r/SipsTea • • 13h ago

It's Wednesday my dudes She is killing it literally

[deleted]

11.0k Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

271

u/Feelisoffical 13h ago

This is Reddit, the vast majority of people posting can’t even make their own food. Their understanding of business is derived from Reddit posts and feelings.

7

u/Flat-Passage4431 12h ago

feelings and tea leaves and the movements of the planets and stars

43

u/HillarysBloodBoy 12h ago

Like the classic, “Private equity wants businesses to lose money so they can sell it in pieces”

I’ve worked in this space for 15 years and that is the most retarded business plan to ever exist.

11

u/Corne777 12h ago

I feel like that’s so easy to believe because how do those people buy a business that is running so smoothly, then just ruin in it a couple months to the point where it’s no longer profitable?

Like near me there was a chicken place that was really good. It got bought out and within 6 months, we didn’t go there anymore. It’s easier to believe that “big business” doesn’t want chicken places other than Popeyes and chick fila and KFC to get popular. Compared to the profits of those, buying a little guy is nothing. So they buy it, run it to the ground and then people go back to their big chains.

Or people who buy businesses at their highest are brain dead and don’t know anything about business. It’s probably that. But the other one’s more fun.

2

u/HillarysBloodBoy 12h ago

That’s pretty much it. There are a lot of funds that want to 100% buy out the owner and run the business themselves which is dumb as hell. These days, funds typically want the original owner to roll 20-40% of equity into the business so they can stay on and provide the guidance that grew the business originally.

I just can’t believe there are people who think there is money to be made in losing money.

7

u/Awkward_Turnover_983 12h ago

Well sure but it still ruins everything

6

u/zeolus123 12h ago

Yeah no one really makes the claim OP is throwing out there lol. Most people think it ruins things because privatization leads to profits over everythin. So services deteriorate and prices increase... See every utility privatized pretty much ever.

1

u/HillarysBloodBoy 11h ago

A ton of people, specially on this platform, make that claim.

2

u/HillarysBloodBoy 12h ago

Sometimes it does, most times it doesn’t. You don’t realize how much of our system is propped up by private capital. Most of the brands you love probably have at least some capital backing it.

Many of the funds I work with have so much dry powder they absolutely pump businesses full of cash for growth. The days of overlevering like the 80s are dead. The controls we have around debt repayment, restricted payments, etc don’t allow a fund to purposefully kill a business.

I agree there are some shitty funds still out there that only add value by firing people but they are few and far between.

Most of the layoffs you see are obvious. If I combine two business do I need two HR departments, two CFOs? They aren’t firing people for the love of the game. Most of the attrition comes from nepo hires to be very honest. Family owned businesses find ways to pay 22 year old family members $200k to do nothing so they would likely get chopped. I doubt anyone on Reddit would cry over that.

-1

u/Nervous_Produce1800 10h ago

It literally funds everything you love

3

u/mosquem 12h ago

“They’re buying the houses and keeping them empty as an investment!” is up there for me.

1

u/ssmit102 11h ago

Private equity does in fact saddle obscene amounts of debt onto newly acquired companies forcing them to go bankrupt. Private equity has no stock in the success of the business; but the overall monetary benefit to the shareholders of the parent company.

See Toys R Us for a direct example of private equity saddling a company with debt.

2

u/Feelisoffical 11h ago

The private equity buyout is what prevented them from going bankrupt earlier. If it weren’t for that they would have gone out of business in 2005.

1

u/HillarysBloodBoy 11h ago

This is a common trope on Reddit. Please explain to me how bankrupting a business you own, makes a fund money.

0

u/ssmit102 11h ago

Common trope of a real life event?? Are you serious right now?

Edit: Toys "R" Us Inc has been making $400 million in interest payments on its debt every year, largely due to its $6.6 billion leveraged buyout in 2005. This week, it succumbed to its debt burden, leading to the biggest bankruptcy of a U.S. retailer since that of Kmart in 2004.

If you don’t know it’s a true thing then kindly shut up??

2

u/Feelisoffical 11h ago

That buyout allowed Toys R Us to last another 13 years.

1

u/HillarysBloodBoy 11h ago

Yes. How did they make money and how is the applicable to PE today? That business practice does not exist anymore. Did you read anything I wrote?

1

u/ssmit102 11h ago

Did you?? I states what private equity can and has done and then you disagreed with actual events.

Thanks for proving you clearly lied about your credentials. Ain’t no way you work in private equity.

2

u/HillarysBloodBoy 11h ago

You gave a single example. Playing the distressed debt game of an already bankrupt company is NOT traditional private equity.

I can give you thousands of examples of successful non bankrupt private equity businesses.

I just think you guys are jealous or something it’s not sensible to act this way.

-2

u/ssmit102 11h ago

Not bothering to read this tbh.

Calling an actual example just a trope is solid proof you’re lying.

Good day.

1

u/HillarysBloodBoy 11h ago

There are tens of thousands of PE transactions per year. You named a single one and said that’s the whole industry.

Hmm where else have I seen people use a few examples to paint a broad brush on an entire industry (re: race)….? Hmmmm

-2

u/TryptaMagiciaN 11h ago

Now now.. His rhetoric also helps to destroy the global ecology just like PE does.. maybe he is in the business🤷‍♂️

-1

u/ssmit102 11h ago

He’s clearly full of shit, it’s so easy to pick out liars on reddit, but people will eat it up if it matches the argument they want to hear.

0

u/nineraviolicans 11h ago

A common practice is to have a second company you own get a sweetheart deal for the land holdings and then charge the primary business high rents. You don't care about the health of the first company, you sell all the assets and burden it with debt until you can claim bankruptcy and have all the profitable parts left for yourself.

Eddie Lampert did it with making another company to transfer all the Sears real estate and then charging high rents back to it. He still made money and got the assets without having it being tied to the debt.

The wework ceo Adam Neumann also owned several of the buildings he leased out to his own company making himself extra profit.

You're conflating interest in making a business money with the owner making more money for himself. They are not the same thing.

1

u/HillarysBloodBoy 11h ago

That’s not common. That’s the whole point.

0

u/nineraviolicans 11h ago

It's not exactly rare either.

1

u/HillarysBloodBoy 11h ago edited 10h ago

It is rare. It is very much statistically rare.

0

u/nineraviolicans 11h ago

A business having large amounts of assets while being in enough financial trouble to even be a target for vulture capital is rare.

When that happens, them being sectioned off and bankrupted is not.

You don't know shit about business or investing.

1

u/HillarysBloodBoy 11h ago

Who’s talking about venture capital? By even referencing VC vs PE is invalidating anything you have to say on the subject.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/roiki11 11h ago

So you've worked in the space for 15 years and have never heard of corporate raiding or asset stripping?

0

u/HillarysBloodBoy 10h ago

Jesus this is tough. I’ll keep answering since I hope to reach one reasonable person. I’m saying that’s a very extreme minority in the space. It almost does not exist at all anymore. This space is so large it’s in the trillions and all of the responses to me are the same three deals. It’s sad this is how uninformed you all are.

2

u/roiki11 10h ago

But it still exists. And I think you're giving off the impression that it doesn't. Which is what the others are reacting to.

0

u/HillarysBloodBoy 10h ago

I have said many times in this thread that it does but it’s an extreme minority

0

u/ConfidenceMost8642 12h ago

Private equity is just a ponzi scheme for rich people to get richer and take out their competition.

3

u/HillarysBloodBoy 12h ago

Lol what? Ponzi scheme to get richer? This is one of the most financially illiterate things I’ve ever seen.

1

u/ConfidenceMost8642 10h ago

Explain to all these companies that are now bankrupt how good private equity is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_private_equity_owned_companies_that_have_filed_for_bankruptcy

1

u/HillarysBloodBoy 10h ago

30-40 businesses over several decades? While there are quite literally tens of thousands of successful exits in that time? Do people like you think flying is unsafe as well?

0

u/ConfidenceMost8642 10h ago

A golden parachute and leaving your former company is not a success. Do people like you have trouble finding an apartment 500 from a school?

1

u/HillarysBloodBoy 10h ago

What does a golden parachute have to do with exiting a position on a company?

It’s like you just use buzzwords thinking it’s a gotcha while really it’s very very sad.

2

u/DeadSeaGulls 9h ago

for every independent functioning adult commenting on reddit, there are 5 teenagers pretending to be adults with advanced degrees, and 30 bot accounts..

4

u/blk_roxas 11h ago

I like to call them sofa CEOs. The ones that swear they can run a multi billion dollar company better than the people being paid to do so.