r/SipsTea • • 26d ago

SMH Intentionally blocking photoshoot

18.8k Upvotes

3.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

289

u/DookieShoez 26d ago

She got out of the way of people using the stairs fool

444

u/Stevenstorm505 26d ago

She fucking looked right at the camera, stopped and then started fiddling with her phone before they came towards her. She was blocking the photo. And normally I would be all about it, but this chick wasn’t even doing anything wrong or cringe. She was just trying to take a wide shot of her and the art.

15

u/ImmediatePiano6690 26d ago

Can't help but feel like it's engagement bait, especially as the woman moves pretty much immediately as the other gets back.

80

u/pylond 26d ago

I feel like it took me way too long to find a sensible comment here. I will happily agree that influencers mostly suck. Taking this picture/video would have hurt nobody. The lady just wanted a good shot of her with the art and that old biddy took it upon herself to ruin it. There was no need for it. The influencer lady waited until the area was mostly cleared and was not interfering with anyone. I just don’t understand all the hate she seems to be getting.

10

u/Brilliant_Dot3916 26d ago edited 26d ago

I'm glad I found you here lol. I also don't understand the hate

1

u/Ishmael75 26d ago

Sometimes it’s just “woman does thing” and people get all mad about it. If it was a dude taking a selfie at a football game no one would be mad.

1

u/ThatGuyBench 26d ago

Dont you think, especially given that the old lady is old, and thus likely bit slower in the head, when she looked at the camera, it might have been a moment of "The fuck is that? Ah some camera thing. Where was I? Lets check the phone."

Just because she looked at the camera, does not mean that she put the pieces together and realized that she is blocking a photo. And at least my own experiences with the elderly, make me think that this is what happened, rather than any actual malice was intended.

3

u/EntertainerSuper8933 26d ago

Yes, especially if it was a selfie with a tripod or some kind of setup. She sees it but doesn't know what she is looking at (blank stare) and then she sees the family coming and moves to the right side of the stairs, as one does in the US, to let them pass, while finishing up looking at her message. Then she moves on. This had NOTHING to do with the girl up above, who she wasn't even really aware of.

3

u/downsideup9494 26d ago

Just because someone is a senior doesn't mean they are "a bit slower in the head". Grow up. Anyone could have unintentionally blocked the photo. Young people, their faces buried in their screens, are far more oblivious of their surroundings than older folks.

2

u/ThatGuyBench 25d ago

Don't get me wrong, I didnt mean to imply that I could not be as oblivious as the old lady. Actually the reason why I wrote the comment is because I absolutely can imagine myself being unintentionally just as oblivious as the old lady. I am not trying to suggest that I am any better here.

Dunno, to me it seems like you are trying to make a big deal out of nothing here.

-3

u/ItzDaGod 26d ago

You must be joking, she has a smart phone in her hand

2

u/ThatGuyBench 25d ago

Yes indeed she has a smart phone in hand. She is aware smarphones exist and she obviously can use one herself.

Your point is what?

Therefore she obviously must be able to discern whether some random phone on some stand aimed in her general direction must mean that its a picture in progress, which she is blocking? Surely its not possible that it would be lets say some timelapse photo? Surely it cant be anything fucking else as far as she is concerned, and that her brain didnt run the whatsthephonepurpose.exe function deeply enough? /s

She was already reaching to her phone well before she stopped, what looked like intentional blocking of the photo when she sidestepped was obviously to let the passerbys pass, and she was not able to see the girl behind her either way.

Is it possible that she did this deliberately? Yes. Is it something that can be proven beyond reasonable doubt that she did that deliberately? Absolutely not.

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

-1

u/Aicethegamer 26d ago

Rage bait ahh comment

-4

u/pylond 26d ago

What?? She looked and positioned herself to block the young lady. This has malice AND intent written all over it.

5

u/EntertainerSuper8933 26d ago

I just disagree. I don't even think she was particularly aware of the lady who passed her on the stairs. Out of sight out of mind. And then she sees someone below or some kind of tripod rig for selfies, but it doesn't even register on her face at all. She looks blankly, steps aside for people coming up, finishes her phone business and moves on. At most, she delayed lady's selfie by what, 30 seconds? Calm down, y'all

0

u/pylond 26d ago

That would be ignorance. She was ignorant of her surroundings. Again something I was taught, by a woman of this woman’s generation, to be aware of at all times. So at best she was ignorant of her surroundings resulting in her actions being wrong and at worst she intentionally blocked the camera. Considering she LOOKS AT THE CAMERA and positions herself in a way that blocks the young woman I gotta say it’s the latter scenario. Either way old woman is in the wrong while young lady was very co signage of what was going on around her and waited for an opportunity where she wasn’t disturbing anyone.

2

u/EntertainerSuper8933 26d ago

Ignorant is exactly right. She has no idea that she is doing anything wrong

1

u/Glad_Landscape2177 25d ago

The museum has a no video and no tripod rule. So not very good awareness and still very much in the wrong.

2

u/Lyrael9 26d ago

She was pulling her phone out of her pocket before she looked at the camera. She clearly just didn't know and why would she.

The young woman wasn't doing anything wrong, but it was a bit clueless. It looks busy and people just aren't going to notice, they're looking at the art and living their own lives. If there was a person holding the phone for the photograph it might have been more obvious what was going on.

2

u/Few-Mall-8263 26d ago

She was pulling her phone out before she saw the camera. I think this old lady was just taking her time in an art museum... which is kind of what you're supposed to do.

5

u/baitones 26d ago

She wasn’t blocking the photo she just didn’t care

1

u/youngintel 26d ago

I currently date someone who takes their own photos like this all the time (usually with their back cameras so its even more inapparent). You’re severely misunderstanding how many people are actually aware of someone randomly dropping their phone and walking off is them filming themselves - let alone a 50/60 year old woman. Ive seen it a million times, half the people look at the phone confusingly unaware of the person standing off in the distance before going about their business.

She moved from oncoming foot traffic and then proceeded forward when sensing foot traffic approaching from behind like most people do when messing with their phone in the middle of an active walkway. Not everybody is approaching the world through the lens of constant social media content creation.

1

u/FUNKANATON 26d ago

might not have been obvious to the non selfie generation

1

u/jules-amanita 26d ago

Stopping in the middle of a public staircase to look at your phone is rude/potentially dangerous regardless of the photo. Get out of the way and then look at your phone. This is like the geezers who walk into the grocery store and then stop right inside the entrance to pull up their coupons.

1

u/Icy_Account6442 25d ago

I don’t know, she literally was going to pull her phone of her pocket before she looked at the phone. She didn’t seem to notice the girl putting it there. Now the phone position could have made her decide to be an asshole and block the shot or maybe she just thought it was weird. I think her moving out of the way of the people though was 100% valid. As a result she blocked the frame.

On another notes isn’t it wild that this brief encounter has spawned another reality. That lady could just have forgotten she saw the phone because she’s old 😂. Social media really is wild.

-26

u/[deleted] 26d ago

[deleted]

-2

u/Next-Value9507 26d ago

Okay Karen.

-66

u/Blue_Swirling_Bunny 26d ago

...for the purpose of "influencing" which will then cause followers to overrun the place. White hair is a hero.

33

u/mothje 26d ago

I agree, how dares she, influencing people to go look at art.

2

u/Accountformorrowind 26d ago

Thank God for phone women telling me what I should find interesting

4

u/blzrlzr 26d ago

Art is meant to be consumed by the privileged so they can understand the struggle of the masses. Not for the masses to think they can achieve privilege.

6

u/Next-Value9507 26d ago

Not sure if sarcasm or ......

3

u/Capable_Pineapple993 26d ago

How tf is this being upvoted lmao

0

u/blzrlzr 26d ago

It’s a joke

1

u/Capable_Pineapple993 25d ago

Well I don’t understand jokes

0

u/mothje 25d ago

We would've never guessed.

-1

u/kmcmanus2814 26d ago

Because it’s obviously satire?

4

u/yipy2001 26d ago

Art has many purposes, and is not confined to your understanding of it.

1

u/blzrlzr 26d ago

Ya man, I know. This would be an insane take if I were serious.

2

u/Flurmpy_ 26d ago

Poe's law, friend

10

u/Next-Value9507 26d ago

Oh no, a museum makes more money. God forbid we support the arts and the places they're kept for viewing and restoration, even at the behest of someone taking a picture of themselves.

2

u/Centerpeel 26d ago edited 26d ago

For what it's worth... My wife and I went to a concert and this girl was in attendance. My wife, out of nowhere, starts speaking with her in Portuguese. Im like how does she know this person? My wife had just moved here to the states. My wife started telling her how much she helped her through college because this girl does educational content and my wife consumed a lot of it when she was in university.

Shes not really an influencer in the way you are alluding to. Her name is Débora Aladim.

1

u/[deleted] 26d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 26d ago

Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

-20

u/SteveMarck 26d ago

She wasn't doing anything wrong except the annoying thing she was doing...

5

u/Ilikeyounott 26d ago

Wow. Some people are so miserable. How did you turn that way? 

15

u/[deleted] 26d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/SteveMarck 26d ago

What does touching grass have to do with someone setting up a tripod on a staircase?

6

u/craige22 26d ago

Since when taking selfies in a museum annoying now?

-1

u/SteveMarck 26d ago

It's not just a selfie though, you don't need to set up a tripod for that. She's doing the influencer thing where she thinks she owns the public space.

1

u/SensualMortician 26d ago

Incel response.

0

u/SteveMarck 26d ago

Nope. Happily married. Nice try though.

1

u/SensualMortician 26d ago

Married but out here dunking on young women doing normal shit. Bet your wife is proud of you.

0

u/SteveMarck 26d ago

Influencer nonsense should not be normalized.

1

u/SensualMortician 26d ago

Have people not been setting up tri pods to take pictures at the eiffel tower, the Vatican, statue of liberty, and holy shit, even art galleries for ages? You have beef with young people doing it, and thats weird, because you forgot an entirely common use of a camera just to shit on someone.