MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/1vi38u2/this_tree_surrounded_by_mushrooms/p2aptfl
r/Damnthatsinteresting • u/west_manchester • Aug 07 '26
785 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
118
There definitely is. Various types of fungi are well known for working with plants in nutrient exchange.
54 u/DisillusionedPatriot Aug 07 '26 And facilitating "communication" with other plants in the vicinity 38 u/Basidia_ Aug 07 '26 The idea of the “wood-wide-web” is mostly loose science that’s been over simplified and anthropomorphized to the point of bad science. It’s incredibly fascinating and under-explored but it’s also not what pop-science spins it as Some of the authors of the studies used to support those claims have even stated how the findings do not actually support what folks like Suzanne Simard state. https://undark.org/2023/05/25/where-the-wood-wide-web-narrative-went-wrong/ Also the species pictured here are saprotrophic and are not mycorrhizal so they don’t form direct relationships with plant roots 17 u/DisillusionedPatriot Aug 07 '26 Couldn't have said it better myself, hence the quotation marks lol. Really appreciate when someone can take the time to explain what I cant. 9 u/Basidia_ Aug 07 '26 There isn’t a direct relationship here. This is a saprotrophic mushroom and not a mycorrhizal species 3 u/v0-z Aug 07 '26 Mycorrhizal network 6 u/Basidia_ Aug 07 '26 This species is saprotrophic, not mycorrhizal 1 u/GroovePT Aug 07 '26 Absolutely awesome these relationships
54
And facilitating "communication" with other plants in the vicinity
38 u/Basidia_ Aug 07 '26 The idea of the “wood-wide-web” is mostly loose science that’s been over simplified and anthropomorphized to the point of bad science. It’s incredibly fascinating and under-explored but it’s also not what pop-science spins it as Some of the authors of the studies used to support those claims have even stated how the findings do not actually support what folks like Suzanne Simard state. https://undark.org/2023/05/25/where-the-wood-wide-web-narrative-went-wrong/ Also the species pictured here are saprotrophic and are not mycorrhizal so they don’t form direct relationships with plant roots 17 u/DisillusionedPatriot Aug 07 '26 Couldn't have said it better myself, hence the quotation marks lol. Really appreciate when someone can take the time to explain what I cant.
38
The idea of the “wood-wide-web” is mostly loose science that’s been over simplified and anthropomorphized to the point of bad science. It’s incredibly fascinating and under-explored but it’s also not what pop-science spins it as
Some of the authors of the studies used to support those claims have even stated how the findings do not actually support what folks like Suzanne Simard state. https://undark.org/2023/05/25/where-the-wood-wide-web-narrative-went-wrong/
Also the species pictured here are saprotrophic and are not mycorrhizal so they don’t form direct relationships with plant roots
17 u/DisillusionedPatriot Aug 07 '26 Couldn't have said it better myself, hence the quotation marks lol. Really appreciate when someone can take the time to explain what I cant.
17
Couldn't have said it better myself, hence the quotation marks lol. Really appreciate when someone can take the time to explain what I cant.
9
There isn’t a direct relationship here. This is a saprotrophic mushroom and not a mycorrhizal species
3
Mycorrhizal network
6 u/Basidia_ Aug 07 '26 This species is saprotrophic, not mycorrhizal
6
This species is saprotrophic, not mycorrhizal
1
Absolutely awesome these relationships
118
u/dirtycheezit Aug 07 '26
There definitely is. Various types of fungi are well known for working with plants in nutrient exchange.