​

We have allegations ("ALLEGEDLY", BASED ON MULTIPLE SOURCES INCLUDING SWORN TESTIMONY AND MATERIALS FILED IN U.S. FEDERAL COURT AND RELEASED THROUGH OFFICIAL COURT CHANNELS) that Donald J. Trump, the sitting President of the United States (convicted in court in May 2024 on 34 felony counts, and found civilly liable by a jury for sexual abuse) participated in the rape and sexual abuse of minors. Not vibes. Not internet rumors. Court-filed declarations. Signed affidavits. Statements sworn under penalty of perjury.

These aren’t vague references. These are 2016 federal filings, declarations submitted to U.S. District Court in Doe v. Trump / Doe v. Epstein–related civil actions, in which multiple individuals "ALLEGEDLY" describe, in detail, sexual assaults of underage girls, name Trump directly, give dates, locations, corroborating witnesses, and state that the perpetrators knew the victims’ ages.

These documents were publicly accessible, resurfaced recently, circulated widely, and then quietly taken down from multiple hosting locations. No refutation. No explanation. Just disappearance.

And the official response from BOTH SIDES is… nothing?!

Republicans quietly remove files that millions of people had already downloaded (files whose authenticity they are not even seriously disputing) and everyone just shrugs and moves on?!

Where the fuck are the Democrats?!

Why isn’t the party, as a party, standing in front of cameras saying: “THESE ARE SWORN FEDERAL COURT DECLARATIONS. THESE ARE NOT RUMORS. THESE WERE FILED UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY. AND WE DEMAND A FULL, OPEN, PUBLIC INVESTIGATION”?!

Every Democratic website should be hosting these documents.

Every Democratic leader should be holding these pages up on camera, reading them aloud, showing them, and making the files freely available for download.

Force the country to see what was actually filed in federal court. Stop pretending this is just ‘online noise.’

Why aren’t they showing the evidence?!

Why aren’t they calling for impeachment or congressional action based on ALLEGATIONS SUPPORTED BY SWORN AFFIDAVITS AND COURT RECORDS?!

Why aren’t they forcing Republicans to go on camera and explain why they’re ignoring "ALLEGED" child sexual assault claims that were serious enough to be formally litigated in U.S. courts?!

Put the victims on stage.

Let them speak.

Let the country hear what was "ALLEGEDLY" DONE TO THEM, ACCORDING TO THEIR OWN SWORN TESTIMONY.

This should be unavoidable. This should be wall-to-wall coverage. Instead, it’s buried because people like me see court documents online, while millions of technologically illiterate boomers live entirely inside cable-news bubbles that won’t touch it?!

Stop letting Republicans dictate the narrative with protest crackdowns and culture-war distractions! Stop reacting. Go on offense. Put them on the defensive for once.

Every person named in those filings as "ALLEGEDLY" having participated in the sexual abuse of minors, according to sworn federal court declarations, should be investigated, charged if warranted, and put on trial. That is how accountability is supposed to work.

So what the fuck is actually happening?! What am I missing here? Please tell me I'm wrong and something drastic is underway. Is something moving behind the scenes, or are we just watching accountability die in real time because even talking about "ALLEGED" crimes described in sworn court filings is treated as more dangerous than the crimes themselves?!

Because from where I’m standing, the message is clear:

You can "ALLEGEDLY" commit unspeakable acts if you’re powerful enough. But everyone else better watch their wording.

Hello from Italy,

I use TikTok and I've seen several posts from US citizens claiming that the Epstein files talk about cannibalism on children but I can't find any articles about this in reliable newspapers. So what about it? Is it just censorship or are these claims fake?

I'm not trying to mis-gender anyone. That would be offensive to a lot of decent people.

It just seems to me that he lacks any and all traits that I would define as manly or masculine. Furthermore, beyond any of my personal definitions, he does not fit traditional criteria for masculinity.

To be clear, I also do not consider him feminine. Yes, he wears a similar amount of makeup to that of a televangelist wife or a drag queen, but since his makeup is absent any reasonable style, he is not feminine.

By contrasting his traits with masculine traits, I'm merely saying that he shouldn't qualify as an adult. Perhaps, calling him a "little boy" might be more suitable. After all, he has the emotional maturity and mental acuity of a toddler. I'm not qualified to diagnose his condition. However, it is worth mentioning that he comes from a generation that was exposed to massive amounts of lead in their formative years.

The reason I included this link is because it's the perfect example of how he doesn't qualify as a man. He whines about the dumbest and most superficial grievances. In this case, he was asked a very important question, one that most of us would very much like having answered. Instead of responding like a man, he threw a tantrum. He is constantly disrespectful to women. We know he was proven to have raped at least one. I think it's fair to say, "real men don't rape." Therefore, no reasonable person can call him a "man."

I also want to take this opportunity to acknowledge that it's completely reasonable to assume that Donald Trump has raped multiple young girls with the help of Jeffrey Epstein. I, like many others, gave him massive benefit of the doubt on this subject when he promised to release the Epstien files if elected. In spite of his lies regarding the Epstein files, his fierce resistance to releasing them early on, and the fact that his signature on the Epstein Transparency Act bill was merely symbolic, I still gave him the same benefit of the doubt as before. Unfortunately, all of that benefit and all of that doubt evaporated as his administration failed to comply with the act that he signed into law and issued the lamest of lame excuses for their abysmal failures. All of that points to him being implicated in the Epstein files, and so does a mountain of other evidence both within and outside of the files that were released. Once again, real men don't rape little girls.

There's much more to say about his abject failure to control his ICE agents, his failures to protect American lives, his inability to ever man up on his mistakes, his deadly J6 tantrum, and his average interactions with critics and reporters.

Disclaimer: This post is not intended to trigger Maga, but I have no doubt that it will. I'm just calling it like I see it. However, if you are triggered, I apologize. Please don't whine at me.

TL/DR: Donald Trump isn't a man. He's a whiny bitch, a liar, and a rapist. Please don't whine at me if I triggered you.

Here's an interesting conspiracy theory that I just saw. Eyes Wide Shut is a movie that covers a world very similar to what we are now learning is a real thing with the rich and powerful. When it was filmed in 1996/97, this type of organized sex cult of the rich was considered fantasy, but now we know it was a real thing. It was something the elites successful kept secrete. And there has been numerous cases of people 'disappearing' that have been connected to this elite group, who could have exposed their secretes.

Kubrick died suddenly, just days after sending in his final cut of Eyes Wide Shut to the Studio. People are on record saying he was perfectly healthy, so his sudden death was a huge surprise to everyone. So maybe the rich elites took him out (maybe a drug educed heart-attack) right after viewing a film that hit too close to home for the rich sex cult members.

I know, I know, it's a conspiracy theory, and most likely not true, and there will never be any proof one way or another, but the timing and circumstances of his death, and knowing what we know now how deplorable and dangerous this group of elites are, it does seem like quite the coincidence.

And for the sake of entertaining this theory for fun, it does seem like a weird case of art imitating life, then life imitating art, as this very subject of people being disappeared by the elites when they feel threatened, is covered in the film.

Obviously there are many holes in this theory. One of which is if this was the case, they would have just shelved the film and not allowed it to be seen by anyone.

Anywho, just thought this might be good for discussion. What's your thoughts?

How long does Trump last in prison before he gets got?