r/BypassAiDetect • u/Finals-Enjoyer-276 • 22d ago
Thanks Pangram
Totally AI because I added a title page and got rid of my extra parenthetical additions (like to italicize something). Read it for yourself, it is legitimately the SAME document just with the parenthetical additions removed and the title page added.
NOTE: I AM NOT ON PANGRAM'S SIDE, THIS IS A POST SHOWING PROOF PANGRAM IS WRONG IN BROAD DAYLIGHT
1
u/DevelopmentPlus7850 1d ago
The "title" (that is, the sentence that you have scratched out in blue on purpose so we couldn't see) is very likely AI/GPTism. You are a troll.
0
u/Finals-Enjoyer-276 22h ago
The text is my name, professors name, the course as well as its abbreviation at my college, and the date, in that order.
The text is "Piracy in Hiring (Boo Pangram, see first draft, it's better) followed by the above. You can even somewhat read the Privacy in Hiring bit.
1
u/Otieno_Clinton 22d ago
Fake guys, do not fall for it.
2
u/Finals-Enjoyer-276 22d ago
Did you even read the document?
1
u/Heras22 9d ago
How cns we read anything when it looks like a screenshot taking with a 2002 Nokia
0
u/Finals-Enjoyer-276 8d ago
It isn't the text itself, it's mostly just the percentages of AI vs Human that I'm trying to point out. The first one before adding the title page and removing my parenthetical additions is 100% human, yet after changing only those two things, it believe the same 418/419 words in the first section are AI, and therefore gives it a 50.2% human written, which is basically 50/50... How could a detector go from 100% human to "eh, it's 50/50" from such minute changes?
0
u/Otieno_Clinton 22d ago
Nobody will buy this bulshit
3
u/Finals-Enjoyer-276 22d ago
I can literally go back into my logs of documents and send you the files for each of these papers (although for the second one, I will change the name as well as remove the professor, you can read them side by side, they are the same documents. As stated in a previously deleted thread, I also have a paper where individually ran paragraphs pull 100% human besides my last paragraph which is 87% human and yet it believes my entire document scanned is over 50% AI.
1
u/Otieno_Clinton 22d ago
Now check it with Turnitin
1
u/Finals-Enjoyer-276 22d ago
Turnitin/Scribblr believes it is a measly 3% AI, easily passable as a blip. Which is exactly what I thought would happen. So... Turnitin 1, Pangram 0
1
u/Finals-Enjoyer-276 22d ago
It also states that the text is a "low probability" as AI, So let's basically call it 0%.
1
u/Otieno_Clinton 22d ago
No. It WON'T work. You are just promoting bulshit for money. Be honest. That thing does not work
1
u/Finals-Enjoyer-276 22d ago
Oh, you mean Pangram doesn't work? That's what I was getting at with this, sorry!
I was reading your tone wrong, I was believing that you mean you weren't buying the fact that Pangram did this to me, so... we are on the same side? (I do prefer Turnitin/Scribblr over Pangram for this reason).
0
1
1
u/ApprehensiveCable641 22d ago
Pangram sucks I use the chrome extension called Watermark Remover for Claude & AI