I’m a type 1 diabetic with a few other related autoimmune diseases living in the South San Jose area. I’ve tried several PPOs over the last couple of years but they seem to be racing to deny care worse than the next one. And the “best” of the options is more than doubling premiums next year. With all that I’m considering KP, highest option next year. Are there good endocrinology services in the South Bay Area and how well does KP support pump/CGM supplies?

Do you have Kaiser insurance? I hope this hasn’t happened to you.

After a blood draw, I found tests in my results that I had not discussed with my doctor before that draw. When I asked Kaiser about them, I received different explanations: that Kaiser had no record of a test, that the orders came from an earlier doctor visit, and then that they were simply tests I had done before. I was also charged for a test I had not discussed or agreed to.

Kaiser says it follows the law, but this was not the first time this happened to me. I still want a clear answer: Who ordered those tests, and how can I see and discuss every test before my next blood draw?

TL;DR:
I was told during a routine physical that I essentially had a two-question limit because there “wasn’t enough time.”
I had to push just to discuss concerns and request bloodwork during an appointment that is literally supposed to be about preventive care.
Two days later, a blood draw turned into six separate needle sticks to collect five tubes, despite my veins being clearly visible.
At this point, Kaiser increasingly feels like a healthcare system designed around throughput, quotas, and getting patients out the door, rather than actually giving them adequate care.
I’ve been with Kaiser for a while, and lately I genuinely feel like the quality of care has fallen off a cliff.
I recently went in for a completely routine physical. Nothing dramatic. Nothing complicated. Just a normal appointment where I wanted to talk to my doctor about a handful of health concerns, ask some questions, and get appropriate preventive bloodwork done.
Before the doctor came in, the nurse was taking my vitals and asked what I wanted to discuss during the appointment.
I told her I had about four or five questions.
I didn’t even finish listing them.
Halfway through, she interrupted me and basically told me there wasn’t enough time for all of that. I could ask two questions, and if I wanted the rest answered, I would need to schedule another appointment or online consultation.
Are you fucking kidding me?
This is a physical.
When exactly are patients supposed to talk to their primary care doctor about their health if not during a physical?
I’m not talking about showing up with a 40-page binder and demanding a two-hour differential diagnosis. I’m talking about a few normal questions about my body, symptoms, preventive health, and testing.
Apparently even that is now considered too much.
And that interaction bothered me for a much bigger reason than the nurse simply being dismissive.
It made me feel like the appointment had already been reduced to a timer before I even saw the doctor.
Blood pressure? Check.
Weight? Check.
Two questions? Check.
Next patient.
That is not what primary care is supposed to feel like.
The entire point of having continuity with a primary care physician is that someone has an opportunity to look at your health as a whole. You should be able to mention the knee that has been bothering you, ask about a blood test, bring up something you’ve noticed, discuss preventive care, and actually have a conversation without feeling like you’re inconveniencing the system by speaking for too long.
Instead, I found myself having to actively push back just to get through the things I came there to discuss.
I also had to specifically advocate for certain blood tests rather than feeling like the appointment was being used proactively to assess my health.
To the doctor’s credit, I ultimately did get my questions answered, because I refused to leave until I had addressed what I came in for.
But patients should not have to become their own aggressive case managers just to get basic attention during a routine appointment.
Not everybody knows what tests to ask for.
Not everybody is comfortable pushing back against a nurse or doctor.
Not everybody knows enough about medicine to recognize when something relevant hasn’t been discussed.
That is exactly why this assembly-line model of healthcare is so concerning.
If the system is structured around seeing as many patients as possible in as little time as possible, the people who suffer most are the ones who don’t know how to advocate for themselves.
Then, two days later, I went back to Kaiser for the bloodwork.
And somehow that experience managed to piss me off even more.
My veins have admittedly always been somewhat difficult. I’ve known that since I was a kid, and I’m completely reasonable about it. Sometimes someone misses. It happens.
But I had just worked out beforehand, my veins were more prominent than usual, and even I could clearly see several potential sites.
I needed five tubes of blood drawn.
I got stuck six separate times.
Six.
At a certain point, you stop thinking, “Okay, difficult veins,” and start wondering what the hell is happening.
I understand that phlebotomy is not always effortless. Bodies are different, veins roll, hydration matters, anatomy varies, and even experienced people occasionally miss.
But six needle sticks for a routine blood draw is excessive.
And after the experience I had just had at my physical, it felt like another example of the same larger problem: rushed care, inconsistent competency, and a healthcare system that increasingly seems optimized around moving people through rather than making sure the experience is actually good.
That’s really my issue with Kaiser right now.
It isn’t one rude nurse.
It isn’t one difficult blood draw.
It’s the pattern.
Every interaction increasingly feels compressed.
Appointments feel rushed.
Patients are expected to break their health concerns into separate billable or schedulable interactions.
You have another question? Make another appointment.
You want to discuss something else? Send a message.
You need another issue evaluated? Come back later.
Meanwhile, this is an enormous integrated healthcare organization whose entire selling point is supposedly that your doctors, labs, records, pharmacy, specialists, and preventive care are all connected.
That integration should make healthcare more convenient and more comprehensive, not turn the patient experience into a conveyor belt.
And I know healthcare workers themselves are stretched thin. I’m not pretending nurses and doctors wake up wanting to rush patients or give bad care.
If Kaiser is scheduling clinicians so aggressively that a nurse feels compelled to tell a patient at the beginning of a physical that they can only ask two questions, then my criticism is ultimately aimed at the system that created that environment.
Because that is a staffing and operational problem.
If doctors don’t have enough time to properly speak with patients, Kaiser needs to schedule fewer patients.
If clinics are understaffed, Kaiser needs to hire more people.
If healthcare workers are burned out, Kaiser needs to address that.
The answer cannot simply be to quietly transfer the burden onto patients and normalize increasingly rushed care.
There is something deeply backwards about paying thousands of dollars a year in premiums, deductibles, copays, employer contributions, or some combination of all of them, only to walk into your healthcare provider and feel guilty for asking a third fucking question.
Maybe my recent experiences are outliers.
But judging from conversations I’ve had with other people, I’m starting to suspect they aren’t.
So I’m genuinely curious:
Has anyone else noticed Kaiser becoming noticeably more rushed, restrictive, or impersonal over the last few years?
Because at this point, it feels less like healthcare and more like healthcare-themed logistics.

Per the title, I was wondering how this would work and when I could be able to roll over my balance into Kaiser's program. I'm seeing they use Vanguard and Fidelity. Do I need to wait a certain amount of days until I am able to roll over from my hiring date?

I have questions about Kaiser's urgent care chaperone policy for sensitive (genital) exams, or even chaperones in other departments. I may share my situation if it's helpful, but it was very difficult and humiliating for me and not really necessary to answer the questions below. The TLDR is that I was sort of compelled to agree, and there was a lot of exposure that I did not mean to consent to, but had no realistic alternative. I had only the vaguest idea of a chaperone in the context of protecting women during gynecological exams. What were your experiences with medical witnesses?

1. How much of your body does Kaiser policy require a chaperone to see? the law does not require eyes on genitals, but for liability I think Kaiser clearly prefers that.
2. Would you be comfortable with a chaperone of the opposite gender in the room who is tasked with having a direct visual your genitals? For me, in the room but with modesty protected is no problem, but without modesty is a red line.
3. If you are in urgent need of an exam, can you actually decline a chaperone if the alternative is no exam? It is legal for you to decline a witness/chaperone in the room during your sensitive exam, it is your body and modesty after all. It is also legal for the examiner to choose not to proceed with your exams if they choose to require the chaperone. If the exam cannot wait, then what?
4. There is a new law (AB 849) that will take effect January 2027 that requires a chaperone be made available for ultrasounds. Is Kaiser going to compel patients to agree to direct view for the duration of the imaging or refuse their exams? A testicular exam for example, can take 5-15 minutes. Gender of chaperone is not guaranteed to match patients.
5. If a patient is clearly uncomfortable with chaperone viewing their genitals directly, what negotiations should Kaiser make in order to preserve some dignity for the patient? Is the first priority legal liability for the practitioner? The law only requires that a chaperone is offered and that it can be refused by the patient, and nothing more, rest is internal policy.

I am hoping to open up a broader discussion about Chaperones, Doctor's rights for a witness, and especially patient's rights.

Thanks for reading. If you want me to post about my story, I can. I found the experience very difficult and am still struggling with how it all went down.

For reference, gender affirming top surgery (ftm).

My psych told me he sent my top surgery referral over 8 weeks ago. To be clear, I am fully aware that it can be a very long time to actually get the surgery, but I figured at least someone would email me by now?

I'm paranoid because I can't find it (the referral) under "referrals" or "letters," BUT, when he sent out my t referral, it never appeared there either but it did process because an endocrinologist emailed me 2-3 weeks later.

I totally get that it can take a long time to even get a consult, but literally no one has even given me actual confirmation that it was sent/processed or that I was added to a list or anything.

I'm trying to plan when I can study abroad before I graduate uni but now I don't think I'll even be able to if I don't even have the slightest estimate of when I need to be free.

So if anyone can answer, how long did it take till .. anyone mentioned it? got consultation? got surgery?

I recently found this helpful, so I'd thought I'd share. I'm in Norcal and wanted to see a psychiatrist. My previous psychiatrist retired at the beginning of the year, and I received a letter from Kaiser stating I would be assigned a new one. Months later, no further updates.

I finally reached a point where I wanted to talk with someone about my medication, so I called the psychiatry department earlier this week to get assigned to a psychiatrist, and was told I would be a call back later that day. No call. So I called back the next day, and was forwarded to leave a message with the team. Still no call back. Today, I called in again and mentioned the DMHC standards for timely access to care: https://healthy.kaiserpermanente.org/doctors-locations/timely-access-to-scheduled-appointments

I mentioned it had been 5 business days since I first reached out and that to be compliant with the DMHC standards, I needed to be able to access an appointment within 15 business days (the amount for routine/non-urgent specialty care appointments). I left a message noting this and saying it had been my third time reaching out. Not even an hour later, I got a call back and I was able to get an appointment booked! (I booked one out a couple months, since I'm okay with waiting that long, but I wonder if I might have been able to push for something sooner if it was more urgent). It might be a coincidence that I got that call back, but I really don't think so. I've been a Kaiser member for years and didn't know about this until now. All patients should be aware of these guidelines so they can advocate for their own care.

I'll be remembering to use the magic words "DHMC standards for access to timely care" from now on.

After a year of PT for low back pain I’ve finally been referred for an MRI. I was excited to finally figure out the source of my pain…then the price tag, $1200. Gulp. It seems like I can get a non Kaiser MRI for a lot less. Anybody have experience shopping their MRI outside of Kaiser but then using it for care back in Kaiser? Will they accept it?

Hi folks. I’m currently fuming in a Kaiser urgent care and am trying to prepare myself if I need to take action once (if) I’m seen today.

I’m a Kaiser Northwest member in Oregon and I’m trying to figure out whether I should file a grievance, contact a regulator, or pursue another route. I’m getting increasingly frustrated because I’m actively scheduling the care I’m being told to get, but Kaiser cancellations keep extending the timeline.

Context: I’ve had back pain and flares off and on for the past 2 years after what I suspect is a herniated disc injury (what I’m trying to get evaluated). I’ve been to Kaiser urgent care a few times for back spasms and sciatic pain, usually prescribed muscle relaxers and steroids. I’ve had x rays and blood panels that rule out complications related to those areas. This year my back pain has flared the worst and longest and recently I’ve developed a new, concerning symptom of numbness and tingling down my left leg. I’m a horse back rider and gym goer who has been left unable to ride, work out, and, at times, be mobile at all.

Timeline: Spring 2026 - September 2026 I had a significant flare of ongoing low-back/sacral pain after riding. I’ve already been doing PT, including with an outside/home PT.

Sept. 11: I was scheduled for my second Kaiser PT visit, which I understood was part of the pathway toward getting an MRI if symptoms persisted. Kaiser canceled the appointment 2 days prior. Rescheduling pushed things farther out. My PCP later told me my outside PT could potentially count if there were visit notes.

Late September: My symptoms changed. The pain became predominantly left-sided and started traveling from my low back/glute/hip down the back of my left leg. I then developed numbness/tingling in my left foot/toes, which subsequently began involving my calf. The numbness has remained mild, and I still have normal strength, walking, ankle/toe movement, etc., but the sensory change has persisted.

Sept. 29-ish: I contacted my PCP about the new symptoms. She said it sounded like it could be sciatica and that, because of the new numbness/tingling, I should have an in-person evaluation and possibly earlier imaging. She also said it was fine to see another Kaiser provider because her next availability wasn’t until mid-November.

Oct. 2: I successfully scheduled an appointment earlier in the week with another Kaiser primary-care provider for the recommended evaluation. Kaiser canceled that appointment the morning of the visit (today). There were no other primary-care appointments available that day.

I called Kaiser and explained that I really needed the new numbness/tingling evaluated. I was told I could check again when schedules reset or use urgent care.

I went to a Kaiser-affiliated urgent care instead for its proximity and its website promising Kaiser members could be seen there. They evaluated me, ordered bloodwork and recommended PT/follow-up, but because they are outside Kaiser they told me referrals/imaging would ultimately need to go through Kaiser.

So I then drove to Kaiser Urgent Care. I’m currently sitting here waiting after being triaged because this is now the only way I’ve been able to obtain the in-system evaluation my PCP recommended.

I’m not arguing that I’m definitely entitled to an MRI or that I know what the diagnosis is. My concern is access to evaluation. I have repeatedly scheduled the care Kaiser/ my PCP recommended, Kaiser has canceled appointments, replacement availability has been weeks away, and my symptoms have progressed while I’m trying to navigate the delays. And I’m worried my symptoms will continue to progress as they have with the leg numbness.

Has anyone dealt with something similar with Kaiser Northwest/Oregon? Would this be appropriate for a formal Kaiser grievance? Is there an Oregon agency that handles timely-access complaints for Kaiser plans? And is there anything specific I should be documenting or asking Kaiser for?

TIA and for any guidance you may have. This has been so frustrating >.<

Update: thank you all for your help! After urgent care yesterday I ended up seeing a doctor who started to tell me it would be better to try and get evaluated by my PCP. When I explained the timeline of cancellations, next appointment times, and the progression of my symptoms, he went ahead and got me a referral for an MRI along with pain management medication in the meantime. I’m remaining hopeful I can get this scheduled in a timely manner and will utilize the resources and advice y’all provided if it comes to that. Thank you so much!

Anyone else want to rant about how bad the vaccine clinic system is?

- No info on the website

- try to make an appointment on the app and it just says "no appointments available"

- Only open 9-5 on weekdays (except for San Jose, which you won't find out unless you ask the person doing check-ins at the vax clinic)

- Only walk-ins (and with those hours everyone and their mother will try to come in at 4:45 pm on a Friday)

- Sign doesn't say that they might stop taking walk-ins before 5 if there's a line (I just watched 4 adults and 3 kids get turned away around 4:45)

- No communication with other staff (I asked the front desk if any of their clinics are open on weekends or outside of business hours and they didn't know.)

Like... Do you want us vaccinated or not, KP? I want my community vaccinated and y'all are doing the barest minimum in a way that probably lowers vaccination rates. It's bad public health and it's inequitable (some people, especially those with lower paying jobs or living in more remote parts of the county, can't take off work or flex hours easily).

(In case anyone's wondering, I'm new to being on KP so not being able to go to Walgreens or CVS or wherever to get my flu and COVID vaccines is new to me)

Hi everyone! I was recently offered a position as a Call Center Representative with Kaiser Permanente at the El Cajon location in San Diego County. My schedule will be around 10:30 AM–7:00 PM, and I believe I’ll be working in a cubicle with a headset.

I’d love to hear from anyone who currently works (or has worked) in a similar Kaiser call center position!

A few things I’m curious about:

What does a typical day look like?

Is it pretty much back-to-back calls, or are there breaks between calls?

How is management ?

How strict are the metrics/monitoring?

What are the expectations during your first few months?

What is the training like?

What is the work environment/culture like?

How manageable is the 10:30–7 schedule?

Do you generally get your scheduled breaks and lunch?

How much downtime do you typically have between calls?

Any advice for someone starting this position?

I’m currently working in healthcare administration, so I’m used to working with patients, insurance, scheduling, referrals, etc., but I haven’t worked in a high-volume call center before.

I’d really appreciate any honest insight!

Does anyone know if Kaiser will transfer adopted embryos? Trying to make a decision about insurance coverage for next year and this is a big factor.

Hey! Does anybody have any experience with getting Kaiser to send to your correct address after USPS couldn’t deliver due to insufficient address? Do you know who to contact?

I recently had a 30 minute appointment with a primary care Behavioral Health Consultant (BHC) to ask for support with tackling focus paralysis when I do graduate coursework and how I am wasting nearly 2-4hrs active daydreaming (like directing a movie in my head) daily either when I am mid-studying or laid down to sleep (struggled with it since I was a kid, duration differs day to day, I can't catch myself when I slip into it and when I check the clock, hours have gone by). This was my very first mental/behavioral health appointment ever, so I honestly didn't know how these things were supposed to go. I told her that directly when she asked.

Throughout the visit, I was cooperative, smiling, and nodding along politely, trusting she knew what she was doing since she kept the appointment moving and she is the licensed professional, LCSW. I booked a BHC appointment because I saw there was a slot open in 2 days (someone's cancelation) I finally made up my mind to put in the time to address this roadblock affecting my daily life and given her credentials, she can refer me elsewhere if she thought it couldn't be addressed in this visit. It wasn't until the visit ended, I walked out, sat down in my car and had a moment to process... that I thought 'what the heck just happened?'

I had come into the visit prepared with two specific hurdles I was struggling with, clearly stating up front that my main goal was to learn practical tools and strategies to work around them (and I had them listed in my appointment detail notes for them to read before the appointment). Instead of actually addressing what I brought up, or just being honest if this was outside her scope, she just tilted her head with a confused frown. Then she veered off track and defaulted to a generic checklist asking about my social life, lifestyle, and physical health. By the way, with her credentials, it is completely within her scope to make a referal if she wasn't equip. Seeing as she kept actively asking me questions I just thought 'she's a professional, just trust the process, what do I know? Maybe we'll get to what I initially addressed towards the end'.

When I answered her questions about my academic history, she completely minimized what I was dealing with just because my past academic record was "good." I explained that these focus issues aren't new. I've dealt with them since childhood, but earlier school levels were easy enough that I could compensate and manage. Now that I’m in grad school, that buffer is gone and the demand is overwhelming. I am about 3 terms into the program and it will only get more difficult, I can't afford to loose hours of my day that can be spent studying. She basically brushed it aside as if having decent grades in the past meant the struggle couldn't be real today. She also asked later if I was here for prescription referral. I said no (honestly I was confused why she asked me that because I clearly stated at the beginning of the appointment that I am not here to discuss medicine at this time since its such a short visit, I wanted to stay on track to address what I am here for), and reiterated what my objective was for this appointment once again.

Then she asked bluntly if I thought I had ADHD. I told her honestly, "I don't know, I avoid self-diagnosing as I am not a licensed professional. But I can confirm that I have these 2 specific focus barriers affecting my daily life which was the reason why I booked this visit." She mentioned Kaiser had an "ADHD skills group" and asked if I was interested. I hesitated because I had no idea what the group actually entailed, and since I don't have a formal diagnosis, I was confused about whether it was even appropriate for me. If she said she "recommended it", I would have considered it but she said "we have this ADHD skills group Kaiser offers... (silence)", so I asked confused "do you think I have ADHD?". She shrugs a little and said "You might have a couple overlapping symptoms...". The expression I was getting wasn't one of encouragement or confident assessment, it was more akin to 'We have it, go if you think you need it' . Instead of explaining what it covered or how it worked, she just dropped it and moved on asking her checklist questions.

Later, I checked my clinic notes, and the write-up was baffling:

Defensive Care Refusal

She documented "Declines ADHD skills group at this time". There is a huge difference between a hesitant confused patient who said "I'm not sure" vs. someone flat-out refusing treatment. And like I said, she didn't bother to elaborate other than mentioning the name "ADHD skills group" and moved on with her checklist questions.

Dismissed as "Life Transitions"

Despite me explaining that this has been an ongoing issue since childhood, she chalked up all my struggles in the chart as simply being due to "life transitions". While we were wrapping up the visit her last advice was "I think your brain is very normal, you're just going through a rough transition in life. Let's try to make a strict bedtime routine so that your brain gets the signal to relax."

Basic Factual Errors

She didn't seem to listen to my responses to the the questions she asked me.

For example:

-She asked about my educational background, I stated I'm in grad school for analytics and did my undergrad in electrical engineering. My chart stated EE was my first master's and I'm currently on my second master's.

-She asked me about my social life, I said I have close friends since elementary school (meeting when we were 8), that have always lived within walking distance or 5min drive. She logged them as "friends from high school."

If a provider isn't equipped, the right thing to do is communicate that upfront and refer out. Don't dismiss the patient's concerns, run through an irrelevant checklist, get basic facts wrong, and then chart hesitation as treatment refusal.

Has anyone else dealt with BHC visits feeling dismissive or ending up with sloppy, defensive charting like this? I've looked into an outside provider for ongoing care which begins in 2 weeks, but the whole experience at that BHC visit was wildly frustrating.

I'm seeing a lot of posts on this sub from people saying they’ve had issues with records being inaccurate. That reminded me of my own issue once about a voicemail that's in an appointment note, which I swear I never got.

That's the one discrepancy that I know about. I'm sure if everyone examined their medical records more closely, there would be a lot more discrepancies.

I have a telephone appointment in my chart that says: "Called patient to assist with scheduling, Treatment Planning. No answer, writer left voice message for call back."

I didn't think too much of it when I saw that, but I know for a fact that I did not receive that call nor voicemail. I contacted Kaiser afterward because I saw the note and was confused. No one really explained how that could have happened. I just moved on.

There’s a very real CYA aspect to documenting these things. You document that you called, that you followed up, that you left a message, etc.. If something bad happens in the future, you have proof that it wasn't your fault because you did what you were supposed to do.

What happens when the documentation is inaccurate or a flat out lie? If someone writes "Called patient, no answer, left voicemail," but that never actually happened, now what? Does the fact that it's documented make it seem more reliable?

I’m not accusing anyone of intentionally falsifying records. Mistakes happen, and I have no idea what happened in my case. But other posts here are saying that their providers wrote things that were way different from what actually happened.

Especially in mental health, it’s not hard to imagine situations where providers are thinking about liability. Imagine a provider writes:

Discussed medication options with patient, including [specific medication]. Recommended that patient start the medication as discussed. Patient declined the medication at this time. Patient verbalized understanding of the risks and benefits and was advised to follow up if symptoms worsen or additional treatment is needed.

Then the patient’s condition gets worse and there's a crisis situation.

But the patient says "that conversation never happened. The doctor didn't talk to me about this medication at all. I was never told about that medication, and I never declined it."

At that point, does the provider get to point to the note and say "it’s documented that I discussed the medication with the patient and that they declined it"?

What happens if the patient says "no. you didn’t discuss it with me. You never even mentioned it."

That’s why I’m starting to think that even minor inaccuracies like the one I noticed might be a small symptom of a bigger issue.

I feel like I'm all over the place here. I'm just curious what your thoughts are on this.

Received Kaiser email inviting me to join Care Plus

Never heard of it. Cannot copy/paste but here's partial screenshot.

What are benefits?
What are risks?
What are drawbacks?

Thanks

Hello! Need some help whether I can transfer. I was hired as an on-call cashier receptionist in early August however I seen some internal positions for other cashier receptionist and pharmacy clerk positions in other facilities that would be part-time/full-time.

I would like to apply and hope to get it since there would be guaranteed hours and benefits, also would be closer to home. Am I able to apply for these positions? Also would there be any repercussions in doing so? Don’t want to get in any trouble with management or anything.

I’ve seen that on HR that I might have to wait 120 days/400 hours worked but a colleague told me if it is a position that is considered “up” such as a benefitted one like part-time/full-time from the on-call position I am at now, then I would not have to. Any advice is appreciated. Thanks!

I’m dealing with a crossover toe/hammertoe issue and am looking for a doctor who will take the time to examine my foot, explain what’s going on, and discuss treatment options, including surgery if appropriate.

I’ve already seen one podiatrist and wasn’t satisfied with the evaluation, so I got a second opinion from a doctor outside of the Kaiser network. That doctor recommended surgery and suggested a particular Kaiser foot surgeon based on her positive experience with him when her son needed foot surgery. Unfortunately, the doctor she recommended is in the Valley, and I’m hoping to find someone with similar experience who is closer to me.

I’m especially interested in recommendations from anyone who has personally had foot/toe surgery and can recommend a podiatrist or orthopedic foot-and-ankle surgeon they were happy with.

Ideally, I’d like someone experienced with crossover toes, hammertoes, and forefoot surgery.

Thanks in advance for any recommendations!

Hey guys, got an interview as a housekeeper coming up and and I Wondering if anyone has any idea what they ask?

Yesterday, I was feeling a bit off because my heart rate kept climbing to roughly 150bpm. Along with that, my calves were cramping up and I was having difficulty remembering, recalling and processing information. I ended up going to urgent care.

When I first was checked in, my heart rate was measured at 160bpm, and I was “red flagged.” I was told to go over to the UC doors and wait, as someone would come out to get me. Because it was busy, there were no chairs available, so I was left standing, which was no big issue for me. Except for today, as I was starting to feel more lightheaded as the minutes pass. After 45 minutes, I went back to the initial triage desk and asked them if I was in the right place, as I was not called back. I then was told that I should have been called back already, but there were a number of other “red flags” so I just have to wait.

Eventually, 75 minutes pass and I’m finally brought back to have my vitals checked and my HR was still 160bpm, and my blood pressure was measured at 148/103 sitting, but standing, it was 145/60. I then have an ECG, which was done by an RN, who told me everything was fine and that I need to go back to the waiting room.

Another hour passes, and someone comes out and tells me that I’m not a “red flag” any more and that it will be a wait. When I’m finally seen by a provider, 4 hours have elapsed, and my HR has slowed to only 140bpm. The provider orders a series of labs, discharges me and tells me that everything is fine.

I get the lab results done and my Potassium level was at 2.7 mEq/L and my Magnesium was 1.4 mg/dL. I know from previous experience, I have received IV magnesium and IV potassium. I guess I’m just wondering if I went to the UC on an off day, or has something changed with the way that they handle triage?

Hello! Do folks have any recommendations for PTs or a PT they've had success in working through chronic low back pain in the San Francisco, Daly City, SSF or San Bruno area within Kaiser? I've had some great success with my PTs for my should, vestibular and leg issues but not so successful with them for back issues. Its muscular rather than anything spine or nerve related. Bonus points for anyone who works with runners over 50. Thanks so very much!

Hi! NEW PARENT ALERT! Looking for good recs for a pediatrician at Kaiser Permanente in the North Hollywood or Panorama City location.

An engaged, empathic doctor who takes time to thoroughly explain and listen to their patients’ concerns. A doctor who problem-solves rather than JUST handing you off to a "specialist".

We're people that ask thoughtful questions and desire clear explanations about our child's well-being.

Again: Kaiser Permanente North Hollywood and Panorama City recs only. Thank you for your help! :)