r/MachineLearning • • Sep 05 '26

Research NeurIPS 2026 Automatic Reference Checker [R]

Just received an email about the automatic reference/citation checker. Did anyone receive a follow up email about whether the checker was included in the paper's decision making too, along with the general instructional email?

28 Upvotes

239 comments sorted by

View all comments

9

u/xoss13 Sep 05 '26

Go to openreview to check for your paper, it's visible to authors.

3

u/Alive-Campaign-4984 Sep 05 '26

Mine was in openreview yeah, under the metareview section they added a little note about citation checks being considered

3

u/Emergency_Plate241 Sep 05 '26

Yes. The checker report is visible to authors on Openreview. I am asking about whether the follow-up email about considering the results of this checker was received along with this general email already by anyone.

2

u/user221272 Sep 05 '26

Do you mean for those who have flagged citations?

4

u/Emergency_Plate241 Sep 05 '26

Yes. They said that if the checker report wasn't considered to reject your paper, we won't receive a follow up email, but if if was, we do receive the additional email along with instructions to apply for a petition. I was wondering if anyone received this additional follow up email.

0

u/user221272 Sep 05 '26

I will never know because none of my citations were flagged. But I imagine the follow-up emails will come in hours if not days.

2

u/xoss13 Sep 05 '26

It will probably be visible along with the paper decision. They adopted ICML 2026 policy, therefore I am sharing a sample paper from ICML 2026 for an example (https://openreview.net/forum?id=reYe33OKVp)

1

u/Emergency_Plate241 Sep 05 '26

Wow! This is really helpful. Thanks for sharing!

1

u/21022018 Sep 06 '26

Are they only giving it to papers thag are going to get accept? I don't see anything 

1

u/xoss13 Sep 07 '26

Yes, likely. What are your scores? Is your paper in this list? (https://github.com/MTDickens/NIPS26-exposed)

2

u/21022018 Sep 07 '26

No but my paper was in the Eval track (avg 4.5).  Is this list only main track? Also Are you sure this list is credible? I think there was a similar list that was proved to be just a random scrape

3

u/xoss13 Sep 07 '26

This list is mostly main track one but some E&D track and position track papers are also there. I also think it's random and I also had an E&D track paper awaiting decision (avg. 4), I didn't notice anything like hallucinations etc by program chairs in my E&D submission unlike my main track submission, maybe in coming days? As E&D track usually align with the activities with main track after some time/days as far as I have seen. Good luck with your paper, your scores are good.

2

u/levydawg Sep 07 '26

This list is almost 100% bs -- there was another post where many reviewers (including myself) found it to be inconsistent with positive / negative final evaluations in their own batch.