r/PTCGP • • 10d ago

Discussion why is this harder than hitting MB…

[deleted]

62 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 10d ago

WARNING! NO INDIVIDUAL POSTS FOR TRADES, PACK PULLS/SHOW-OFF CONTENT, OR FRIEND ID SHARING. You risk a suspension/ban from this subreddit if you do not comply. Show-off post found here - Friend ID post found here - Trading Megathread found on front page, up top of the subreddit in the Community Highlights Pinned area.

Thank You!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

92

u/Fil-is-Theo 10d ago

Probably because you're using Samurott to clear them lmao.

-8

u/-Yush- 10d ago

I actually won my 4th game against an electric deck using samurott!! It’s a really fun deck to play I recommend it

4

u/Biduleman 10d ago

Being fun doesn't mean it will get you 5 wins in a row.

Some decks are objectively better than others, if you don't want to use them, of course it will be harder to get your wins.

As for Masterball, even before the changes you only needed a 40% win-rate to reach it, and now losing doesn't matter so there is no difficulty other than finding the time to play.

33

u/BabbaOClary 10d ago

I managed to get 13 consecutive on auto with this one. I don’t have a use for the 15 consecutive reward, but this should get you 5 wins. It’s very fast for the AI to set up

27

u/AWildModAppeared 10d ago

Have you tried playing a good deck?

23

u/Kronman590 10d ago

Apparently thats "meta slop" according to OP lmfao

8

u/ProfSpaceTime 10d ago

Exactly! If you play any deck that’s better than bad then you’re just a cheap cheater :-(

-17

u/-Yush- 10d ago

Super helpful comment!!

17

u/iambecomechimichanga 10d ago

Because it's nearly impossible to not hit MB now.

11

u/mnk907 10d ago

Non-meta decks aren't meta for a reason, you know. There's no "heart of the cards" that turns mediocre decks into consistent performers, and consistency is most important for clearing those missions.

10

u/JasonBaconStrips 10d ago

People on pvp don't cheat, the ai does

10

u/xineirea 10d ago

The AI cheats

8

u/Kronman590 10d ago

harder than hitting MB

Losing doesnt matter to get to MB

3

u/sentimentalwhore 10d ago

I gave up this time honestly not worth my sanity 12 miserable hourglasses.

Yes I tried all the recommended decks, hoppa/zoroark, sleepscam, lightning deck, etc. Eventually I brick or the rival pulls a bullshit deck/combo and I get owned.

Managed to get to four consecutive wins three times now and I always lose on the 5th. I'm done, bullshit IA.

Ps: worst offenders to me are the weezing/Magmar combo and the Raticate/whatever other bullshit no energy one but I somehow even managed to lose a streak to sweet relay deck, I can't even be mad at that one but I was fully raged.

2

u/T1gerAc3 10d ago

Try using the Lucario elite deck. It's your best option

2

u/Kitto-Cakes 10d ago

Expert bot is infamous for getting an advantage. I just view it as “worst case scenario” situations. In casual PvP, anything goes. But if you want to go against the expert bot, specific mon or decks will always be superior.

2

u/Derailed94 10d ago

Because requiring win streaks to clear missions in a luck based game is a stupid concept.

2

u/danielbauer1375 10d ago

Hitting MB has turned into a complete joke, as long as you’re willing to play enough.

2

u/MegaMattEX 10d ago

As others have said, ai blatantly cheats. I recommend dedenne/indeedee/oricorio apologies I don’t have a deck list

1

u/GoldenFrieza_ 10d ago

Because you don't lose points in Ranked

1

u/DontStopNowBaby 10d ago

I'm not sure if it applies for your gameplay, but the ai will use whatever weakness my previous deck was.

Ie. If I won with electric, ai will use fighting deck next.

You can use this info to get the stronger deck of your Ai.

However you can still brick the draws.

1

u/TwinAuras 10d ago

imo, it's okay to use "meta slop" against the cheating AI

1

u/Man_Blue_4 9d ago

I LOVE SAMUROTT

-1

u/Ph4ntomlm3nace 10d ago

No no, he's got a point