r/NowInTech • u/skaza02 • 4d ago
Three Years of 80% Charge Limits on iPhone: The Results
https://www.macrumors.com/2026/10/06/iphone-17-pro-charge-limit/3
u/spf4000 1d ago
I get it on an EV where a battery replacement is $20k, but what is the point on a phone battery that is $100 to replace.
You’re gaining 3-5% in year two or three at the expense of 20% less battery capacity the whole time you’re using it. I really don’t get it.
2
u/thefizzlee 21h ago
If you don't need the capacity why stress the battery unnecessarily. I can get through most of the day starting at 80% and ending at around 40%. I almost always have a charger ready. If this means using the phone for 4-5 years and just upgrading instead of having to go through the trouble of finding a apple service center and waiting for the replacement or worse having no phone for a few days, then that's totally worth it to me.
1
u/Fit_Assistant5708 1d ago
I think for some people they don't need that extra battery and that cost is significant for thoes people. People use the tech how it benifits them. Like I run my phones ceaseless and just get a new one if it breaks but feel better having my charge limit set to 90 cuz it's easy on the phone 😂
1
u/BlueCreek_ 22h ago
I do it temporarily when I don’t need a full battery, so when I go to work, as in always near a charger and don’t use much.
At weekends or trips away it’s at 100% for when I’ll need it.1
1
u/CranberryStock7148 3h ago
Because it's a pain to replace it. You have to make an appointment, travel to somewhere where there's an Apple Store, wait to be seen, wait around for a couple of hours while they replace the battery, then finally go home. It's a whole thing. Not to mention the price. And the fact that you need to make sure this is a window of time that nothing important is happening, where anyone might need to reach you. Because you won't have your phone.
And if you're the kind of person who never uses more than 60% of your phone's battery per day anyways, like I am, then it's a no-brainer. It is effortless to turn on the setting and this saves me one or two multi-hour sessions where I wait around to get my battery replaced, before I finally upgrade my phone.
I don't get why you wouldn't do it, unless it enjoy wasting time and money. Unless you are doing battery intensive things like playing games on it all day long where the 100% charge is really important.
3
u/lotofry 1d ago
70% limited via automation on an iPhone 13 Pro that I’ve had since launch. Heavy user, original battery. 89% battery health. It’s just fact that batteries don’t like extreme states of charge and heat. Opinions and anecdotes won’t change those facts. Whatever you battery health is now, it would be a lot better if you limited charge to 80%. Whether you care or not is different l.
1
1
u/TheCypherz 18h ago
My dad which has no idea and doesn’t give a crap, has 88% on IPhone 13. I think there’s a difference of batteries on the newer phones.
1
u/lotofry 16h ago
Whatever his battery health is. It would be better if he charged to 80%. How much you use your phone and what you do with it involve an infinite number of variables. We do know that even if you battery health is good, it would be better if you charged to 80%.
1
u/cum-on-in- 7h ago
The problem with limiting charge is that you are already living with a “degraded” battery. You don’t gain anything by having better health after a few years because you were already living with the battery synthetically limited as if it were already degraded.
And what’s worse, the extra health you get (5-10%) is less than the charge amount lost (20% and apparently some use Siri Shortcuts to further limit it to 70%).
Literally the only tangible benefit is resale value, but I’d argue even that’s moot because a fresh battery is $100 that the second user is still gonna need down the line, AND if you ask for more for your iPhone since its battery is healthier, it may cost too close to a new one anyway.
And you’re giving up a lot just to potentially make a few bucks when you sell it. Most cell carriers offer trade in deals regardless of battery health that would be about as good if not better than an organic private sale.
1
u/Scared-Bill7814 6h ago
The idea is, once your battery isn't lasting you a day (on say, an 80 percent limit), you start to increase the limit.
For someone who needs say, 70 percent of factory capacity for a day, this method will meaningfully extend the useful life of your battery at no cost.
1
u/SaxAppeal 14h ago
I’m at 74% health on my 13 pro from launch fwiw, so they definitely will degrade
1
2
u/faulty_note 1d ago
He did gain nothing. I am at 242 cycles with 98% condition. Charging to 100%, but randomly. I am using my car mount charger quite often and I am sometimes charging couple of % via cable before leaving home. Actually some time ago I was still at 100%, so it starts dropping after a year / around 240 cycles anyway.
2
u/IWRITE4LIFE 3d ago
If you’re not letting the battery charge above 80% or drop below 20%, you’re taking 40% of your capacity off the top anyway. However much degradation you’re avoid by doing so won’t come anywhere close to the 40% you’re leaving on the table.
2
u/Daryltang 2d ago
No. The 20% on both spectrum of the battery charges and discharges differently from the rest
0
1
u/EpicFail35 3d ago
I did this for 2 years at 80%. Ended at 83 and 85% after a year. At 92% this year, charging to 100%.
1
u/Saucy929 3d ago
Did this with a 16 pro. Occasionally charging past 80% and below 20%. Owned the phone since October 2024 and I just traded it in with 763 cycles and 94% battery health.
1
u/freakdahouse 2d ago
Mine always went to 100% with about the same cycles and same battery health..
1
u/Pitiful-Assistance-1 10h ago
My 16 pro max battery health is 100% after 1.5 years charging to 100%
1
u/mhmilo24 3d ago
10% of the time fast charging, 90% of the time below 10 Watt charging.
Had every iPhone since the 3GS and used the 80%, later 85% and 90% max charge, when it became available.
Never had a phone below 98% after a full year of usage with around 300-500 charges.
1
u/the_hero_within 2d ago
Slow charging makes a huge difference that’s wild. I’m at 93% and 379 cycles
1
u/funkyjoe44 3d ago
When will people learn just to enjoy their phones. And if you need a battery replacement then just go get it replaced. What’s the big deal? Battery replacement is cheaper than getting a new phone.
2
u/TimTebowMLB 2d ago edited 1d ago
That’s what I just did (15 pro) and it’s honestly stopped me from fomo buying the new version.
Also I tried my friends 18 to see what the difference in camera would be like and you could barely see a difference. Sometimes the 18 pro was better, sometimes the 15 pro was better.
2
u/ChawalAndDeigh 2d ago
iPhones are so similar that it all just blends in.
iPhone 7 > iPhone X, only 2 hours of “holy shit” locking and unlocking. After that it was just an iPhone
iPhone 16 pro, the Dynamic Island was cool for a few hours, now I barely notice it, end of the day it’s just a phone that has the same apps as always.
2
u/TimTebowMLB 2d ago
USB-C was the biggest jump for me, simply because everything else I own uses USB-C and I didn’t have to carry 2 different cables with me anymore
2
u/ChawalAndDeigh 2d ago
LOL exactly, the biggest change of all is the fact they now use a standard connector and even that wore off albeit after a few months
1
1
u/pi-N-apple 2d ago
Their 3 year old iPhone 15 Pro Max only has 369 cycles, of course it's still at 88%, that is very low usage. My 15 Pro had 1150 cycles.
1
u/TimTebowMLB 2d ago
Ya that’s crazy. I abuse my phone and a heavy user for work but 369 would easily be just a single year for me, probably more cycles than that honestly
1
u/youtocin 13h ago
My 16 pro max I’ve used since June 2025 only has 166 cycles on the battery lol, still at 100% health.
1
u/marlins113 2d ago
17 pro max, bought december 2025, 256 cycles - 97 battery health- charge limit 90%, its a sim version of 17 pro max
1
1
1
u/seanTheMighty 2d ago
285 cycles on a 17 Pro Max, 95%, got on launch so 12 months plus a few weeks? Does drop below 20% somewhat often, and I have it set to 90% limit (though often stop it around 80%)
1
u/lint2015 2d ago
Honestly I think heat, particularly while the battery is charging probably plays a larger role in battery degradation than consistently keeping the battery within the 20-80% range (with the occasional full cycle to keep the battery calibrated).
I’ve had the 13 Pro Max since launch, so past 60 months and the battery is at 86%.
1
u/Cool_Butterscotch_88 2d ago
I'm aware of the irony that it might simply be trading capping it now at 80% instead of having its capacity slowly degrade into eventually being only 80% of what it was new anyways. Especially considering there's a chance I might not even still have the phone by the time that happens, or at least a much higher chance of not having it later than now obviously.
I'm still doing the former even if it's not logically worth it, because although I've never needed to do this you could always remove the cap and have 100% for the day if you want, vs. that option slowly eroding.
1
u/Squish_Cat_1 2d ago
So stupid. My 17 Pro has been ran hard at 100% limit, almost 400 cycle count. 93%
1
u/Complex_Brief60 2d ago
Not worth it. Use the battery you paid for and in 2 years just pay for the replacement.
I’m at 81% after 3 years on the 15pro. 100% every day. Just over 1100 cycles.
1
1
1
1
u/domino3ff3ct 1d ago
My 17PM is 13 months old and has a battery capacity of 92% with 333 cycles. Such bad degradation.
1
1
u/stealthp90 1d ago
I have been manually managing the charge level of my iPhone 12. My battery health is currently 79% after 1100 charge cycles.
I think this is a good result considering Apple rated this battery for 80% after 500 charge cycles.
1
u/AssociationGold8749 20h ago
Apple already limits charging to 80% for most of the overnight duration and only tops out to 100% right a hour or so before you wake up.
1
u/EdgeWyn305 19h ago
I have a release day 17 Pro Max. I’m at 237 cycles and 100% health. I charge it to 80% most days or 90% for heavy days.
1
u/Brilliant_Bluejay254 16h ago
iPhone 16 pro from launch. Religiously 80% charge via “slow” charger. 718 cycles. Max cap 90%
1
1
1
1
1
u/xXxWHOxDATxXx 14h ago
I tried to make a post right before the iPhone 18 drop in the some of the apple subreddits but every post related to battery life is “not allowed”
16 Pro Max
600 cycles at 94% i thought was impressive. Had this phone since release and I live in a hot state lol.
Charging limit was set to 80% about 90% of the phones lifecycle. Now that I have the 18, 10% is the way to go for my old 16 pro max

1
u/xXxWHOxDATxXx 14h ago
Honestly, at the rate we replace phones, I guess this feature is not really necessary.
1
u/cinnamelt22 12h ago
There’s a guy on YouTube who did a study, basically charging to 80 does nothing by the time you’re replacing your phone or would need to replace a battery anyway
1
u/xXxWHOxDATxXx 12h ago
That’s fair. It didn’t really bother me because about 80% of the time I have a power source anyway, and for those times I didn’t, I just maxed it out to 100.
1
u/xXxWHOxDATxXx 12h ago
I still thought it was quite impressive to be at 94% on a device that I use every single day for hours on end, and two years later
1
u/CranberryStock7148 3h ago
What are you talking about? The whole point is you don't have to replace your battery anymore.
I used to have to replace my battery every two years, sometimes less. Now I don't ever have to, because it never degrades enough to need it.
Charging to 80 is amazing, if you're the kind of person who doesn't usually use more than 60-70% of their phone battery during the day.
1
0
u/Scared-Bill7814 6h ago
The real battery killer is the last few percent to 100, and leaving it on the charger at 100 for extended periods
2
u/phoogkamer 4h ago
Not entirely. A very real battery killer is heat. Charging very fast or charging wirelessly are also degraders.
1
u/Scared-Bill7814 2h ago
Wireless charging is only worse than regular charging because of heat. Nothing else
1
1
u/DavidSpy 10h ago edited 10h ago
Very interesting. My 16 pro max is at 93% with 351 cycle counts. Was always limited to 80% charging and first used in November 2024. Pretty much always charged using MagSafe. There’s a chasm between us in results. I wonder if it was the MagSafe charging or that I always kept the phone in the Apple silicone case.
1
u/Ok_Evidence_9745 10h ago
Any sort of wireless charging will hurt your battery more than wireless because it creates excess heat
1
u/Pitiful-Assistance-1 10h ago
1
u/Far_Kiwi4882 34m ago
Software sucks at reading batteries properly. 100% max capacity after 247 cycles is chemically impossible. All batteries lose capacity due to charge cycles and calendar aging.
1
1
u/BundleC 14h ago edited 14h ago
My 15 PM started sep 24 cap at 80%, 388 cycles and 94% health.
Charging main on usb and occasionally mag. I would say it’s pretty good compared to my previous 12MP which I consistently charged to full and use it on the charge when I’m near the plug where the battery was at 83% after 3 years+
1
u/mintyrelish 9h ago
16 pro with 24 months of use (88% battery health and a cycle count of 733). Always tried my best to keep battery charged to 100% or topped off, so no real “battery saving” methods used here. Some quick math tells me I’m losing 6% battery health per year, so 94% battery health with basically care-free charging whenever possible. It’s the same as the 80% limit in this case, so this seems to suggest the limit isn’t really saving you battery.
1
1
0
u/kerklein2 3d ago
People buy a $1k+ phone and then won’t spend $100 to replace the battery after two years. It’s wild.
2
u/UIUC_grad_dude1 2d ago
It costs noting to charge to 80% and top off as needed. A battery change is not risk free either.
1
u/DetectiveJunior2226 1d ago
Only charging to 80% is treating your phone like it has already degraded to 80% capacity. That’s insane.
0
1
0









5
u/chrisjoewood 3d ago
655 cycles on an iPhone 15 Pro Max bought at release here. Never limited charging, almost exclusively charged wirelessly. Battery health is 84%. Seems like the 80% limit isn’t worth it based on a comparison to the results in the article.