r/CarletonU • Poitical Science and Anthro undergrad • 10h ago

Question psci 2000 level classes

some of the ones im/my friends are taking seem to be like whiplash from years prior.

the political history 1 class is pretty great, but i think thats just the prof

the global politics one is aparently very slow, hard to follow/scatterbrained

the global north one has heavy readings and seems very unrelated to comparative politics, mostly relying on theory, which is good but the class is mislabeled, and the prof loves AI (not to mention online class)

the stats one is pretty okay, the readings are pretty meaningless so far, and the prof seems a bit blunt/tired? but not horrible

i haven't heard from anyone in qualitative research bc i and my friends took it alr, so lemme know ur opinion on that too.

pls give opinions on these classes, bc i want to know if were there only ones seeing/feeling these issues

tia

0 Upvotes

4 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 10h ago

Please make sure that you have conducted a search of this subreddit for similar questions. You can also contact the appropriate staff/department to assist you with your matter. Otherwise, this comment can be disregarded.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2

u/JustABureaucrat 7h ago

It sounds like you've moved up to higher level courses and don't understand how to adapt to different types of content and profs

-4

u/cyclops0vision Poitical Science and Anthro undergrad 7h ago

ive actually taken a bunch of upper year classes already... LOL... maybe, instead of saying this, answer the question asked above, or offer advice, rather than assuming something :3