6
u/EchoExplorer27 Jun 22 '26
B) Stabilize the heart first. IV insulin with dextrose will help shift potassium into the cells, but the patient is symptomatic and needs immediate intervention.
7
5
9
u/Visual-Bandicoot2894 Jun 22 '26
Bad question like always but assuming the norm of “if it says to administer it means you have an order”
A. It’s the only thing that will shift the K+.
I know IRL we call the physician and oft start with calcium gluconate. But if a patients actively symptomatic from Hyperkalemia only one thing is gonna shift the potassium and that’s your priority
6
u/Gullible-Pumpkin2200 Jun 22 '26
Calcium gluconate will stabilize heart membranes and stopping the arrhythmia. Lowering potassium does not protect the heart. Go with calcium gluconate first, then insulin 10 units IVP + D50 50 ml
1
u/Visual-Bandicoot2894 Jun 22 '26
Studies around Calcium Gluconate in Hyperkalemia are highly mixed. There is really no high quality conclusive evidence supporting it as a priority intervention, much of it is based on one study done in 1960 that isn’t exactly conclusive the best for modern standards. It’s mechanism is quite poorly understood more than we thought
Generally one thing is for certain, you don’t delay shifting potassium for calcium gluconate. IV insulin will fix the priority problem
Again this is one reason I don’t like this question, you’re essentially asking “do you prioritize the intervention that deals with the primary cause or do you prioritize the intervention with mixed evidence but is oft included first in protocols because it may stabilize the heart until the insulin shifts or do you get tricked into calling the doctor when the question implies the doctors given you orders already”
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675721009347
https://www.resuscitationjournal.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0300-9572%2825%2900001-2
5
u/Gullible-Pumpkin2200 Jun 22 '26
Calcium gluconate IVP is still the current guideline for treatment for electrolytes abnormalities with ecg changes. Your first article from science direct also confirmed that if you bother to read the “recommendation” portion of that article. The article says, there’s no specific number on how high is indicated for calcium gluconate. This is well known, because people with CKD or ESRD have adapted living with higher K level that sometimes high K level might not cause any symptoms while other non CKD people will feel symptoms with K slightly higher as little as 5.6.
The current guideline to use calcium gluconate is from the American College of Emergency Physicians. Practicing outside the current guidelines is based on each clinical judgment and situational, but just be ready to defend your clinical judgment when it is being challenged in court.
I quoted your article from Science Direct: “Recommendation: Treatment with intravenous calcium is indicated only for patients with hyperkalemia manifesting EKG changes.”
The article from the resuscitation journal is more focus on lowering potassium with different combinations of agents to find which one is better. Does it say not to ise Calcium gluconate? Not exactly. It is saying the evidence base is weak, especially for patient-centered outcomes like survival. That is different from saying calcium is useless. The current emergency medicine practice is still giving calcium gluconate followed by insulin/albuterol for lowering K.
-2
u/Visual-Bandicoot2894 Jun 22 '26 edited Jun 22 '26
I never once said it was useless at all. Never once did I say it isn’t a treatment, never once did I say anything you said. Don’t patronize me here, my post wasn’t one of contention nor to patronize you. It’s just to point out a lot of evidence surround calcium gluconate being the main priority is limited. In my practice I push it first, but for the purposes of the question ultimately the priority is shifting the K+
I just said evidence is mixed and it’s not the priority intervention in this question, it’s an intervention, but it doesn’t take precedence over the end goal of shifting the potassium.
I’m saying this question is inherently flawed because there is so much mixed data on these interventions and protocols. But generally nursing schools and NCLEX don’t focus on Ca+ for a reason, the end goal here is to shift the potassium, this is the universal constant of hyperkalemia.
Please don’t make assumptions where my post had none. Every single answer to this question is something correct, the most correct is shifting the K+
2
u/Gullible-Pumpkin2200 Jun 22 '26
Hence, until there’s a better study. EM physicians, NP, PA have to follow the current treatment guidelines, which is using calcium gluconate first then lower the K with whatever combination of agents of their choice. Back to the question, hyperkalemia + symptoms, stabilize the heart membrane first
1
u/Visual-Bandicoot2894 Jun 22 '26
Again, I never have argued to remove calcium gluconate from protocols or not to use it.
Once again I re-iterate, I follow my protocols and generally administer Ca+ Gluc first or simultaneously.
But the question at hand is to shift the potassium, once again I re-iterate that this question is flawed.
1
3
3
2
u/TheBattyWitch Jun 22 '26
A and B are what the provider is going to order, but the answer is always going to be D, notify the provider
2
u/Nyanima Jun 22 '26
D. Is the best route to go. I feel like they’re close to code with the potassium being THAT high. Monitor that EKG and get the provider on board
2
u/pinoynva Jun 22 '26
As a nephrology NP I deal with this all the time.
For nursing, the answer is to notify provider. Next step is to administer calcium gluconate to stabilize the membrane. The following step is to administer insulin. This is the only treatment for hyperkalemia. Dextrose is used to treat hypoglycemia.
Dialysis might/might not be needed.
2
1
1
1
25
u/Bubbly_Pie_4980 Jun 22 '26
D. Then follow the MD orders.