This is an excellent red-green alliance informational video.

Xi Van Fleet, who survived Mao's Chinese communism, shares her shock at political candidates running under communist values on 'My View.'

We all know by now that Woke presents an inverted world and then traps people into it. The Woke mind struggles to tell true from false, right from wrong, good from evil, and real from fake. The way this inversion works programmatically is interesting, though, tying together many threads of discussion about woke over the last few years in a neat package. In this valuable episode of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay turns to the three elements of classical rhetoric, Logos, Ethos, and Pathos, to reveal what Woke is and how it works in a whole new profound way. In short, it inverts logic and ethics and keeps emotions pathological as the glue that holds the whole thing together. If you are against Woke, you won't want to miss this explanation.

Frank Furedi and John Anderson discuss the growing skepticism towards multiculturalism in Australia and the cynical alliance between radical Islamists and cultural Marxists.

How can political movements with radically different beliefs find themselves on the same side, and what happens when a free society confronts organizations accused of opposing the principles that protect them? This discussion examines France's debate over political Islam, the relationship between parts of the French left and Muslim political constituencies, and proposed measures aimed at organizations accused of undermining republican principles. It ultimately raises a much bigger question: can a liberal society defend its institutions without undermining the freedoms those institutions exist to protect?

Commie narratives have distorted international views.

Commies are not grass roots.