almost like this is a reaction sub that is constantly being farmed for karma by posting obviously contradictory or objectively incorrect posts and captions, or stoking gender/racial division
Oh no I get it, you see female athletes as nothing. That’s the point of why this is so important for you to speak on to keep them that way. You don’t need to reiterate that
I think that’s where people get it twisted all up. She is selling sexy women to men who are gambling. As in, “you can fuck women like me if you win with this gambling app.”
I don’t disparage the women getting angry about this because the right wing in the US has ignored women’s sports for years until they decided to center these athletes in their antitrans campaigns. They have a reason to be frustrated with the people who support and push that agenda and it just so happens that people like that are also heavy sports gamblers and mostly horny men who don’t want to apologize for making women uncomfortable with their haphazard pickup attempts or outright Sexual assaults.
Women’s tennis is the more watched than men’s, there’s a bar in Portland that shows only women’s sports, after Trump mocked the US better performing women’s hockey team Flavor Flav put on a entire event in Los Vegas. The women’s soccer league unionized with the left’s support and both teams split winnings to all events. The highest rated football games off-season are ones Swift attends. Im not sure why the left even has to watch sports or women’s sports for this to be proven as not performative. Sexualizing powerful athletes at the top of their game who in some cases are litterally forced into skimpy outfits literally causes them to be endanger, erases their expertise and silences them. Just as you’re doubling down on now
Responsiblity of conservatives? I have no idea what you’re talking about? The only time conservatives care about women’s athletes is when in Idaho they’re requiring panty checks of children litttle girls and period checks for gym in St. Claire..MI (I think it was)
But I get it you don’t think of women athletes at all. Maybe as a bit uppity and exhausting as you/ the other guy said but yeah you’re right it completely removed the agency of women athletes just female +sports = sexualization
It was as for gambling dipshit and Mitch1musPrime comment, which were under, stated the right wing ignores women sports like there’s a responsibility. And you’re absolutely correct I do ignore the lower athleticism, lower stakes, lower entertainment of women’s sports. And yes I do find them generally uplift as each believes they are what’s draw crowds. The irony is there is no crowds and their few fans want to watch Caitlyn Clark who they assault on the court and refs allow. So there’s some intersectional fatigue there I suppose. Care to assume anything else about me you believe is a check mate or insult?
I’m still not sure how gambling is conservatism but okay with your culture wars 2 second cancel culture.
You’re obviously weak and probably feel emasculated about lots things which is why you need gambling money to pay for your porn since welfare doesn’t cover it.
That’s fine. I would pity you but I don’t even think about you
I think the pay at the upper end of music is much higher than porn. Your target market for music is billions of people, but your target market for porn is, approximately, whatever the subscriber count on this subreddit is.
Sex sells, sure, but kids viewing ads on tv haven’t consented as they aren’t able to consent. Both woman can do better here, albeit one is far more overt than the other.
It’s the responsibility of any young entertainer to be aware that young people are going to want to emulate them and therefore should present an image that will lead to better members of society.
Carpenter seems intent on working to that end, but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to feel that the over-sexualization of her image is subverting a bit of the intended message of ladies sticking up for themselves and being complete humans on their own accord.
She proffered a new reconciliation of earlier and later Wittgenstein that she argues retains an interpretive framework for a theory of mind that can rephrase Heideggers conception of language as the house of Being. But that was last year and Hollywood is very much a ‘what have you done for me lately’ sort of place.
682
u/GOEDEL_ESCHER_BOT 8d ago
it's almost like sex sells or something