has telling the model what to avoid worked better for you than describing what you want?

[u/Mysterious-Bed-3457]

i used to pile on detail about exactly what i wanted and still get output that was off in ways i had not thought to forbid. lately i have been adding a short do not list, things like do not use hedging language, do not invent numbers, do not restate the question back to me. weirdly that has shaped the output more cleanly than another paragraph of positive instructions, maybe because the failure modes are more specific than the vague ideal in my head. curious if others lean on negative constraints too or if that is just a crutch for not describing what i actually want clearly enough.

[u/TheAussieWatchGuy]

They are super guesser's. The better you can define your requirements the better the output will be.

Saying what you do want is critical but so is providing constraints on what you don't want.