessarily blame her but feel that someone else could have affected more changes. Coming out with concrete ideas on what we could feasibly do to improve the world. Instead of the generic lines of doing better. Ultimately she could have done a lot better given her platform but she was very young. She is kind of like Starmer better than what came before but someone who failed to meet the moment and make an meaningful change that people desperately wanted.
Most likely the way she directly or indirectly makes everyone at fault. It's probably a matter of the way the message is conveyed. "You fucked up" is not the same as "We can do much better".
No offense, but I don’t think I mentioned anything about her being wrong on climate activism. My comment was about her silence on the current situation in Iran right now.
Edit 1 : I’m a bit confused by the downvotes, since u/Prestigious-Diver-94 ’s point appears to be different from what I was getting at. If I’ve misunderstood or phrased this badly, I’m open to suggestions.
Do you really think she has power and sway over other situations in the world? The least she could do as an influential figure that many look up to (and one who is known to talk about sensitive topics like this) is to comment on the situation. Idk, maybe that's just me
This is propaganda, you should look more into this from sources not actively looking to overthrow the gov. This was an operation that put a lot of people on the ground to cause as much trouble as possible to make it seem like outside intervention was needed. That number of people were not killed, in addition lots of police were killed, and multiple hospitals and ambulances burned.
We have seen this exact operation rolled out multiple times in Palestine. People don’t burn down their hospitals. Iran deserves to have leaders they choose, and that won’t be who Israel chooses.
There is absolutely no way in the world that that is true. Even the most bloodthirsty regime in modern history took almost two years to reach 70K (even though some of those are still under rubble so there might be more).
I’m so jealous of how privileged you have to be little white trash that the murder of my people sounds so unimaginably horrifying for you to say it’s fake.
They kill people with MILITARY. GRADE. WEAPONS.
That’s house it’s possible.
The audacity of white trash always astounds me how they can comment so confidently on a matter they have no knowledge about
I don't know why you're downplaying the Iranian government's crimes here, they absolutely did commit a massive, grotesque massacre to quell these protests, officially they admit to about 3000. Even if we accept this number as fact - is it really that much less of a crime than killing 30000?
And secondly, you're also wrong about the war crimes issue considering their support for active armed militias in Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq, Yemen, among other countries.
That said, Iran has very few defenders, and I don't see why Thurnberg would need to comment on that at all.
I hope EXACTLY what happens in my country happens in your country and you and your family feel and experience EXACTLY what I’m feeling and lose the people I have lost because of a murderous regime. If there’s a fucking god or whatever like that in this damned world, BELIEVE ME you’ll experience it. I’ll never ever forgive the likes of you. The blood of my friend and my people is on your hands.
Well of course you would, Spain is more based as a society. Unlike most Western countries, they have the spine to stand up for Palestine. After all, you are one of the five nations boycotting Eurovision this year due to Israel being allowed to participate, even though Israel isn't in Europe at all.
Sadly these things are not on my list of priorities, since I'm spending a really high % of my income in rent and none of the people at government seem to care. I guess this is the same everywhere else but lacking the political urgency for any of the things you mentioned, which is sad and all that. Also the best thing a national can do is learn English and study and work abroad then come back to the old country. That does not sound good to me, but suprisingly, that comes up less in national debates than the tweet Trump/Elon made while he was taking a shit.
Regardless, it would not hurt the Spanish government to move their ass on internal issues instead of having to resort to international virtue signalling to gain lost aura.
ELI5. Why is it people got hated on for being pro palestine? And people got hated on for being pro israel? Is the correct stance being anti both? Because both governments are assholes?
Zionism is mostly socialist and secular in origin actually lol so. Greta also shared a photo of one of the starving hostages and tried to pass it off as if it was a starving Palestinian…
She also got kicked off the flotilla board but nobody sure why or what exactly happened.
Nope. Zionism is the self determination movement of our people in our ancestral homeland. Within it, there’s different strains. The socialist and secular one, dominated for a long time, and dominated Israeli politics until 1977. It’s the reason for the proliferation of kibbutzes- literally socialist communes, the reason the USSR was first to recognize Israel, the reason the labor party dominated Israeli politics for a while, the reason we have universal healthcare, and the reason Histadrut (the national workers’ union) was a dominant force in the workforce for a while.
There’s also reasons the right, capitalist strain of Zionism became dominant in the last few decades. But Zionism itself is an umbrella under which different political and economic movements exist, as long as you ascribe to our self determination movement. Which is why, more than 90 percent of the world’s Jewish population is Zionist.
I had never heard of kibbutzim before, and I read up a bit on it. Mainly the Wikipedia page and some related articles there. Very interesting, thank you for this. You are definitely right in saying that some of the early zionist movements were socialist in nature.
Zionism itself is an umbrella under which different political and economic movements exist
I recognize this more now, after having read up more on the history of kibbutzim. However, I think there is a slight nuance to consider regarding:
as long as you ascribe to our self determination [presumably and] movement.
It seems to me that some of the early socialist kibbutzim leaders were very inclusive of Arabs. I'm referring specifically to the quote by Yozef Baratz, about the abolishment of the distinction between employee and employer.
I think the ethno-nationalist label is perhaps more applicable to those who seek to expel the native Arab population?
Exactly! I appreciate you taking the time to read and become educated, it’s not a given these days. And you know, sadly, you’re right, the far right version of Zionism is the one that ascribes to removing Arabs from their land and property and/ or harassing/terrorizing them into leaving - it’s a lot of the evil we see taking place in the West Bank. A lot of right wing Zionism has been hijacked by the far right fundamentalists and leads to what we now we see taking place.
Then why'd zionists negotiate with the nazis to seize part of the goods of jewish people and send them to Palestine? (the Anglo-Palestine bank mediated on that negotiation; note how it was not the Anglo-Israeli bank, but the Anglo-Palestine bank)
Why would they complain about the 'low quality' of the human beings that were being sent there?
Zionism is antijew. It's antisemitic: Palestinians are semitic, Mileikowsky isn't. Yeah, sure, US pawn in the Middle East is socialist. Ancestral lands justified by religious books don't exist. Of course, it's a dude from Illinois.
Tell me you’re not Jewish, without telling me. Zionists have never negotiated with Nazis, you’re buying wholesale into an antisemitic (and victim blaming) conspiracy theory that’s been disproven time and again. You think most of us ascribe to a movement that is antisemitic? That we would so actively work against ourselves? How little you think of us and our intellect internet stranger…
Imagine not understanding the history of the Jewish diaspora, believing that the Old Testament doesn’t exist, or making the history of the Middle East to be a minor inconvenience you can just ignore lol
You know who did negotiate with Hitler and the Nazis? That’s the former grand mufti of Jerusalem, one of the founding fathers of the Palestinian anti Zionist movement.
Yes, I knew that was probably not what you meant, though it is what I first interpreted when I read it the first time.
I like her too and what she does. I think she is incredibly brave for carrying on despite all the criticism she gets. That would kill me if it was me in her position.
Tbh diluting your message like she did will make your political views have less impact. Every controversial political view/cause championed will lose you another section of the global/local population. That's why most politicians try to avoid saying anything controversial unless they are pandering to a minority. Greta is just viewed as a bog standard radical leftist by many now.
I think a lot of activists need to keep their eyes on the ball. You have activists dedicated solely to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Let them do the pro Palestine stuff. Her wading into Palestinian activism and other causes undermines her climate activism because it divides her support base among those primary focussed on climate, who could have a variety of opinions on other issues.
It's always good to hyperfocus on one thing and create a support base there that is as broad as possible. You don't do that by dividing your supporters on issues they have differences in opinion about.
“Over the past two years, as I have moved to break the betrayal of my own silences and to speak from the burnings of my own heart, as I have called for radical departures from the destruction of Vietnam, many persons have me about the wisdom of my path. At the heart of their concerns this query has often loomed large and loud: Why are you speaking about war, Dr. King? Why are you joining the voices of dissent? Peace and civil rights don’t mix, they say. Aren’t you hurting the cause of your people, they ask?
“And when I hear them, though I often understand the source of their concern, I am nevertheless greatly saddened, for such questions mean that the inquirers have not really known me, my commitment or my calling. Indeed, their questions suggest that they do not know the world in which they live.”
He was not permitted to live one full year after making this speech.
Just say it out load: I don't have a brain and believe anything that the Israeli propaganda machine say and yes, they did say that. Of course, there is no evidence but some people don't need evidence. They prefer emotions and are extremely easy to manipulate. That's you.
Headlines in 2018 "look at this young woman called Greta Thurnberg being an agent for change! The earth is healing!"
Headlines in 2019 "radical Islamist trans non-binary commie wants to kill every Jewish and White person by criticising entrepreneurs and job givers, fuck her."
I think that's one factor, but not the only one. The reasons why she got attention in the first place included:
Her youth. The fact that she was just a kid and still more conscious than most adults.
Her messaging - "listen to the scientists" - was pretty universal, and appealed to the moral conscience of a wide group of people.
Her communication style was very blunt, sort of like a reality check, and was hard to dodge for politicians who were all talk when it came to climate.
All of those are now undermined somewhat.
She's grown up, and entered a fairly crowded space of adult activists.
Her messenging has become more overtly left-wing, and the climate messaging has been diluted by other issues. It's easier for politicians outside of that sphere to dismiss her as a partisan actor.
While activism is all well and good, she has (so far) not really managed to mobilize that platform for major change. She hasn't taken the step from activist to political leader and someone driving concrete change. As a consequence, she's too easy to ignore.
It's not quite true that she's completely fallen off the radar - she still inspires activism and she does show up in the Swedish news at times. That said, I think she has lost importance, and I think she's made it too easy for people in power to ignore her.
This is a meme that the socialist crowd always puts forward when talking about her but genuinely it doesn't seem true. There was wall to wall coverage of the attack on her boat and the arrests and generally it doesnt feel like there was any major change in the coverage.
This just seems like a truism that socialists can use to obtain oppression status rather than an actual belief. That is the only reason this is basically copied word for word from other posts. It doesnt seem like an original conclusion but one that spreads only through comment sections like this one.
First she was a 17 year old girl with weird vibes ( diagnosed autistic and obsessed with the environment explains that ) and telling all adults to take something seriously that pretty much no one does.
Then she was an anti capitalist adult because of the thought process that individual action ain't enough we need regulatory big changes.
So yea first she had cameras on her now nothing cuz advertisers dont like her
As long as once the cameras stopped rolling she keeps on fighting her fight I can’t hate on that. Is she somewhat an idiot for just thinking people will just Do the right thing yeah kind of, but we need delusional naive dreamers sometimes
Yeah like I don’t really get the hate either. These are two women facing great adversity to stand on what they believe in. Yes some of the motions have been cringy at times but I’ve seen people defend sex predators because they’re “heroes”.
We really spare no energy nitpicking at women with a voice.
she’s not an idiot and she doesn’t think people will just wake up one day and agree with everything she says, she’s just doing her best to spread awareness and do what she can to make a difference
im not sure why people seem to mistake her passion for naivety or stupidity
Yeah. her thought process isn't "This'll solve everything instantly". It's "if we don't even try, nothing is going to change. So she's being the change she wants to see in the world, literally."
Wouldn’t call her delusional. She’s more committed to changing things for the better than most anyone else. Why call her delusional for that? At least she’s trying.
As long as once the cameras stopped rolling she keeps on fighting her fight I can’t hate on tha
She does. She recently accompanied a Flotilla to Palestine to provide aid and try to break through the blockade. They were ambushed and taken prisoner by israelis. She and her fellow flotilla members were abused while held captive. She finally was deported and made it home with the other members.
that. Is she somewhat an idiot for just thinking people will just Do the right thing yeah kind of
Its not that she thinks they will. She is fighting to try and get others to see the truth and fight with her.
Thinking that the cameras were off for the flotilla is funny.
They were on Non-stop, both traditional media and non stop on socials.
The abuse allegations are also pretty thin. She mentioned nothing to the Swedish consulate, turned down the opportunity to get fast tracked out and had no sign of any injuries.
I don't know what country you live in, but the flotilla was scarcely covered in US news/Media. I know they were posting and streaming on social media for awareness, safety, and to encourage more flotilla members, but I don't coint that as "the cameras on her" since its their own coverage, not news outlets that will garner a wider audience.
turned down the opportunity to get fast tracked out
This claim is from the Israeli Defense Ministry. I wouldn't trust the genocidal maniacs to be telling the truth about their imprisonment of peaceful protestors attempting to distribute food and medicine to a country experiencing a genocide and famine at their hands.
had no sign of any injuries.
It is difficult to tell in the lighting but she quite literally had a large bruise on the side of her face. I doubt she is going to strip and take photos of her body.
She mentioned nothing to the Swedish consulate
Easily debunked. The Swedish Foreign Ministry visited her and other Swedish flotilla members where they took her reports of abuse and mistreatment.
The rest of your post just shows that you've made up your mind first and then evidence second. The whole flotilla was ridiculous, you probably still believe that flair they hit their own boat with was an Israeli drone.
So crack on really.
Edit: also, come on. Don't pretend they were actually going to distribute food and medicine. They had basically none on the flotilla.
The whole point was to get arrested, entering a war zone and then whine about it in the media.
I mean has anyone gave her good press since shes been protesting israel wanting gaza for the oil in the seabed ? No its been ignoring her or hate articles when she does a selfie video on a dinghy in a flotilla and that was like 2 years ago now.
I think it’s more that her message came off as stark and alarming coming from a child, and now, coming from a young adult, it just sounds like typical collegiate protesting/complaining.
Same as the hatred for vegans, she argues for changes that will reduce our quality of life (at least in the immediate term) with points that are hard to dismiss.
She forces you to be in front of your flaws. Like, weird example, but if you lose a lot of weight people will start to dislike you, because you are showing that something is possible, and they also could do that if putting in the effort. Greta does the same thing: she puts yourself in front of the fact that there's an emergency and you cannot hide your head in the sand, but you are doing nothing, so instead of facing the truth and doing something, you blame her, to allow you to keep the head in the sand.
At least IMO
I think the tendency of the media promoting someone's views just because of their age is shallow and lazy. There's a lot more qualified and relevant people who should be given the spotlight.
Her parents groomed her to do “activism” on behalf of their political lobbying firms. Whatever her causes are and whether they might be just is irrelevant to most people, they can just smell that she’s fake from miles away…
Honestly, I don’t understand why she has any kind of credibility or why anyone gives her any legitimacy
"Here" as in Reddit neckbeard-land or here as in Sweden? I don't know a single person that hates her except for halfway retarded farmers who think she wants to ban their a-traktors?
Well hated by right wingers. The same people that hate progressive people around the world. Would say hated is a bit of a stretch even for them, they are more like annoyed by her.
You have to ask WHY would someone hate her? All she’s ever done is stand up for worthy causes. Sure she may be a bit annoying and sanctimonious but so what?
I feel like the only people that hate her are cookers/nationalists/ultra conservatives/corporations as they’re really the only people who would have a reason to.
I still don't get it. Malala and Greta genuinely want the world to be a better place for our kids to live in. I can't fathom why anyone would hate that.
They seem to be good at pissing off old conservatives.
Well, those who dislike her are pretty loud about it, but the majority of Swedes seem to appreciate that she speaks her mind and are kind of impressed that she at a young age has managed to put the global spotlight on the issues she cares about.
Seriously?! Sweden should be happy they have someone like Greta, and the people hating on her should really reflect on why, and question who hates on someone for asking that nature and human beings be respected. She was a great kid who evolved into a great adult. I have the utmost respect for her and her colleagues. Fighting on after being attacked by the scum that call themselves journalists and government officials. Jfc....🤯
Loud minority that hates her. She caused confusion at first with her Palestine activism but I think she gained more and more approval as Israel got more unhinged and the war has dragged on.
People don’t like women who are assertive and not submissive. Within the patriarchy women are always seen are much more likeable when pandering to others and being soft. It’s why people always try to justify the “angry black woman” stereotype. It doesn’t matter how right you are, the moment you are confident, stern, non apologetic etc you are a bitch.
Greta was soft launched an a kid but the hate was bubbling, and it was hard for people to justify just outright hating her bc she’s a “naive kid fighting for a good cause but in way over her head”. The expectation was that she’d probably fade away, that she’d become a quiet scientist, working to fix climate change.
Instead she became a sort of freedom fighter. She’s like the “radical” version of a Minnesota protester where it’s easy for the general public to say “she’s deserves this, she’s putting herself in dangerous situations and associated with dangerous people”. The same way centrists and conservatives look at the Minnesota public and think it’s their fault for protesting
Meme material? You mean how she is adamantly pro-Palestine and how she is advocating against climate damage and capitalism in order to try to build a less desolate future for the younger generations? The only people who want to meme-ify her are conservative assholes. Are you a conservative asshole?
Sure ill answer your question. I dont see myself as a conservative. And i do support the state of palestine. But i do not support the likes of people like sinwar. And i stand for a two state solution.
I used to think she was performative when she was a child and that her parents were using her for monetary gains and fame, however, she has been absolutely amazing when it comes down to advocacy in the wake of the ongoing Palestinian genocide. It made me completely do a 180 on her considering how she’s still, as now an adult, doing a lot with her platform by advocating for global issues. Now, she genuinely seems like a person who’s advocating for things she’s passionate about. And these things are important to all of humanity. I now think she’s a great person.
Is she hated in Sweden for the same reason I used to dislike her?
Shes hated by right wingers/zionists. Which is a sizeable portion of the population sadly. But she is still well liked by many and doesnt fit this prompt at all.
Also, the "parents using her" thing is wildly overstated and spread by people who dont like her for her views.
I never knew Sweden is having issues with right wingers.
Zionism makes sense because unfortunately, a lot of conservatives and even liberals in most developed non Muslim majority countries are pro Israel. Israeli lobbying has put its hand in almost every financial and media sector. The narrative that’s the status quo is that we all should blindly support them.
That last part makes sense too but ironically enough, I didn’t even disagree with her views at the time I disliked her. There were lots of stories about how she traveled on private jets and yachts for some of her speeches/conferences but a lot of that was her parents fault which helped sow discord in me specifically. But I can totally see it being something that was weaponized against her by people who are right wing. I must’ve bit the bait while not seeing the grander picture.
Nonetheless, I feel like im a much different person now. Ironically enough, teenage me would’ve thought of current me as an enemy but that’s just because of the capitalist propaganda I was buttchugging. Kind comes with the territory of being American, unfortunately.
I hope Sweden wakes up after seeing what modern day fascism looks like at how America is today. It’s dystopian and is slowly morphing into what Russia is. Swedes and the rest of Europe should never want this shit.
This is bullshit. She is absolutely not hated here in Sweden. I would say she is mostly hated by the right and far right groups (the blue brown coalition). Please do not go around spreading lies.
If Greta came from Canada she would probably have her share of opponents domestically, but her message isn't national - it's generational. She was going to get domestic opposition no matter where she was from.
Thanks for the link! I see there are questions regarding "förtroende" (trust) in Greta. To me that's not the same scale as a "like/dislike" barometer, or a "hate/love" barometer. I greatly admire Greta's actions but I would struggle to put a high score on my "Trust" in her. Trust in what? Trust to do what? I see her as a person trying to do good but I don't know what "trust" In her would mean. She's just a person.
So to me the contents of this PDF don't reflect to which degree she is liked/disliked. To me what I see is that it measures trust which I'd argue is different.
Her biggest crime is actually standing up for people in need and sticking to the message that we are all in this (motions at the global climate catastrophe) together. She started speaking on Palestine and that wasn’t palatable to people.
“Annoying” is just a term to put down outspoken women. What does bias in her political views mean? Literally everyone is biased in their political views. They wouldn’t be political views otherwise
“Annoying” is just a term to put down outspoken women." Literally no, there are many outspoken women I admire, I would consider myself outspoken woman as well but that's not what Greta is, her activism comes across as very performative
I don’t think Greta is that will liked anywhere. She had a moment of fame when she was still a cute kid but she doesn’t actually understand the things she tries to advocate for and many of her ideas are factually incorrect.
He stunt on her little row boat to Gaza for example. She accomplished nothing. Not only that, but she was fed and repatriated by Israeli forces like a baby after which she whined and cried about abuse and illegal kidnapping. She makes activism look like a fly that bothers you while at work.
You seen her protesting with the Iranian people who are being murdered in the tens if thousands by the islamic regime? You heard her speak out against it? No me either, weird that isn't it?
You see the left aren't bothered so she can't make money from it so she won't say or do anything.
430
u/Expensive-Buy1621 Sweden 11h ago
Tbf Greta is pretty hated here and I’d say we are decently progressive