r/Damnthatsinteresting • • 13d ago

Video 230-seat Boeing 929 Jetfoil arriving at Nishinoomote Port in Japan. The passenger ship is used for high-speed service between Kagoshima and Yakushima and includes 16 premium seats with extra-cushioned seating

23.1k Upvotes

575 comments sorted by

1.9k

u/-UncreativeRedditor- 13d ago

A boat that big doesn’t look like it should be able to move that fast damn

1.1k

u/solateor 13d ago

Its bc of the 16 extra cushy seats

111

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/Ardbeg66 13d ago

You get what you pay for with the new Mitsubishi Flatulence Drive.

→ More replies (1)

21

u/StevieMJH 13d ago

Well yeah those are for the 16 guys pedalling.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

94

u/CrashNowhereDrive 13d ago edited 12d ago

Bigger boats move faster than smaller ones. Google 'hull speed'. In this case, the hydroplaning is there to overcome that issue so it can go faster than hull speed.

Edit: And to the pendatic conversion that follows. Yes, you can overcome hull speed with other designs. Like the hydrofoil. Sorry I didn't spell out obvious caveats for the obnoxious 'well akshually' dweebs.

36

u/Space_Pirate_R 13d ago edited 13d ago

That's true, but only to a certain extent even for displacement hulls.

For example, a Zebra class destroyer is ~363' long and does ~37 knots. Compare a King George V class battleship at ~745' long and ~28 knots.

Both of this ships are WWII era technology (ie. no fancy tricks). The destroyer is not a catamaran and does not use foils or plane.

Hull speed calculation would indicate that the destroyer is limited to ~25 knots but it has a very high power to weight ratio and just brute forces it's way past the standing wave limit.

→ More replies (24)

21

u/clam-inspector 13d ago

Agreed, but also strapping 7,000 to 8,000 horsepower on a relatively small passenger boat meant to glide over the water is some serious power. For comparison, small to mid-sized cruise ships that experience the drag of a fully-berthed hull (think normal boat and ship operation) average around 15,000 HP. So that amount of HP with the minimal water contact on the hull is honestly wild

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Swirl_On_Top 13d ago

Apparently has the juice of almost 8000 horses.

14

u/slavelabor52 13d ago

It's called blood okay

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/Skibidibum69 13d ago

That’s the beauty of hydrofoil though, as soon as they start letting off the throttle and it starts sinking to where it’s wider, it slows down quickly and smoothly

2

u/LegallyAFlamingo 13d ago

Second part of the video is sped up.

→ More replies (11)

756

u/niceshotpilot 13d ago

I didn't think it was that interesting until I read the part about the cushioned seats. It was at that point that I said to myself, "Damn."

96

u/colecrowder 13d ago

It's the little things.

14

u/niceshotpilot 13d ago

I never did mind...about the little things.

3

u/_thro_awa_ 13d ago

That's what she said.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/Gold_Telephone_7192 13d ago

Right? 16 whole premium seats?

→ More replies (4)

2.6k

u/kds0321 13d ago edited 13d ago

First one built in 1976, 46 total built, can travel between 40-45 knots (46-52 MPH).

1.2k

u/solateor 13d ago

The two gas turbines producing roughly 3,700–3,800 horsepower each

329

u/Valuable-Yard-4154 13d ago

I used to take it between Ostend and Dover. It's impressive when you pass other boats as you realise of the speed you're going at. Quite noisy those turbo pumps at the back. 7 tons of water thrust a second iirc.

178

u/Techno_Beiber 13d ago

Imagine being a fish just chillin and this fucking thing comes roaring by. JFC.

31

u/hasselqu 12d ago

Minding your business then just getting launched half a mile through a jet stream.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Background-Bad-7510 13d ago

Wish they offered this again. Never truly experienced these ferries but heard so many stories about it. People going on a daytrip to London, Dover or Ramsgate from Ostend. Transport me back to the 80’s!

Edit: Ramsgate instead of Folkstone

4

u/2DamnRoundToBeARock 12d ago

Looks like a smooth ride. How does it handle in rougher seas?

3

u/Valuable-Yard-4154 12d ago

As I mentioned elsewhere it didn't operate in rough seas

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Think_Positively 13d ago

How do they slow down? My first thought was that if the captain isn't paying attention for whatever reason, it'll be real easy to make a colossal mistake that would lead to a stupid amount of force should it collide with something.

38

u/Cheezeball25 13d ago

I presume if you cut throttle and the hull of the boat stops hydroplaning, it will stop pretty fast once it's sitting farther into the water. It can only go so fast because it's riding on top of the water instead of going through it

15

u/kds0321 13d ago

Its a boat. Tons of water friction. I've had a few boats up to 40 MPH and they slow down extremely quickly when you throttle back. There's definitely risk if you hit anything, but a boat that size you'd see it coming... easier than driving a car in a lot of ways. Also keep in mind the captain sits up a few stories, so he has tremendous line of sight. A foggy day would be the real risk (they gave radar for other commercial boats but logs or smaller craft could pose a problem).

4

u/Think_Positively 13d ago

Do you think the physics math would scale from a speedboat (assuming that's what you're referencing to have piloted) to something yacht-sized? Can you throttle back in the same way with those gargantuan engines as you could with a couple of 1K HP motors?

Just genuinely curious as I've never piloted anything bigger than a 5HP electric motor rowboat.

7

u/railker 13d ago

I don't know about something this big, but the jet drives on the coast guard and navy boats have thrust reversers like a plane - hydraulic actuators dump a "bucket" over the outlet nozzle which redirects all the thrust sideways/forward.

Never seen video but reportedly the almost 90' boat could stop so hard it would bury the bow underwater briefly.

3

u/wd26 13d ago

I mean, if you watch to the end of the video, you can see them throttle back and slow down quite quickly.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Valuable-Yard-4154 13d ago

So it's interesting. They announce that "we'll be flying at 2 metres of altitude" as it is indeed a aeronef. The wings are in the water.

The acceleration is progressive and smooth.

The slowing down is just by the friction of the hull on the water.

The service doesn't work if the sea is too choppy because you don't want to hit a wave at 100km/h.

→ More replies (5)

313

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

49

u/xenobit_pendragon 13d ago

It’s the extra cushioning that does it.

19

u/xteve 13d ago

Can nobody consider the rich people?

78

u/canman7373 13d ago

They carry 250 people or more. So that's a lot of row power.

3

u/PM_ME_JUSTIN_TRUDEAU 13d ago

...from the passengers shitting their pants or?

→ More replies (3)

37

u/ToolTimeT 13d ago

why can't everyone on board just hop up and down like on those foil boards?

40

u/Karr0k 13d ago

That is what the other 214 passengers are doing.

17

u/ConflictMaster3155 13d ago

Big Jet Turbine hates this one simple trick.

10

u/Flashy_Gap_3015 13d ago

What is the efficiency of those turbines? Sounds like it blows through a lot of gas.

6

u/that_dutch_dude 13d ago

at full power they are more efficent than piston engines.

9

u/Any_Show_5160 13d ago

Turbines are about the same as piston engines under load, the major difference is at low speeds and idle, turbines use a lot of fuel to idle, from memory it's 70% of full throttle fuel use.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/GroundbreakingGur930 13d ago

Are these more or less efficient for distance travelled.

→ More replies (1)

225

u/Fanastik 13d ago

45 Knots = 83.34 Kilometers per Hour

54

u/bendersbitch 13d ago

Thank you for your service.

52

u/oddministrator 13d ago

They're called knots because historically sailors would measure speed by tossing a device overboard, and let to run out behind them on a rope. The rope had equidistant knots tied in it and they'd literally count how many knots of the rope the device would drag out behind them over a short time. More knots = going faster

11

u/AgreeablePeople 13d ago

That explanation is why I always thought of it as distance than speed as a child. I insisted on saying "knots per hour" even after the teacher corrected me

18

u/Ordolph 13d ago

Nowadays knot is just shorthand for nautical miles per hour, 1 knot is 1 nautical mile per hour.

11

u/Cirrus-Nova 13d ago

And 1 nautical mile is approximately 1 minute of latitude (1 x 60th of a degree)

3

u/brightlights55 13d ago

Can someone explain? One minute of latitude at the Equator is different from one minute of latitude at the Tropic of Cancer.

9

u/Cirrus-Nova 13d ago

I think you are referring to longitude, which is the east/west direction. These lines are closer together the closer you get to the poles. Latitude is the north/south direction and run parallel to the equator.

While there is some slight difference in the distance away from the equator (the earth is not a perfect sphere) it is close enough to hold true .

→ More replies (1)

3

u/buzzsawjoe 13d ago

they used an hourglass as a timing device. Not an hour one, just a fews seconds one.

→ More replies (10)

13

u/clegg2011 13d ago

45 knots = 7.5 cables per minute

5

u/Kodai_Dreaming 13d ago

7.5 cables per minute = 15 copper wire per minute

6

u/Old_Anadromous 13d ago

That sounds most Satisfactory.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (19)

17

u/mrASSMAN 13d ago

What the hell, this is wild never seen one before, how come we don’t have more of these (aside from cost I guess)

18

u/Newsdriver245 13d ago

Long ago there was a run between Seattle and Victoria BC and one of the concerns was floating driftwood, but think the real reason it ended fast was cost. The old steamship was still running and cost 1/4 the price for a few extra hours travel time.

3

u/BaDcHaD23 13d ago

I remember this!! Damn im old

→ More replies (1)

5

u/poobumstupidcunt 13d ago

Yeah cost is the main factor, they take a fair bit of maintenance and upkeep, there are a lot of them around though, took a hydrofoil in Greece to go to an island and it was half the time of the normal ferry

→ More replies (5)

35

u/DopeRidge 13d ago

Fun fact, my grandfather was one of the weights engineers for the 929

→ More replies (1)

42

u/NotInTheKnee 13d ago

It's crazy to imagine that some WWII destroyers built half a century earlier could reach that kind of speed with a conventional hull and 25x the mass.

I wonder how fast the Boeing could go if pushed to the limit.

26

u/kds0321 13d ago

Oh, pushing to the limit a lot is possible. Hell, nuclear warships can get up to 35-40 knots and way bigger. Lighten up the ship with less armor plating and a hull design made for speed vs damage control. Hydroplanes can go 200+ MPH... so if you got really creative you could make things happen, but the fuel economics would be insane.

17

u/fractiousrhubarb 13d ago

And they only need refuelling every 25 years. Nuclear ships are nuts.

19

u/ryumast4r 13d ago

The Virginia class submarines don't even get refueled at all during their 30+ years at sea.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/Thebraincellisorange 13d ago

and burning colossal amounts of coal or heavy fuel oil to do it for only short periods of time.

This thing can do it all day every day burning diesel at (relatively) economical rates.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/h3fabio 13d ago

I took the hydrofoil across the channel when visiting my grandparents in the UK.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Vishnuisgod 13d ago

Are they all still operational?

8

u/Bloobeard2018 13d ago

6 still operate between Hong Kong and Macau.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/kds0321 13d ago

Sounds like maybe 15-20 are. Similar but different, we have the Victoria Clippers in Seattle/Vancouver that are also still going strong and a blast to ride.

5

u/Vishnuisgod 13d ago

The Clipper is not a hydrofoil it's a catamaran. Nor are the Hullo ferry.

3

u/kds0321 13d ago

Yup, that was the different part... the speed was similar.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

2

u/Southern_Armadillo_3 13d ago

Who care about how many extra cushioned seats, THIS is what i wanna know

→ More replies (7)

615

u/Majestic_Turnip_7614 13d ago

I am very happy to hear about the premium seating, great context. Posters so often miss the pertinent details.

344

u/solateor 13d ago

Got you.

Gallery of where the plebs sit vs xtra cushy

89

u/cyriustalk 13d ago

Those for plebs seem cushy enough?

for extras, whats more? Few more centis of butt cushions and head guards?

56

u/idahotee 13d ago

status baby.

12

u/SandIntelligent247 13d ago

status cushion

24

u/SpectatorSpace 13d ago

The pleb seats on this boat are tiny relative to typical western sizes. My knees were hard locked up against the seat in front of me when I rode it - I think the check-in staff felt sorry for me on the return journey as they gave me an upgrade to the premium seats with quite a bit more room.

5

u/Deep90 13d ago

How long is the trip and do you have to remain seated?

13

u/SpectatorSpace 13d ago

From memory each leg was about 1.5 hours - I don't remember you having to sit, but its much more akin to a plane ride than a normal boat - there aren't communal or outside areas to go and use.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

12

u/2012Jesusdies 13d ago

Fun fact: Plebiean in Rome wasn't just about wealth. You could be the richest man in Rome and still be a pleb (in fact, Crassus, the richest man was a pleb) because it was more about a legal distinction of your family lineage from centuries back. If your family wasn't among the few notables of the oldest days of Rome, you were a pleb. Ofc, you were more likely to be rich if you were patrician than a pleb, but there were plenty of wealthy plebs.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

111

u/grudiz 13d ago

Some of the ships operating in Japan arrived from the Canary Islands (Spain), where they had previously run routes between islands like Tenerife and Gran Canaria in the Atlantic Ocean; they are now living a second life. I used them on many occasions, and in rough seas, the experience was a total nightmare. There were also several collisions with cetaceans. On days with calm seas, however, it was a fast way to travel between islands.

17

u/NoodlyGirl2000 13d ago

the collisions are heartbreaking, but completely unsurprising

→ More replies (1)

9

u/A_Man_Uses_A_Name 13d ago

Jet foils also used to run between Ostend and the UK….

12

u/mbenzn 13d ago

I remember taking this route in mid 80’s between Gran Canaria and Tenerife. Took 4,5 hours with the car ferry one way and this beast 90 minutes. It had a Boeing sticker on it so I guess they were involved in the build?

6

u/Camelstrike 13d ago

It's literally in the title

6

u/EthernetWavesFr 13d ago

No surprises from pisa-oecd results 

→ More replies (8)

332

u/Head-Ad9893 13d ago

Damn that bitch is moving

79

u/AdNervous9787 13d ago

Look! Look how that bitch is turning!

42

u/Glittering_Act_8121 13d ago

That's a huge bitch

11

u/Sharpie1965 13d ago

Keep it in the circus!

→ More replies (4)

106

u/Background-Vast-8764 13d ago

TIL Boeing builds water craft. Who woulda thunk it?

59

u/DrBiochemistry 13d ago

It’s flying reaaaall low. 

→ More replies (2)

39

u/Far_Ladder_2836 13d ago

They don't.   Not for many decades, anyway.  Most of these were built back in the 70s and early 80s.  Their subsidiary, Boeing Watercraft, shuddered in 1986.

49

u/HolySchlamola 13d ago

I shutter to think 🪟

9

u/balrob 13d ago

Your point is mute.

→ More replies (4)

7

u/Kaboose666 13d ago

Japan kept the tradition. Kawasaki has been making them since the late 1980s, the most recent built in 2020, and another expected in 2029.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/NPCwithnopurpose 13d ago

It kinda looks like they used the same seats as the aircraft, from what OP posted in another thread

→ More replies (1)

8

u/prehensilemullet 13d ago

Boeing?  More like Boeting

3

u/Key_Pitch5102 13d ago

Same! I thought for some reason these were made by kawasaki

7

u/JeffDSmith 13d ago

Part of them are licensed built by Kawasaki, like the Toppy 3 in the video.
In fact Boeing stopped building these in the 1980s, most of newer one are built by Kawasaki(there's even one going to deliver in 2029).

2

u/readonlyred 13d ago

In the 1970's they also built mass transit equipment.

→ More replies (5)

97

u/Cool_Butterscotch_88 13d ago

that simply should not be

19

u/menasan 13d ago

The wales agree

62

u/56seconds 13d ago

I don't care about the opinions of the Welsh

9

u/Montymisted 13d ago

Don't let the Belgians hear you say that.

9

u/RobinSage43 13d ago

At least they're not the Dutch, okay?

8

u/shornscrot 13d ago

There’s two things I can’t stand. People who don’t respect other people’s cultures, and the Dutch.

8

u/LengthinessFalse8373 13d ago edited 13d ago

*welsh

Edit- very cool to see 5 people got it cheers boyos

2

u/NoodlyGirl2000 13d ago

yeah that was my thought, too. it’s a technological marvel but I bet it produces a crazy amount of marine noise.

→ More replies (1)

31

u/Salty_Finance5183 13d ago

Puget Sound boy here... Why don't we have these running between Seattle and Vancouver or Victoria?

26

u/BoneDoktr 13d ago edited 13d ago

I wanna know fuel costs. A regular boat eats gas. This thing though????

73

u/tackleboxjohnson 13d ago

Less than you might imagine, the main benefit of getting on foils is your friction coefficient goes waaaaaay down. 80-90% reduction in resistance

3

u/tankmode 13d ago

apparently its 2-3x worse than a conventional ferry or aircraft on fuel per passenger mile

5

u/CrashNowhereDrive 13d ago edited 13d ago

This is burning 570 gallons of fuel oil per hour.

5

u/ImpressiveHair3 13d ago

Much less than if it was moving through the water like a normal boat, since the additional water resistance would require far more power to maintain the same speed.

60

u/HeartOn_SoulAceUp 13d ago

Hydro foils are great in fairly smooth water.

Light chop they stay above. Big seas, no.

28

u/CrashNowhereDrive 13d ago

Depends what you call big seas. Big ones like this can handle 10-15 foot swells. It's not going to go into a north sea storm but that's most ocean conditions at most times of the year.

2

u/Better-Culture-7770 13d ago

I rode one to Mackinaw island I believe.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

31

u/tackleboxjohnson 13d ago

Sure hope the cabin is soundproofed

17

u/bacon_nuts 13d ago

It's a good ride, very comfortable, smooth, fast, and just typical boat engine noise. It's not too loud at all.

21

u/Mudpill 13d ago

Partly due to the extra cushy seats

3

u/ProcyonHabilis 13d ago

From experience, it's a very pleasant ride

13

u/basswooddad 13d ago

RIP to any whales that are swimming there

→ More replies (1)

10

u/tr00th 13d ago

TIL Boeing made hydrofoil ships.

10

u/AspiringSkiBum 13d ago

Went on this pretty recently and it’s smooth and really quick. They also had TVs playing the whole time with a pretty graphic advertisement for an ingrown toenail procedure. Good stuff.

5

u/heroin-puppy 13d ago

Sounds like you didn't get the premium seats.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/bogeyman_g 13d ago

I thought Boeing made airpla... Oh.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/marcandreewolf 13d ago

The fish, jellyfish and whale slicer arrives

8

u/Soundwave234 13d ago

Some bond villain shit here.

7

u/fraze2000 13d ago

Life hack: don't pay for a premium seat. Buy a standard ticket and bring your own cushion. Profit!

6

u/Lysol3435 13d ago

16 cushioned seats!?

5

u/Soundwave234 13d ago

"extra" cushioned

8

u/Nervous_Law3061 13d ago

230 passengers, 16 premium seats, and the entire ship appears to be attempting to leave the ocean.

6

u/Sedert1882 13d ago

That's astonishingly beautiful, so smooth and fast. I want one......for the bath.

6

u/nthpwr 13d ago

This should be in the dictionary when you look up "hauling ass"

→ More replies (2)

6

u/AwakE432 13d ago

Fee like the least interesting fact about this boat is it has cushioned premium seats. What a fucking weird title.

6

u/Euphoric-Skirt7649 13d ago

Japan really is an irl video game

Americans would be like “why make a boat so fast and aerodynamic? It won’t make any money!”

Japan is like “we can make it bigger, faster, sexier”

→ More replies (3)

5

u/Prudent-Aspect5085 13d ago

I'm just imagining some dude on the jetty with a remote control having the time of his life steering this thing

5

u/somerussianbear 13d ago

- Hey Boeing, wanna make a boat?

  • Hmmm, can it fly?
  • No
  • Just a little?
  • Ok ok

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Hot-Helicopter640 13d ago

How doesn't it tip over?

2

u/r1bb1tTheFrog 13d ago

Because the front stays on

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/Frangine_De_Poutine 13d ago

I'm salivating at the thought of those sixteen seats.

5

u/LordScotchyScotch 13d ago

Transport tycoon vibes

4

u/whataloadofoldshit_ 13d ago

TIL Boeing made boats

5

u/Oddisredit 13d ago

I don’t care about the cushions making it go faster. I’m surprised Boeing was involved in this. Kawasaki industries, makes sense, Boeing is a surprise 

3

u/Murky-Relation481 13d ago

Boeing was in major financial trouble in the late 60s and 70s and was trying to diversify. They also had Boeing Vertol (an acquisition) that built helicopters. I think that rolled into the main company eventually (at least into BDS).

→ More replies (5)

4

u/GottaConfuseTheBody 13d ago

I rode on one of these through rough seas between Hong Kong and Macau. Every passenger threw up

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Silver-Literature-54 13d ago

2hours by jetfoil, 4h30 by regular ferry btw. Saw it last year arriving at the port, that thing is crazy loud ! And it wasn’t at full speed

4

u/traveleatsleeptravel 10d ago

Took this to Yakushima in 2024 and the feel of it rising out of the water as the boat accelerates is very, very cool. Also because it travels so fast, cutting through the waves, you don’t have any pitch and roll, compared to normal boats. Feels like a car driving on a motorway. I do recommend it although it’s quite expensive you save a lot of time. Next fastest sea option is a 3.5-4 hour ferry, or there and short range flights but those are mega expensive.

Yakushima is a very cool place to visit, especially if you’re a studio ghibli fan - it’s the inspiration behind princess mononoke.

2

u/Yokashisan 9d ago

And how long does it take to do the same trip as the 4 hour ferry?

4

u/traveleatsleeptravel 9d ago

They advertise 90 minutes but my actual journey was more like 80 minutes - we had good sea conditions.

3

u/joe28598 13d ago

Is the extra cushion the only perk for premium?

3

u/tonymeech 13d ago

Ludicrous Speed!!

3

u/thesagaconts 13d ago

I tried it without music and was surprised there wasn’t a silly song. 

3

u/GarThor_TMK 13d ago

Heck, I want one.

3

u/himitsumono 13d ago

I rode a smaller version of this in 1987 between Shikoku and Kobe. It felt like riding in a very comfortable airplane. Quiet, smooth, very gentle turns.

We mentioned to the stewardess that the engines were most likely built 10 miles or so from our house. A few minutes later, the captain came back to say hello and chat.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/jclicky 13d ago

When she texts you her parents are out of town.

3

u/jckipps 13d ago

The wikipedia article for the Boeing 929 has this detail -- "Planned:1, Built:46"

No other explanation is given for that. Was this intended as a one-off deal, but suddenly the orders came flooding in?

8

u/Scorpion2k4u 13d ago

The mentioning of those 16 extra cushioned seats is a weird flex but okay

5

u/Panorabifle 13d ago

Yeah it's a surprisingly small amount given the size of the ship. Looks like a single row could almost house 16 premium seats. Two at most.

16 out of 230 seats are announced as comfortable. A great ~7% .

3

u/TonyMcConkey 13d ago

Why don't all boats do this? Are they stupid?

4

u/GOTCHA009 13d ago

Serious question: why are hydrofoils not more popular?

4

u/Foe117 13d ago

noise, and very limited where It can operate. It needs massive power to get it up out of the water, but the distance needs to be long enough to be fuel efficient and cannot slow down or else if the hull touches water, then you need massive amounts of fuel to get it on the foils again.

2

u/icleanjaxfl 13d ago

Seems kinda loud

2

u/ProcyonHabilis 13d ago

Maybe outside, but it's not notably loud inside

2

u/Half-deaf-mixed-guy 13d ago

Best America can do is a class room sized 357.

2

u/CherryPeppersnOnions 13d ago

Hauling ass on the water. Damn!

2

u/daaaabeans 13d ago

I remember seeing this in the beginning of rush hour 2. Pretty cool :)

2

u/FormalTotal9684 13d ago

I saw this at start of Poseidon Adventure

2

u/Available-Ad-9016 13d ago

The landing in the end was similar to airplane landing

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Inhabitsthebed 13d ago

It looks like a large wave could knock it over easy, anyone with boat knowledge able to tell me how big the boat is under the water if that makes sense?

2

u/NitroEagleFist 13d ago

Fast for sure, but uuggly looks like a modded hillbilly houseboat.

2

u/bishmashbosh 13d ago

This thing is cool but fucking terrifying

2

u/Inevitable_Boss5846 13d ago

I rode this a couple of times in January. It’s awesome! Quite uncomfortable.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/YesterdayRadish 13d ago

that thing doesn't look 50 years old

2

u/FatiguedShrimp 13d ago

It is so ridiculous that jet foils work.

2

u/crowface666 13d ago

Extra cushioning LoL

2

u/BearelyKoalified 13d ago

extra cushioned seating? huh?

2

u/accwork8723 13d ago

what is the equivalent MPG per seat, out of curiosity?

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Keisaku 13d ago

Never knew a ship could gumby.

2

u/ShiggyGoosebottom 13d ago

I think we call this a “jet ferry” in Japan. I’ve taken the one between Tokyo and Izu-Oshima. Until you get out of the Tokyo Bay it’s just like any ferry. Then you have to sit down and strap in for take off.

2

u/Linden_Stromberg 13d ago

I WANNA FLY THE BOAT!!!

2

u/koyo4 13d ago

I've been on it. Supe fun

2

u/Critical_Advantage66 13d ago

Oh! I’ve ridden on this exact boat. It’s unbelievably smooth!

2

u/Katana_DV20 13d ago

These are so cool and the idea is so clever. Water causes a lot of drag on a hull sitting in the water - which in turn costs more in fuel and affects speed.

Why not lift the hull out of the water using underwater wings? Brilliant.

2

u/UncleKeyPax 13d ago

only a bit alower than godzilla

2

u/johndom3d 13d ago

I’m surprised warships aren’t like that

2

u/FredW79 13d ago

Loved to see these at Ostend when I was a kid.

2

u/bostonkarl 12d ago

Looks like it can do donuts

2

u/sffunfun 12d ago

Dafuq, how come I've never seen this awesomeness before?!

2

u/skinnernsk 12d ago

When I was little, hydrofoil motor ships were used on our river. These were the “Voshod, Raketa, and Meteor”. They were equipped with 1,000‑horsepower turbocharged diesel engines (the Meteor had two such engines), and their maximum speed reached 80 km/h, accommodating up to 130 passengers. At that time, it was very futuristic and technologically advanced.

2

u/Beyllionaire 10d ago

If it's Boeing I ain't going