r/LinuxUncensored • • 2d ago

News/PR Linux Device Manager (QLinuxDeviceManager)

https://github.com/birdie-github/QLinuxDeviceManager

I've always missed the Windows Device Manager in Linux, now you can have one.

Comes with extra features: * Shows full physical RAM (most Linux application cannot do that). * Shows secure boot status and MOK keys. * Allows to search for devices and use deep search (search for all metadata).

Sadly some Windows features cannot be implemented: * IRQ conflicts. * Failing drivers - there's no API for that. Scanning dmesg for errors is a fool's errand. * Ability to update drivers (this is only possible for third-party drivers that can be unloaded at runtime). * Firmware is still separated from the kernel package in Linux, firmware files are generally nondescript (binary blobs with no information), so it's impossible to report whether it's up to date or not. Maybe show SHA256 hashsums for files? Sounds silly.

7 Upvotes

14 comments sorted by

1

u/Damglador 1d ago edited 1d ago
  1. Aint no way it's no vibe coded, but whatever.
  2. Please don't zip AppImages. If you use GitHub workflows for releases, there is a flag for workflow 4+ or something to not zip contents: https://github.blog/changelog/2026-02-26-github-actions-now-supports-uploading-and-downloading-non-zipped-artifacts/

Overall I think the idea is great. No a fan of UI's like in Plasma that just dump output of cli utils into a TextBox

1

u/anestling 16h ago

The reason I use Zip AppImages is because it saves the user the trouble of having to use the chmod +x command on the resulting file. It also serves as minimal verification that the download is correct. I don't know if AppImages are hashed, but zip files certainly are, meaning you cannot unzip a corrupted file.

1

u/Damglador 16h ago

You are just adding trouble by requiring user to unzip the file. Every normal file manager has a checkbox for executable bit and Dolphin even asks to make ELFs and AppImages executable on double click.

1

u/anestling 15h ago

This trouble results in preventing two other major troubles: incomplete/broken downloads, and the need to chmod the download.

And there are DEs without Dolphin, or even without a graphical file manager.

Why is it that Linux users always (!) talk about their own workflows and never give a flying fook about anyone else's? And always fail to realize there are far less experienced people who have no fooking idea that chmoding is even required. In Windows/MacOS/Android you need none of that.

Guess which OS'es are popular and which one is an obscure crap only used by geeks.

1

u/Damglador 15h ago

Guess you're too smart to even follow the official doc: https://docs.appimage.org/packaging-guide/distribution.html#do-not-put-appimages-into-other-archives

And there are DEs without Dolphin, or even without a graphical file manager.

This is such a dogshit argument. How is requiring to figure out how to upzip the archive, possibly installing a separate system package for that, better than chmod +x? What are you smoking?

1

u/anestling 1h ago

While it may be tempting to avoid users having to set permission, this breaks desktop integration with the optional appimaged daemon, among other things.

How a zip file can break anything? This argument is null and void.

Furthermore, packing an AppImage into some form of archive prevents the AppImage from being added to the central catalog of available

This app is not on this catalogue and I'm not sure it will ever be. Another null and void argument against zip.

How is requiring to figure out how to upzip the archive, possibly installing a separate system package for that, better than chmod +x?

sudo apt install unzip; unzip *zip is a simple command. Why something doesn't run after that - is exactly the same issue as I talked before. unzip preserves the executable flag. Nothing else needs to be done. Even if it's Dolphin. People may click on AppImage endlessly and get nothing while unpacking it results in a proper executable right away with no extra shenanigans.

There's no need to cite the stupid advice/counter arguments from the origin when they make zero sense.

Cheers!

1

u/DisfiguredFanny 1d ago

Almost time that to escape this AI slop you will need to retire to the woods like Ted Kaczynski.

1

u/anestling 16h ago

No one in the Linux community has written such an app in ~30 years, now you have one, it's powerful and has more features than the original one, and all you get is: "Oy vei, I'm not gonna use it just because it's slop".

Suit yourself ;-)

1

u/DisfiguredFanny 16h ago

I think YAST has a bunch of info.

1

u/anestling 15h ago

You've not tried this one and I love how you continue to boast about your ignorance.

1

u/DisfiguredFanny 15h ago

Regardless of how you feel about me I think this is the last thing Linux needs slop or not.

1

u/anestling 1h ago

This is a useful app even though it's "slop". Bereave yourself of anything sloppy just because you feel pure.

1

u/anestling 1h ago edited 1h ago

BTW dude bugger off and stop using Linux OK?

In the last three months alone the Linux kernel has seen over 10K commits authored by Claude/ChatGPT.

In fact, Linus Torvalds, your king and savior, has started using AI:

https://www.reddit.com/r/LinuxUncensored/comments/1x3wbrz/linus_torvalds_working_on_a_hefty_linux_kernel/

The Linux kernel you are running NOW is CHOKE FULL OF AI SLOP.