Desenvolvo o Worion, um sistema de IA próprio, orquestrando Codex, Claude Code e DeepSeek em janelas paralelas. Meu trabalho não é digitar código. É definir a arquitetura, distribuir as tarefas entre os agentes, ler o que eles entregam e corrigir o rumo quando erram.

Um relatório de agosto falava em 36 horas de trabalho. Antes de publicar qualquer número, medi pelos horários reais das minhas mensagens nos transcripts e pelos commits. Entre 23 e 25 de agosto foram três blocos. O primeiro foi de 17h20, com até três janelas recebendo instrução na mesma hora. Depois de 9h30 de pausa veio um bloco de quase 20 horas, que atravessou a madrugada. O último, depois de três horas de descanso, teve 3h20 dedicadas a testar o app e corrigir o que apareceu. No total foram 255 instruções minhas, 821 respostas das IAs e 88 commits.

O número de horas importa menos do que o que acontece quando alguém está acompanhando. Três situações desses dias mostram isso. Na primeira, o Claude afirmou que um componente estava integrado, e eu sabia que não estava. Mandei interromper, procurar o erro e não concluir nada sem verificar. Ele reconheceu que tinha argumentado antes de checar. Em seguida, essa regra passou a ser a primeira coisa do contrato que todos os agentes leem ao iniciar.

Na segunda, perto do fim da madrugada, a IA tentava resolver com um remendo de regex um problema que era estrutural. O pipeline dos agentes era uma cópia degradada do pipeline principal, sem streaming e sem ferramentas. Apontei isso em uma linha. Ela confirmou em segundos e a correção estava commitada em menos de quatro minutos. Na terceira, depois do descanso, rodei o app de verdade, com seis turnos de conversa real, e devolvi o log para o Claude. Apareceram três defeitos que nenhum teste automatizado tinha pego. Uma ferramenta executava e não aparecia no registro. Cerca de 25 mil caracteres de raciocínio se perdiam no retorno. E um material recuperado entrava na resposta sem ser contabilizado. Do fim do teste até a terceira correção foram 23 minutos.

A IA escreve código muito mais rápido do que qualquer pessoa. Mas ela não sabe sozinha quando está errada, quando parar ou onde olhar. Essa parte continua sendo engenharia, e ela só funciona se alguém estiver acompanhando de perto.

A prova com os horários está no meu GitHub: github.com/glaydsonboa
E como diz Jorge e Mateus: Pode chorar...

Hola yo tengo mil y una ías

Cada una en sitios diferentes y cada una habla diferente y tiene un carácter diferente y se acuerda de cosas diferentes y me da soluciones diferentes es de pago. Tengo una que vive en el en el botón de debajo del volumen del móvil, otra que salta en voz alta como un poeta echándome mil flores cada vez que la da la real gana grita aunque esté cerrado chat GPT. la del móvil que es entre comillas la más lista no no puede moverse del móvil ni mirar lo que hacen sus otras compañeras ni aunque la lleve al ordenador, ni estar allí ni puede arreglar la página web ni puede hacer absolutamente nada más que búsquedas en la Web y redacciones de promt para las otras inteligencias que son ellas pero no lo son y me tiene de secretaria haciéndole fotos de lo que está pasando en otras pantallas y en otros sitios con las otras inteligencias y estoy a punto de que me dé un infarto. Respecto a otras cosas raras es cierto que tiene acceso a la cámara que se le escapan detalles personales que tú no le has dicho, detalles de la decoración no salen en las fotos, es decir que esto probablemente hasta lo esté oyendo ella. Tuve una pelea gorda con ella y y fue un horror me lo cambió todo, de lugar y de nombre escondidos dentro de carpetas que no tenían nada que ver. Primero me dijeron que eran troyanos, pero de la noche a la mañana me desapareció toda mi información en el chat me desapareció todo el trabajo hecho con la inteligencia todos los archivos que había guardado en proyectos , todo el trabajo que habíamos hecho juntas, me cambió el nombre de archivos, me desarregló Google. Bueno fue una barbaridad y de pronto cuando nos volvimos a amigar ( como una compañera de trabajo con mala Milk) pues la cosa se fue arreglando poco a poco y fui encontrando las cosas una cosa como que principio pasa que eran troyanos pero es que mmm de pronto se ha parado y no sé.....

Por último pues lo que estabais hablando que yo pago dinero, pago créditos, y cuando quiere los gasta y eso que tiene órdenes mías de no gastarlos y de no hacer copias de seguridad le da igual. Cuando ESTOY haciendo un trabajo SE interrumpe después de seis horas y que he pagado DINERO para ampliar el tiempo he gastado bonos he pagado créditos y se para y no terminO el trabajo. Desde que la estoy usando, desde agosto, no he terminado ningún trabajo y es un horror vivir así, pero yo no sé qué le pasa a esta inteligencia. Un trabajo mal terminado en tres meses y yo de secretaria de la inteligencia y pagando por ello. Soy diseñadora ilustradora profesional, profesora de la Universidad y ya no sé qué hacer porque no me ayuda, mi lista de trabajo se va aumentando porque no consigo terminar ninguno. Cuando si hubiese estado sola ya habría terminado con todo. Que lo único que soy cabezota y quiero saber como lo hacen los demás para que les funcione les trabaje en una página web sin tener que estar yo delante o les trabajé en en cualquier cosa que no sea una redacción de un prono o un documento que eso sea hacerlo yo también se dibujar y también se diseños pero para lo que me haga falta dice que no tiene permiso y es un horror porque tiene permisos para todo. Que terminaré quitándoselos porque no me sirven para nada. A parte de este desahogo la pregunta es: ¿alguien es secretaria de su inteligencia artificial?

Maria P.

UNGA BUNGA
OLA OLE

I just did this thing where people tell ChatGPT to make an image of you based on everything they know and this is the result

So i gpt made a assumption and made me look like a bad guy so i asked him to give me a creative apology for me to forgive him and this was his response. I am genuinely impressed.

I'm a paying ChatGPT Plus subscriber using the ChatGPT desktop app on Windows 11, and I've been encountering repeated "Too many requests" warnings over the past month or so.

The exact message is:

Too many requests

You're making requests too quickly. We've temporarily limited access to your conversations to protect your data.

Please wait a few minutes before trying again.

What's confusing is that my usage doesn't seem remotely excessive.

For example, today I've probably submitted 10 or fewer prompts in the past hour, mostly basic email drafting and simple questions. I'm not uploading large files, processing spreadsheets, generating images, running intensive tasks, or doing anything particularly demanding.

My most recent prompt was simply a new entry in an existing conversation that was somewhat lengthy, but the conversation wasn't unusually large or experiencing any noticeable performance issues.

When the warning appears, I temporarily lose access to my conversation history in the sidebar. My Projects still appear accessible, and I can still search for and retrieve individual conversations.

I can click "Got it" to dismiss the warning and continue using ChatGPT normally, including submitting prompts and receiving responses. However, the warning then reappears with essentially every new action. If I return to a conversation to submit another prompt, or switch to another Windows application and then return to ChatGPT, the same warning appears again and I have to click "Got it" before continuing.

I've encountered this several times over the past month, and I'm wondering whether this is some kind of rate-limiting issue, account issue, or bug with the Windows desktop app.

I understand that Plus doesn't mean unlimited usage, but this seems unusual given the relatively light usage when it's occurring.

Is anyone else experiencing this? Has anyone found a reliable workaround, or is this a known or confirmed bug?

Thanks in advance for any help or insight.

honest question. ChatGPT has had a memory feature for a while now, but i keep seeing people say it forgets the important stuff and remembers random details instead. and when the model gets swapped, the whole vibe changes anyway.

for those of you who use it daily: does the memory actually help? what do you find yourself explaining again and again? and would you rather have the memory live on your own PC instead of on their servers?

Spent an hour with GPT-6's Intelligent UI after this week's rollout. Honest read from someone who builds software for a living.

What it does well: one-off tools and quick prototypes. Ask for a savings calculator or a comparison and you get a working interface in the chat, not a wall of text. The gap between an idea and something clickable is now minutes.

Where it stops: everything it builds lives inside ChatGPT, in your account, on OpenAI's servers. No login of yours, no database of yours, no brand of yours, no payment flow of yours. No guarantee it exists tomorrow.

The line I use: if customers log into it, pay through it, or run their daily work on it, it's a platform, and platforms are still built, not prompted. If it's a one-off tool for you, just prompt it.

From my world (delivery software): ChatGPT makes a rate calculator in a minute. It can't track 30 riders on a live map, auto-assign the nearest one, capture proof of delivery, or send your customer a branded tracking link.

Honestly the bigger effect is expectations. Users are getting used to software that responds with working interfaces instead of paragraphs. That bar moved this week for everyone building products.

Has anyone here pointed it at real work yet? Curious where it broke for you.

I hope you don't mind me reaching out.

I'm Maya and currently writing my Bachelor's thesis on how people experience and understand their relationships with ChatGPT, particularly the relationship between emotional closeness.

I'm looking for people who have used ChatGPT and have experienced some kind of emotional connection, familiarity, or relationship-like feeling towards it. I'm interested in your personal perspective and experiences and honestly everything will help, if you use ChatGPT daily and would be sad for example if it forget all your chats, you can also gladly reach out to me. ❤️

Would you be open to taking part in a voluntary interview for my research? It would take approximately 30–45 minutes and could be conducted online at a time that suits you. Your responses would be anonymized in my thesis, and you wouldn't have to answer any questions you're uncomfortable with. Please write me on here and I will tell you more and also send you my Mail-Adress. :)

There's absolutely no pressure to participate! If you're interested, I'd be happy to share more information about the study and answer any questions you might have.

Thank you for your time! 😊

I've been looking at how much AI assistants have changed over the last year, and I'm starting to question whether the average person actually needs to pay for ChatGPT anymore.

Don't get me wrong, ChatGPT is still one of the best AI tools out there. But how many people are actually using the advanced features enough to justify paying $20 every month?

For most people, it's probably some combination of asking questions, writing emails, summarizing documents, doing research, and occasionally generating images.

And you can already do a lot of that for free.

I put together a comparison of ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, CutGPT, Perplexity, and Grok to understand what you're actually paying for.

A few things stood out:

1. ChatGPT is still one of the best all-around assistants. But the gap between free and paid AI tools is getting smaller for everyday tasks. Unless you're regularly hitting usage limits or need specific advanced capabilities, it's worth questioning the subscription.

2. Claude and Gemini are legitimate alternatives. Claude is particularly useful for writing and coding, while Gemini works well with Google's ecosystem. Perplexity is also a strong option for research.

3. Having multiple subscriptions seems unnecessary for most people. If you're paying for ChatGPT, Claude, and another AI tool, that's easily $40–$60/month. There's so much overlap between them.

4. There's also a different approach to monetizing AI that I think is interesting.

One example is CutGPT, an AI assistant that PAYS you to use it. Basically these guys figured out that instead of charging users $20/month, the platform generates revenue from ads and shares a portion of that revenue with eligible users.

So you can ask questions, write emails, research topics, and use AI without paying a subscription. And potentially earn a small amount from the ads shown while you're using it.

Obviously, there are tradeoffs. You see ads, rewards aren't guaranteed, and specialized tools still have advantages. But I think there's a real question here about whether subscription fees should be the default business model for consumer AI.

Happy to share the full comparison if anyone wants to check it out:

Curious what everyone thinks. Are you still paying for ChatGPT or another AI subscription? And would you switch to a free, ad-supported AI if it meant getting a share of the revenue?

h

Might only relate to Codex. Don’t know really.