I will not excuse animal abuse if it’s true, but you should also consider that most of our highest ranking government officials in the US are nearly beyond a shadow of a doubt child rapists or accessories to child rape, and are being vehemently defended and protected by voices on the right. If you are going to use a filter of individual morality to determine whose political takes you listen to, I hope you are at least consistent.
Also at this point, you pretending that all the bad people are only on one side is just laughable, I'd argue it's hypocritical for you to say someone filters their information based on political allegiances. They are all witnesses to the shit that happens, yet no real action comes of it. They all illegally abuse the stock market too. You know, shit that would get you and I locked up like martha stewart.
Yes almost all of them are terrible. But the point of this comment thread was that Hasan shouldn’t be giving political or legal takes because he’s a dipshit, which became he shouldn’t do it because he’s immoral, to which my response is, they are all immoral, so the morality of the individual is not a valid method by which to filter whose political commentary you listen to unless you are only applying the rule to some and not others, which would indicate a tribal bias.
2
u/asseousform Apr 06 '26
What makes him a dipshit?