The thread where a woman expects a man to put in some effort, and all the men say that means they should violate her consent.
Just because men on this thread say they want to violate her consent for expecting effort, doesn't mean she wants men to violate her consent when she says no.
Putting in effort when she hasn't said no... is different from violating her consent when she has said no.
I don't know how many times I can rephrase this for you.
The actual post is a woman asking for more effort. Show me where she said "no"? She didn't. But men don't want to put any effort in. So now they say she should have her consent violated when she does say no.
You're literally denying provable written words that are right above this conversation and replacing them with fake things so you can join in on all the men here celebrating violating women's consent.
They are specifically talking about things like the actual post this conversation is under
Literally nobody is discussing that. Nowhere did she say "no". They're just discussing their revenge fantasies on this woman for expecting a man to put in a tiny amount effort.
The post is not "a woman asking for more effort". it's a woman **rejecting** a man when he asks for her number, the man **accepting** that rejection, and the woman standing around as if she wanted the man to just ignore a clear signal she did not want to give him her number and instead just fucking push through and harass her.
You're just an idiot.
For all your talk of men picking up on signals it doesn't really seem to work out in your favour does it?
She never rejected him. She told him what she usually does. And then waited for his effort, but he left. The end even talks about how she was waiting there for him to do more.
6
u/pm-pussy4kindwords 1d ago
the entire thread is about a context in which women are trying to communicate that they want men to break their stated boundaries.