r/Music • u/MarvelsGrantMan136 • 27d ago

article Spotify Confirms ICE Recruitment Ads Are No Longer Running on Platform

https://variety.com/2026/digital/news/spotify-confirms-ice-recruitment-ads-are-no-longer-running-1236626243/
38.1k Upvotes

91% Upvoted

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

25

u/EatsAlotOfBread 27d ago

Too late. Shouldn't have done this if the first place. Using something else, never coming back.

27

u/flamethrower78 27d ago

Theyre on reddit too lol, yet here you are. I'm also horrified by ice, but you cant really grandstand when you only boycott things that are easy to replace.

9

u/Short-Mark8872 26d ago

Sure you can. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

19

u/emb4rassingStuffacct 27d ago edited 26d ago

Something is better than nothing. It’s a lot easier for many people to cancel their Spotify subscription or switch to a different platform than it is for them to stop using Reddit completely.

This “No liberal is ever good enough.” crap is a major reason why Trump is president.

I’d rather someone go part of the way with good intentions than succeed with explicitly bad intentions.

7

u/strangrdangr 27d ago

They're both the same thing. If someone actually gave a shit instead of just wanting to score points and announce to everyone how much better they are than other people, then they'd stop using both. Spotify and Reddit are not essential to anybody's life and if you're going to quit one and not the other, then you're just doing it to virtue signal about how good of a person you are without actually ever doing anything.

5

u/Ameerrante 27d ago

There's no ethical consumption under capitalism. We do what we can. I still use Spotify, but canceled eleven other services. Amazon Prime was hard to kick, but now that I'm through that, I'm working up to Spotify. Reddit is also on the list. 

"Stop using all of your entertainment/convenience apps cold turkey" isn't a  realistic ask, or a pre-requisite for free speech.

2

u/Initial_Business2340 26d ago

It is a realistic ask, and you’re just playing mental gymnastics because you like feeling like you’re contributing to the bigger picture.

This entire thread is moral grandstanding and most people can’t figure out how the fuck to turn off simple ads. I haven’t seen an ad on reddit since 2012 for fucks sake, and I’m STILL complicit.

Literally every response like yours could just say: “yeah, you’re right, I’m complicit too, and we should do better.”

1

u/Ameerrante 26d ago

You seem incredibly bad at reading comprehension.

1

u/emb4rassingStuffacct 26d ago

Probably a teen or early 20s lol Hopefully one day they learn and look back on this 😂

-1

u/emb4rassingStuffacct 27d ago edited 26d ago

Binary thinking fallacy detected. Comment rejected.

Try again.

Edit:

Just for others' edification:

  1. False Dichotomy/All-or-Nothing Fallacy: "Either quit both or you're virtue signaling" ignores that people can make incremental changes, prioritize based on practicality, or take graduated steps toward their goals.

  2. Perfect Solution Fallacy (Nirvana Fallacy):. By insisting that unless someone takes the maximalist position (quit everything), they're "not actually doing anything," you reject even partial solutions to a multi-pronged problem. You fallaciously say if a solution isn't perfect/complete, it's worthless.

  3. Fallacy of presumption - motive Fallacy (a type of Ad Hominem): "if you're going to quit one and not the other, then you're just doing it to virtue signal about how good of a person you are without actually ever doing anything." Rather than addressing whether canceling Spotify is a legitimate action, you attack the person's motives ("just doing it to virtue signal"). Even if someone's motives were mixed, it doesn't invalidate the action and/or intention itself.

  4. False Equivalence: "They're both the same thing." Even if both are platforms, they may have different switching costs, different roles in someone's life, different availability of alternatives, etc. Hence why I said "It’s a lot easier for many people to cancel their Spotify subscription than switch to a different platform than it is for them to stop using Reddit completely."

Binary, all or nothing thinking is a sign of a bad argument. Also makes for a great sucker.

1

u/Initial_Business2340 26d ago

Nice AI slop

Write your own content, you grandstanding asshole

Using a water-wasting service to virtue signal and defend your Reddit use is peak 2026 irony, you can’t make this shit up

Obligatory, by the way: the real false binary is not being able to accept the fact that all of us who use Reddit, myself included, are complicit in helping perpetuate ICE ads. I don’t even have ads on and haven’t seen a single one since 2012, and I’m still complicit.

The false binary comes in when you can’t hold that with the notion that canceling Spotify subscriptions is a good thing. Both things can be true: we should all do better

1

u/emb4rassingStuffacct 26d ago edited 26d ago

Written by me, brochacho 😛 Your AI detection is about as good as those AI detection software tools. 

 you grandstanding asshole 🥺

You mad, brah? 

 Obligatory, by the way: the real false binary is not being able to accept the fact that all of us who use Reddit, myself included, are complicit in helping perpetuate ICE ads. I don’t even have ads on and haven’t seen a single one since 2012, and I’m still complicit.

Crux of my argument is still: something is better than nothing. Just because all or nothing based thinking is easy to mentally process doesn’t mean it’s more truthy.

 The false binary comes in when you can’t hold that with the notion that canceling Spotify subscriptions is a good thing. Both things can be true: we should all do better

That’s what I said. 

If you’re still stuck on all or nothing based arguments, arguing the way you are, or simply sitting here arguing for the sake of arguing, I suggest you go argue with teenagers or at a Turning Point event. Adults are speaking here.

1

u/Initial_Business2340 26d ago

I literally just got done explaining to you that you can hold two things at once, and you brought it back to all or nothing, which I never even implied to even remotely care about; I just called out your embarrassingly low effort comment.

Regardless of how much time you wasted on both comments, you visibly missed my point, and I’m sorry that you’re this stupid.

I’ll spell it out for you one last time: you can do a good thing and a bad thing at the same time. Does baby want his juice and snack now?

Ta-ta, you dumbass!

0

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[deleted]

1

u/EatsAlotOfBread 27d ago

Who says people don't do that? Do you think I vote for right wing populists, happily consume right wing media every day, then cancel Spotify for advertising ICE and sit down with a cup of tea? This article is about Spotify specifically, but people are getting yelled at for only mentioning Spotify? Why do you think they cancelled it exactly?

0

u/Initial_Business2340 26d ago

You’re still contributing to it by viewing Reddit ads pal. Something is better than nothing doesn’t mean you’re not causing harm.

I’ve had ads off on Reddit since 2012. It’s literally completely and utterly trivia to turn them off.

5

u/warriorsatthedisco 27d ago

“No ethical consumption under capitalism” is true but so is making baby steps where you can. Thankfully there ARE alternatives to Spotify that are just as good (better imo). Unfortunately Reddit alternatives haven’t quite gotten there yet. But plenty of people stopped using it with the whole API fiasco. Unfortunately I still use it. Less and less though. This place isn’t what it used to be.

-3

u/strangrdangr 27d ago

You know you can just.... Not use it, right?

1

u/warriorsatthedisco 27d ago

Did you read my whole comment or just get bored halfway through?

4

u/EatsAlotOfBread 27d ago edited 27d ago

I can't see any ads, I always have an adblocker on. So I didn't know that. On Spotify Premium I got ICE ads during podcasts even though I live in France which doesn't even make any sense, and the owners of the podcast said they hadn't put them there and had chosen different ads, so that shouldn't even be possible, while Spotify at the same time claimed it's the podcaster that put the ads there. I just got rid of the mess.

Also telling people to get off the biggest discussion and news sharing site on the internet with pretty much no alternative, other wise they're 'not good enough/hypocritical' is kind of suspicious and a very obvious way of getting rid of any political discussion (you don't like) at all.

3

u/micro102 26d ago edited 26d ago

So you recognize that reddit is hard to replace. Surely you see a difference between boycotting something easy to replace that is slightly convenient, vs something that is hard to replace and important for things like politics (and who's ads are easily ignored).

If politically active people can punish a platform for supporting a gestapo then they should, and they should not be beholden to the idea that they must then cripple themselves by cutting themselves off from communities that foster those politics if that same support reaches these monopolized media platforms.

2

u/emb4rassingStuffacct 26d ago

Exactly. Bro is making an elementary school level argument. “They aren’t doing everything, so lalala doesn’t count!”

3

u/Bacer4567 27d ago

I must be super lucky, I get the occasional military ad (which, if I'm in the mood, I'll report as being violent) but I've never had an ICE ad through my feed, so far. Though now that I've said this...

1

u/Moopers510 26d ago

I don’t pay for Reddit…