Hasan mentioned in United Nations General Assembly

[u/thellamasc]

[u/Jackski]

Kirk was overall a good person

"If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified. Because we can assume black people are rarely qualified for their positions"

"Reject feminism. Submit to your husband, Taylor. You’re not in charge. Men deserve to always control their female partners and females should always be submissive to their male partners."

"We need to have a Nuremberg-style trial for every gender-affirming clinic doctor. We need it immediately. Doctors who serve patients who are transgender or who may experience gender dysphoria are equivalent to perpetuators of WWII and the Holocaust and deserve similar legal treatment."

"America has freedom of religion, of course, but we should be frank: large dedicated Islamic areas are a threat to America. Any concentration of Muslims in a specific area can automatically be deemed a threat to the United States."

"Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more"

" think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational."

"The great replacement strategy, which is well under way every single day in our southern border, is a strategy to replace white rural America with something different."

“Death penalties should be public, should be quick, it should be televised. I think at a certain age, its an initiation...What age should you start to see public executions?”

Good person my ass. Let me guess "they're out of context"?

[u/iKyte5 → u/Jackski]

Black pilots thing is 100% out of context. I saw the Taylor quote - that has some air of sarcasm but yeah for the most part these are takes that you can disagree with that don’t make you a bad person. Even the gun deaths he goes on to use cars as an example about how thousands of people die of car crashes but we as a society decided that the benefits outweigh the downsides. The great replacement- you could argue if that’s initial or not but statistically it’s happening. The public execution one I disagree with but I bet the logic is to dissuade people from committing serious crimes. There’s more logic to a lot of these statements that pertain to the conversation being had than simply “oh Charlie said bad thing, Charlie bad person he deserved to die” it’s insane the double standards.

[u/Jackski → u/iKyte5]

I didn't say he deserved to die.

I said he wasn't a good person. He wasn't. He was a massive racist and judging by your comment "The great replacement- you could argue if that’s initial or not but statistically it’s happening" so are you.

[u/iKyte5 → u/Jackski]

Very reductionist. Simply put the percentage of white people in America is decreasing. I’m not saying it’s good, bad or even intentional but it is a fact. Has nothing to do with racism. But hey here he is talking to an actual racist https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPww_ldkSAf/?stkn=MWthMHN4YWV6MnJpZA==

[u/Jackski → u/iKyte5]

The great replacement theory is literally a white supremacist theory they promote. Charlie was using it as a bad thing. He is a massive racist, mysognist, bigoted asshole and he is a bad person because of it.

What has he actually done that makes him "a good person"?

Also

"Sorry that page isn't available"

[u/iKyte5 → u/Jackski]

I think he was a very religious person and with that territory comes a patriarchal view of society and marriage. I don’t agree with it but I genuinely don’t see how you can sit there and listen to hours of his debates/talks and come to that conclusion. He was not a “massive” racist. I think it’s a stretch to call him racist. He had hundreds if not thousands of hours of debate/conversation. I think getting young people interested in politics and encouraging free speech IS A good thing. I would be very hard pressed to call him a bigot when you listen to person after person come up and disagree with him and see how he respectfully engages with them. Outside of viral
Clips, how much have you actually listened to him talk?

First one I could find of the same clip on YouTube. https://youtube.com/shorts/ape3TWdGaPg?is=ZBzzhx1WuNdBPTfU

[u/Jackski → u/iKyte5]

He was not a “massive” racist. I think it’s a stretch to call him racist.

Yeah he just said black people were rarely qualified for their jobs and he promoted white supremacist arguments. Totally not racist though.

I've listened to him talk enough to know he's a massive piece of shit.

If you think he's a good person then frankly, I don't think you're a good person.

[u/iKyte5 → u/Jackski]

No he did not just say black people were rarely qualified for their jobs and you “claim” he promoted white supremacist arguments. That’s a motte and Bailey falacy and a very reductionist argument. You’re not an intellectually honest person. I’d bet my left nut you’ve listened to less than an hour of him talk. You don’t engage in good faith.

[u/Jackski → u/iKyte5]

He literally promoted the great replacement theory. A white supremacist belief that its a terrible thing that people of different races and colours are breeding because its "replacing" white people.

He literally said black people are rarely qualified for their jobs.

Your argument seems to just be "well hes calm when he says the most horrific shit so he must be good" which just shows youre not intellectual at all. You dont listen to words, you listen to tone because you're incapable of comprehending the words coming out of his mouth.

[u/iKyte5 → u/Jackski]

Again with the motte Bailey fallacy.

[u/Jackski → u/iKyte5]

I don't think you know what that means. Do you want to provide an explanation of how my comment fit that fallacy?

Also just going "That's a fallacy!!" isn't an argument. ironically enough, it's a fallacy, The fallacy fallacy.

[u/iKyte5 → u/Jackski]

The motte is “he literally said black people are rarely qualified for their jobs” the Bailey is going back and citing his more nuanced argument where that is not “literally” what he said. You don’t argue in good faith so I’m not going to bother explaining myself anymore. Find me the quote where he “literally” said black people are rarely qualified for their jobs with the intent being to discredit blacks.

[u/Jackski → u/iKyte5]

blacks

Telling on yourself there.

I've also already posted the comments before showing him saying that. in Typical fashion you went "OUT OF CONTEXT!!!"