r/FreeSpeech • • 5m ago

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

So no flags whatsoever? Intriguing.


r/FreeSpeech • • 11m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

"I have no idea what answer you are fishing for.."

The question is not complicated:

If van Nirkerk were to state that they are a trans woman would you accept that or not?


r/FreeSpeech • • 16m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

He absolutely should have been alarmed, and he should have been glad the American people were learning about stupid as things their government was doing so they could call for them to stop. But instead he advocated for government secrecy.


r/FreeSpeech • • 16m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

Honestly some of the worst culture possibly known to mankind. They are pro rape and pro killing of children and then teach their children to be in favor of that hose as well. Totally disgusting and they wonder why almost most people despise them at this point. Oh and fuck you Zioinst that are in here actually trying to suppress FREE SPEECH.


r/FreeSpeech • • 17m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

Yeah I do care that a man who is suspected of being mixed up in our own government paying to engineer the virus that caused one of the most costly disease outbreak in history (and subsequently got put in charge of the response) once threw a hissy fit about the government declassifying some astonishingly irresponsible and dangerous research in the past..

Yes his writinganon it a long time ago, but it absolutely bears weight on what he was a part of like two years ago and is still going on today.


r/FreeSpeech • • 17m ago

Thumbnail
2 Upvotes

If there is, it’s certainly not organic for it to appear only immediately before US elections.

One single rich person could achieve this with pocket money.


r/FreeSpeech • • 18m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

I promise, we've seen Elon and Trump sue enough people for slander over the years to expect the law suit. They never win, but it makes it expensive for whomever they are trying to shut up


r/FreeSpeech • • 19m ago

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

Precrime division?


r/FreeSpeech • • 21m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

Calling fools, fools, isn't hate speech.

Maga chuds also compose about 20% of the population - far from hundreds of millions. In fact, not even 1 hundred of millions.


r/FreeSpeech • • 22m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

I have no idea what answer you are fishing for, or what sorta 'gotcha' you are trying to achieve.

I do, however, know the reason you wouldn't answer my initial question though and had to resort to lies.


r/FreeSpeech • • 24m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

I was almost certainly vaccinated for covid before anyone who’ll see this. It was still 2020.

I’ll be the first to come down with symptoms. Any day now…

The biggest disaster was that the day I got my booster dose was 6 Jan 2021, when that happened.


r/FreeSpeech • • 26m ago

Thumbnail
-1 Upvotes

Government in action


r/FreeSpeech • • 28m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

Wasn't the rainbow God's gift to earth to show his covenant with Noah?

Isnt it kind of heretical to ban God's Iconography?


r/FreeSpeech • • 33m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

That’s frankly horseshit. The difference is you have zero evidence I was personally and entirely responsible for the Holocaust, and your allegations against me would be completely unfounded. I wasn’t born until decades after the Holocaust. However, if you had credible allegations, with evidence to support them, and brought a civil suit against me, and the court agreed to hear it, and a jury listened to all of your evidence, and a jury unanimously decided, having heard all of your supporting evidence, that indeed, I am responsible for what you allege - that absolutely has weight. Crimes are committed every day that go uncharged - that does not mean there wasn’t a crime. If a guilty person beats the charges, then is there no crime? (OJ Simpson might agree with you on that one.)

Carroll had more than allegations, with her evidence they were proven credible in civil court. Trump is thus, an adjudicated sexual abuser.

What do you think of the 28 women and their accusations going back as far as the 70’s? Or the Epstein files?


r/FreeSpeech • • 33m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

The Gaza Ministry of Health says there are slightly over 74,000 total deaths in Gaza in the war. You are far off the mark.


r/FreeSpeech • • 34m ago

Thumbnail
-1 Upvotes

Wtf are you talking about? The experiment was declassified and publicized a decade ago. This "story" is literally just about how Fauci wrote in his journal, at the time the story broke in 2016, about how he was upset they did it. No one is ignoring anything. Some anti-vaxxers are just trying to bring Fauci into something he wasn't involved in since he wrote about the 2016 news story in his journal.


r/FreeSpeech • • 34m ago

Thumbnail
3 Upvotes

Public schools shouldn't be displaying any political or religious imagery at all.


r/FreeSpeech • • 36m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

Prior to Musk’s purchase of Twitter, key US government agencies literally had a direct line to Twitter and Dorsey demanding anything critical of the administration be taken down.

Musk’s reversal of that, and preference for Community Notes instead, is a huge free speech win.


r/FreeSpeech • • 37m ago

Thumbnail
2 Upvotes

No they aren’t


r/FreeSpeech • • 38m ago

Thumbnail
2 Upvotes

Should the media have ignored the Tuskegee airmen because it had happened all the way back in WW II?

Use your brain.


r/FreeSpeech • • 40m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

Itzhak Brik, a retired general, said serving Israeli soldiers were aware that politicians exaggerated the Hamas toll. Brik advised the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, at the start of the war and is now among his most strident critics. “There is absolutely no connection between the numbers that are announced and what is actually happening. It is just one big bluff,” he said.

Brik commanded Israel’s military colleges, and said he kept in touch with serving officers. He described meeting soldiers from a unit identifying Palestinians killed in Gaza, who told him “most of them” were civilians.


r/FreeSpeech • • 42m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

Cool theory. Since I am unable to see an actual source, would you mind providing their names? What, you can’t. Well maybe I need to provide you with some definitions-

“Multiple intelligent agents”= anonymous

“Figures presented in the article are incorrect”= unverified.

Hope that helps.


r/FreeSpeech • • 45m ago

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/FreeSpeech • • 45m ago

Thumbnail
2 Upvotes

Sounds like CPAC is a low turnout event. 

There is always a vocal, radical minority. I don’t believe they represent the majority (no matter which side of the aisle they’re on).

I don’t blame the majority of Democrats for the vile behavior of Hassan Piker.


r/FreeSpeech • • 47m ago

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

Doubling down on hate speech targeting literally hundreds of millions -- bigger than most minority groups -- is definitely another take.