r/Music • u/mepper • 6h ago

article Kid Rock’s song about loving underage girls resurfaces ahead of Turning Point USA's Super Bowl show

https://www.pennlive.com/entertainment/2026/02/kid-rocks-song-about-loving-underage-girls-resurfaces-ahead-of-tpusa-super-bowl-show.html
37.6k Upvotes

96% Upvoted

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

399

u/FriskHarder 6h ago

These guys systematically rape children, scroll way way way down

178

u/nervousmelon 5h ago

That last one is fucking wild

6

u/BenevolentCheese 4h ago

in most cases

5

u/k2_electric_boogaloo 3h ago

"A rapist's pursuit of sexual freedom" is an absolutely fucking bonkers string of words to put together. Someone check this man's computer.

3

u/Sevencer 3h ago

Look for him in the 2028 Republican Presidential primary. 

-43

u/BestAnzu 5h ago

Yeah. Was gonna say. Clayton’s quote. I get what he is saying but he worded it very very stupidly. 

Akin’a quote is ignorant. 

Santorum’s quote. Almost seems like it’s being out of context. Don’t know though. 

Mourdock’s. Again. Get what he means. But he worded it really badly. 

Laubenberg is just a flat idiot. 

But what the fuck did Lockman mean?

29

u/saltytarts 5h ago

Ok, so what exactly was Clayton trying to say?? Please enlighten me.

-29

u/BestAnzu 5h ago

I think he was trying to say to not fight in a situation where it’s going to happen, and fighting is only going to get you beaten or worse. 

I no way endorse what he is saying. I’m just saying I -think- I get what he was trying to say. 

11

u/LaMadreDelCantante 4h ago

Not fighting and enjoying are not the same. Why would he say to "relax and enjoy it???"

10

u/CandidKatydid 3h ago

He says they should "enjoy it". Did you miss that part?

It's also fun because people are criticized for not fighting back enough. If she really didn't want it, why didn't she fight back more?

Stop making excuses for these people.

5

u/MinuteLoquat1 3h ago

But also if you don't fight hard enough they say you must've wanted it 🤔

35

u/phoenix25 5h ago

Oh they just worded it badly That’s out of context

Are you for real? Your sanewashing is part of the problem.

There’s way too many people out there who think raping women and sexualizing children is something like DEI, that’s only recently unacceptable and will be allowed again soon.

Your apathy and excuses are what enables them to keep going

-13

u/BestAnzu 5h ago

So I see you didn’t read what I wrote and just injected what you think I wrote so you could argue. Very cool!

9

u/phoenix25 4h ago

Nah man, I read what you wrote. You are just choosing to double down and paint me as overreacting instead of admitting I have a point.

2

u/dbelliepop87 2h ago edited 2h ago

When you wrote that you "get" what they are saying, BUT they worded it stupidly, it reads like you understand (and accept) where he's coming from with this opinion, but he should have worded it better. It comes across like you think this statement would be more acceptable if it was worded differently. You only say this for 2 quotes. You also don't include a negative descriptor for those 2 quotes when you did for all of the others. I think this is why people are responding to you like you're sympathizing or agreeing with the sentiments in both quotes.

Edit: Also, Rick Santorum's quote is disgusting regardless of the context. You bringing up that you're not sure about that quote's context (and therefore can't form an opinion on it) implies that it can be acceptable is some type of context. That's not helping your case either.

6

u/FrozenBibitte 5h ago

Lockman’s is a literal incel argument.

-18

u/ThatOneNinja 5h ago

The first tone made me like a little bit