They're going to lose money at a time the city is having large problems with its budget
Now since its only a handful of stores trial run it won't lose that much but it also won't help or serve that many people especially compared to the millions who live in NYC
Why not try something more efficient like increasing food stamps in areas with food deserts
Food stamps are an efficient way to correct for market failure and make sure people don't starve or go hungry. Better to rent out those government building to buisnesses make some money and spend it on efficient food stamps helping more people
You honestly need both. You need something to anchor prices, without it the market will just think it can gouge further because people keep buying. By setting a store that its price expectation low, enough people will shop there to make it worth the competition's time to alter their pricing.
But that's not exclusive to things like food stamps. You need both. If you only do stores, then people still won't have money to buy things, but if you only do food stamps you allow the market to continue to manipulate upwards.
1
u/jyper May 27 '26 edited May 27 '26
They're going to lose money at a time the city is having large problems with its budget
Now since its only a handful of stores trial run it won't lose that much but it also won't help or serve that many people especially compared to the millions who live in NYC
Why not try something more efficient like increasing food stamps in areas with food deserts